Activism Change

anti-smokers die!

Question:

NG’s trimmed.  This is to appear exclusively in alt.smokers.    In ontario, as of January 1st 1997, smoking in bars and restaurants is illegal.

No, but as of 1/I/97, smoking will be banned in the City of Toronto in all bars and restaurants.  I understand that there are already marketing plans under way in North York.  I also understand that Toronto Mayor Barbara Hall is seeking to re-open the issue on Friday night, as restauranteurs are (sorry, sorry) fuming. This seems to be the best way to ensure that Toronto’s reputation as an eminently livable city is diminished.  The city’s reputation developed because it has been a good model of how to achieve compromise among various groups with conflicting interests.  The Mike Harris Government’s obvious hostility to Toronto was the beginning of a class war in T.O.   Now, we’ll have the case where the wealthy set themselves up in private clubs to smoke, while the poor will be left without one of the few small pleasures grudgingly left them.  Even Caesar knew that you had to give the poor bread and circuses. Ah, well.  Toronto always _did_ want to join the big leagues, and become a "world-class city".  Guess they meant "unlivable American city".  Pity. — Andrew Sullivan     | "Culture is activity of thought, and receptiveness to McMaster University | have nothing to do with it."  A.N. Whitehead Ontario, Canada     |

Response:

Necron99 at having found something disgusting had this to say: On Sun, 07 Jul 1996 , The militant Dyke-Cuntsucker posing as plastic coated asshole and farted out these simple words for all the world to see and laugh and jape and jeer:   Notice just how righteous IT can be! Note:  This Editor has graciously snipped off the absolutely useless cross posts and Multiplicity of usenet groups  that the Dyke name above saw fit to inflict on USENET.   The cross post list has been shortened to include ONLY those Groups deemed relevant to this response and topic.  Your welcome. Uh…

  Notice, the cunt sucking Lesbo has a very good way to start a paragraph.. Was this an automatic response to pulling her head out of her ass long enough to see the keys on her computer?  We think not, here at the Anti-Activism League.    Rather, it’s a precursor of things to come.  Monosyllables and Militant-Lezbo-Activism seem to go hand in hand… Because you’re exercising your right, I get deprived of mine.

   Ah, yes, I see.  A whine.  Most activists start off their depraved rantings with whines.  This is considered by many activists as "Living Proof" and justification.    So far so good.  Let’s proceed… There’s no such thing as a non-chlorinated section of the pool, and there is likewise no such thing as a no-smoking section of a room.

   This is known in Activism circles as "Activism Logic" or AL.  You make an obviously inconsequential parallelism between a physical impossibility:  The pool, and a commonly accepted social convention, The Non-smoking area..  This is then fudged as logic to those people who just do not think things through to a conclusion for themselves as "The right way to think"  It sounds good, therefore it must be true. I choose not to have lung cancer, but you’re choosing for you and me both to get lung cancer.

   Another typical activism morality drama.  Pretend to grant the other person control over your own decisions, then beat them over the head with it. Activists, just love to do this..  But take them up on their offer, and actually exercise that grant and watch out!        You know, I have this theory that Militant-Lesbo-Activists like Michaela (michaela?  Isn’t that Michael with a little something extra?  Like penis envy perhaps?) started life out as a cheerleader type who went out on a date one night, got a little too fired up with a boy, but then got so frightened, that she retreated to the dark corners of her mind to hide for the rest of her pathetic life…   With the consequence of not being able to perform sexually in the commonly acceptable manner, she now seeks importance and justification for her lifestyle by identifying with any losing cause.     What’s your opinion? Don’t pull this free choice crap. Your "free choice" directly affects me.

   Hey, shit for brains, you are the one pulling the free choice crap now. So much for free choice eh?  Good enough when it’s your free choice we’re discussing, but not good enough when someone else’s free choices is the subject..  Sounds like 1960’s communism..  What’s ours is ours, what’s yours is debatable….    You obviously can’t accept the world as it is, you have to pretend to have some sort of righteous magical mystical power that will give you a modicum of control…  Well little lesbo, you HAVE no control..  You have no self respect, you have no good cause, you have no righteousness but the SELF-RIGHTEOUS.  You are the lost cause… Go home and smoke, or smoke in one of those airport cages, but don’t even say it’s cool to try and "compromise" about public smoking.

  Sorry, folks, this is about as grown up as she gets…  "It’s my ball, and we’re going to play by my rules"  So much for trying to get along with other people..  Activists don’t WANT to get along, they want control.  And they can never get enough control.  Never never never give in to an activists whining. Activism should be summarily punished with extreme prejudice.   Cigarette smoke is as toxic as asbestos, and they don’t offer businesses the option to have an "asbestos-inhaling" and "non-asbestos-inhaling" area.

   Ah, this of course HAS been proven by numerous scientific studies best performed by other Militant-Lesbo-Cunt-sucking-NON-smoking Activists right?    Of course, the above statement (hers) is yet another device that is taught to the fledgling Activist, make a completely ridiculous point, and use it as proof for another completely ridiculous point.      Actually, My dear, Any Business is free to have it’s own asbestos inhaling area..  But just try to sell the idea to any businessman.  Or restaurateurs and I’ll watch you get bounced out on your ass into the street.   It’s more a matter of practicality here in the real world, but then, terms like "practicality" and "real world" don’t have much meaning to activists now do they?  Since Activists DON’T live in the "real world", they live in some paranoid fantasy world where everyone’s out to take away their rights.  WAA WAA  WAAAAA….. Grow up! I don’t care if you want to die of cancer; it’s a "free" country. But this public smoking garbage… Argh! It’s a bunch of tobacco executive brainwashing! Michaela

   And here we have it:  The tobacco conspiracy…  The root of all evil… Foisted upon all those innocent unsuspecting good people of the earth, by the evil tobacco industry..  Must be run by satan, oops, I meant Shaitan.. <Insert favored demon name here    Just what have you been burning lately?  A little GASOLINE maybe?  Eh? How about those electric lights, and the juice used to power that computer? How about your air conditioner?  Your toaster?  I know Activsts like you just must have their dry peanut butter toast in the morning….  What gets burned to make those kilowatts?  And you’re whining about cigarette smoke?  If you are going to whine, and I’m sure you ARE, then at least make your up till now totally useless existence worth at least a little bit..  Whine about something useful for a change.  Nobody gives a fuck about YOUR rights.  You HAVE no rights.  You’ve abused the granted rights of a free society given in good faith.   You’ve been pegged as an ACTIVIST.  You are a whining burden on society.  YOU are expendable.   I may be a ranting lunitic, but at least I provide some entertainment value…You, on the other hand, cause nothing but pain. And finally kiddies, we come to the statement of personality, that has been inflicted on USENET and email, What used to be a one-liner witty tag line, but has now grown to godzilla proportions, the Sig file.  (That’s SIG FILE, not ZIEG HEIL) It’s not just an identification of who posted, it’s now a public service message area..  Soon, yes too soon, we’ll all be selling out space in our sig files for Coca-cola, Pepsi, Mcdonalds and god-forbid AOL commercials…   I can’t wait till the day when the first Multimedia Sig file is invented…  And you know it will be sooner or later.. — …When someone says, "You gays, you faggots and queers and bulldykes are bad; you’re evil and wicked and full of sin and we good, righteous, upstanding people are going to destroy you."

Here, let me help you with this, you seem to have gotten the translation all mucked up below:    You are an abomination of nature.  A genetic dead end , Carriers of Immorality and disruptions of all that is good and clean and pure.  Your spirits are corrupt and confused, and all over the world, you practice your craft in secrecy, clouded with mysticism.      You claim "alternate lifestyle"  A PC term for unacceptable behavior by the general public.  The only thing that has kept your breed alive was the revoking of the punishment of stoning to death all abominations on sight.  You should thank us for our mercy at having allowed you to live this long… Uh oh, here it comes, the "Alternate lifestyle" translation…  Notice how nice it is…  Urban camouflage… What is really being said, in the light of the "real", that is the historical (etymological), meaning of the words, is this: "You children of Gaia, you sacred male firesticks, round-dancers and daughters of the warrior goddess of Justice and Balance, you who are part-man-part-woman like a combination of Hermes and Aphrodite, you who are fruits from Eve the Mother, and have a habit of gathering in covens and desiring to know, you who are full of the spirit of the Moon; we don’t like you, and we who are children of the One-god, and of the right side, we straight up-and-down in a line people are going to make your living and your expression of your being as difficult as we can."

   Gee, I didn’t know the original had nearly as much praise in it..  Or as much self depreciation for the up-standing righteous   did I miss something? Did any one else get all that in the first few lines?  Hmmmm…  I may just have to rethink my stance here….NOT Well, so be it.

  Wrong…  This is a common fallacy among Dykes and Fags.  They don’t like being hated, or threatened so they enter this fantasy world of roses and sweet smells and good intentions.    When a Fag-hater says he’s going to kill you, he means that he is going to kill you.  He didn’t mean that he doesn’t like you and is going to make your life difficult,  He means that his intention is to end your miserable existence.  It means that your termination is soon to be realized.  That your life expectancy can be measured in seconds.  It isn’t a matter of inconvenience, it’s a matter of life and death…  The "REAL" world is full of people who KILL faggots and Lesbians, and Witches, and Goat fuckers. Obviously you didn’t wake up and smell the coffee <too much caffeine I suppose   Notice the big words "historical (etymological)"  this is yet another Activists tool to gain respectability and credibility..  It’s supposed to make the writer look like … read more »

Response:

Filed under: Rights Activism

Related Posts

• Canadian troops out of the Mideast! - repost from '2000 alt activism
• FUCK THE POLICE
• Israeli Separation Wall "Fatal Policy": Vanessa Redgrave
• Religious Freedom Restoration
• MAY 12, 1997 - DAY OF ELECTRONIC ACTIVISM
• I Don't Know Her!
• Teens want more time with parents but it is not happening.
• Action Alert - Stop Minnesota Baby Dump Bill on the Governor's Desk!
• Proposed: Full Rights Amendment
• De-mythification #1: "Free" Elections in 1990