REHNQUIST, CANCER
Question:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Thursday, Nov. 04, 2004 Recently, the Supreme Court made a saddening announcement: Chief Justice William Rehnquist is battling thyroid cancer. The news came as a surprise in the midst of an intense presidential campaign. Rehnquist plans to get back to work as soon as he can, but this very serious illness underlines the chance that he – and/or other Justices – may leave the Court over the next four years, with President Bush nominating a successor, or successors. That is a tremendous responsibility. http://writ.news.findlaw.com/hamilton/20041104.html Hamilton is a former SCOTUS clerk. There’s a certain collegiality there. Rehnquist should die in the most painful manner possible. Why, because he and Hamilton were collegial? Indeed it is, as well as an historic opportunity. We’ve seen a trend towards the liberal minority interests using the courts to legislate what they cannot win at the ballot box. So-called gay marriage comes most readily to mind, but it is from from the only issue. I anticipate that should the vacancies appear that are expected we can see this trend stopped dead in its tracks. To be replaced with conservative activism, which insulates government and corporate interests from any and all responsibility for tortious conduct. This is a good thing? We can only hope for a diminishing of business bankrupting lawsuits awarded by naive juries, led by the nose by John Edwards and co. We can only hope for a restoration of manufacturing that could result from businesses actually being able to afford to function and profit. Edwards likes to tell us how his daddy worked at a mill to support him. When Johnny grew up, *he* closed the mill, and a lot of dads didn’t have the chance to support their families by working in one. can u send us to url’s showing how he closed mills ? thank u
its interesting how the christians seem sometimes to lie and yet none of them have any problem with it. and these are supposed to be the christians. — Love is all u need.
Response:
Rehnquist should die in the most painful manner possible. That’s my line, counseler. You’re welcome to it.
How magnanimous of you to offer me something which is already mine. How Repugnikkkan, eh? Feel free.
Not in this U$$A. Do you?* *Without of course using the Ted Kaldis Thoroughly Fucked Dictionary definition of "free".
Response:
Rehnquist should die in the most painful manner possible. That’s my line, counseler. You’re welcome to it. How magnanimous of you to offer me something which is already mine. How Repugnikkkan, eh?
Just like Karl Rove — you take the literal and make if figurative, and take the figurative and make it literal. Feel free. Not in this U$$A. Do you?*
Not any more. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – *Without of course using the Ted Kaldis Thoroughly Fucked Dictionary definition of "free".
Response:
Rehnquist should die in the most painful manner possible. That’s my line, counseler.
You’re welcome to it. Feel free.
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Thursday, Nov. 04, 2004 Recently, the Supreme Court made a saddening announcement: Chief Justice William Rehnquist is battling thyroid cancer. The news came as a surprise in the midst of an intense presidential campaign. Rehnquist plans to get back to work as soon as he can, but this very serious illness underlines the chance that he – and/or other Justices – may leave the Court over the next four years, with President Bush nominating a successor, or successors. That is a tremendous responsibility. http://writ.news.findlaw.com/hamilton/20041104.html Hamilton is a former SCOTUS clerk. There’s a certain collegiality there. Rehnquist should die in the most painful manner possible. Why, because he and Hamilton were collegial?
It’s more a matter of political correctness than anything else. Marci Hamilton is a member of the SCOTUS Bar, and judges have this nasty habit of forgetting their legal obligations. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -Indeed it is, as well as an historic opportunity. We’ve seen a trend towards the liberal minority interests using the courts to legislate what they cannot win at the ballot box. So-called gay marriage comes most readily to mind, but it is from from the only issue. I anticipate that should the vacancies appear that are expected we can see this trend stopped dead in its tracks. To be replaced with conservative activism, which insulates government and corporate interests from any and all responsibility for tortious conduct. This is a good thing? We can only hope for a diminishing of business bankrupting lawsuits awarded by naive juries, led by the nose by John Edwards and co. We can only hope for a restoration of manufacturing that could result from businesses actually being able to afford to function and profit. Edwards likes to tell us how his daddy worked at a mill to support him. When Johnny grew up, *he* closed the mill, and a lot of dads didn’t have the chance to support their families by working in one.
I would be among the first to agree that a lawsuit claiming damages because a McDonald’s actually served hot coffee is not just frivolous but staggeringly so. But truth be told, tort liability law in other countries isn’t *that* far behind ours, as far as the envelope being pushed. Where Herr Rehnquist and the like have done a grave disservice to the law is in sheltering government officials from responsibility for their intentionally tortious actions. Rehnquist has done everything he could to disenfranchise individuals, thereby transforming citizenship into an empty promise. For this, he deserves as much misery as life can bestow upon him.
Response:
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Thursday, Nov. 04, 2004 Recently, the Supreme Court made a saddening announcement: Chief Justice William Rehnquist is battling thyroid cancer. The news came as a surprise in the midst of an intense presidential campaign. Rehnquist plans to get back to work as soon as he can, but this very serious illness underlines the chance that he – and/or other Justices – may leave the Court over the next four years, with President Bush nominating a successor, or successors. That is a tremendous responsibility. http://writ.news.findlaw.com/hamilton/20041104.html Indeed it is, as well as an historic opportunity.
An historic opportunity to remove the last vestiges of the checks and balances established by our constitution. Congratulations, you’ve voided the document. — Denis Loubet http://www.io.com/~dloubet
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Thursday, Nov. 04, 2004 Recently, the Supreme Court made a saddening announcement: Chief Justice William Rehnquist is battling thyroid cancer. The news came as a surprise in the midst of an intense presidential campaign. Rehnquist plans to get back to work as soon as he can, but this very serious illness underlines the chance that he – and/or other Justices – may leave the Court over the next four years, with President Bush nominating a successor, or successors. That is a tremendous responsibility. http://writ.news.findlaw.com/hamilton/20041104.html Hamilton is a former SCOTUS clerk. There’s a certain collegiality there. Rehnquist should die in the most painful manner possible. Indeed it is, as well as an historic opportunity. We’ve seen a trend towards the liberal minority interests using the courts to legislate what they cannot win at the ballot box. So-called gay marriage comes most readily to mind, but it is from from the only issue. I anticipate that should the vacancies appear that are expected we can see this trend stopped dead in its tracks. To be replaced with conservative activism, which insulates government and corporate interests from any and all responsibility for tortious conduct. This is a good thing?
one of his comments a year or so ago was that it was ok for the u s to have a holy war aginst the muslims because the chrisitans did it in the past. very strange and interesting man. of course if he dies bush will appoint who he feels best in the court. it comes with the territory. i dont think people can complain. bush did win his second term by 51 percent of the vote. this is part of our system at work. i do find it interesting though that the republicans smile and are happy when they can through our system what they want. they dont seem to believe that our free system is the strongest we can have though. the church is not a democratic system. i would look to see more laws that limit freedom and instead put church law more in our country. i would expect more laws passed to strengthen and in addition to the patriot act. i believe reinquit will die soon. lets see what happens — Love is all u need.
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Thursday, Nov. 04, 2004 Recently, the Supreme Court made a saddening announcement: Chief Justice William Rehnquist is battling thyroid cancer. The news came as a surprise in the midst of an intense presidential campaign. Rehnquist plans to get back to work as soon as he can, but this very serious illness underlines the chance that he – and/or other Justices – may leave the Court over the next four years, with President Bush nominating a successor, or successors. That is a tremendous responsibility. http://writ.news.findlaw.com/hamilton/20041104.html Hamilton is a former SCOTUS clerk. There’s a certain collegiality there. Rehnquist should die in the most painful manner possible. Why, because he and Hamilton were collegial? Indeed it is, as well as an historic opportunity. We’ve seen a trend towards the liberal minority interests using the courts to legislate what they cannot win at the ballot box. So-called gay marriage comes most readily to mind, but it is from from the only issue. I anticipate that should the vacancies appear that are expected we can see this trend stopped dead in its tracks. To be replaced with conservative activism, which insulates government and corporate interests from any and all responsibility for tortious conduct. This is a good thing? We can only hope for a diminishing of business bankrupting lawsuits awarded by naive juries, led by the nose by John Edwards and co. We can only hope for a restoration of manufacturing that could result from businesses actually being able to afford to function and profit. Edwards likes to tell us how his daddy worked at a mill to support him. When Johnny grew up, *he* closed the mill, and a lot of dads didn’t have the chance to support their families by working in one.
can u send us to url’s showing how he closed mills ? thank u — Love is all u need.
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Thursday, Nov. 04, 2004 Recently, the Supreme Court made a saddening announcement: Chief Justice William Rehnquist is battling thyroid cancer. The news came as a surprise in the midst of an intense presidential campaign. Rehnquist plans to get back to work as soon as he can, but this very serious illness underlines the chance that he – and/or other Justices – may leave the Court over the next four years, with President Bush nominating a successor, or successors. That is a tremendous responsibility. http://writ.news.findlaw.com/hamilton/20041104.html Hamilton is a former SCOTUS clerk. There’s a certain collegiality there. Rehnquist should die in the most painful manner possible.
That’s my line, counseler. Indeed it is, as well as an historic opportunity. We’ve seen a trend towards the liberal minority interests using the courts to legislate what they cannot win at the ballot box. So-called gay marriage comes most readily to mind, but it is from from the only issue. I anticipate that should the vacancies appear that are expected we can see this trend stopped dead in its tracks. To be replaced with conservative activism, which insulates government and corporate interests from any and all responsibility for tortious conduct. This is a good thing?
For the morons and idiots that are the average ‘murrikun … Re: REHNQUIST, CANCER and KARMA ! Die a slow painful death you fascist shitsucker!
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Thursday, Nov. 04, 2004 Recently, the Supreme Court made a saddening announcement: Chief Justice William Rehnquist is battling thyroid cancer. The news came as a surprise in the midst of an intense presidential campaign. Rehnquist plans to get back to work as soon as he can, but this very serious illness underlines the chance that he – and/or other Justices – may leave the Court over the next four years, with President Bush nominating a successor, or successors. That is a tremendous responsibility. http://writ.news.findlaw.com/hamilton/20041104.html Hamilton is a former SCOTUS clerk. There’s a certain collegiality there. Rehnquist should die in the most painful manner possible.
Why, because he and Hamilton were collegial? Indeed it is, as well as an historic opportunity. We’ve seen a trend towards the liberal minority interests using the courts to legislate what they cannot win at the ballot box. So-called gay marriage comes most readily to mind, but it is from from the only issue. I anticipate that should the vacancies appear that are expected we can see this trend stopped dead in its tracks. To be replaced with conservative activism, which insulates government and corporate interests from any and all responsibility for tortious conduct. This is a good thing?
We can only hope for a diminishing of business bankrupting lawsuits awarded by naive juries, led by the nose by John Edwards and co. We can only hope for a restoration of manufacturing that could result from businesses actually being able to afford to function and profit. Edwards likes to tell us how his daddy worked at a mill to support him. When Johnny grew up, *he* closed the mill, and a lot of dads didn’t have the chance to support their families by working in one.
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Thursday, Nov. 04, 2004 Recently, the Supreme Court made a saddening announcement: Chief Justice William Rehnquist is battling thyroid cancer. The news came as a surprise in the midst of an intense presidential campaign. Rehnquist plans to get back to work as soon as he can, but this very serious illness underlines the chance that he – and/or other Justices – may leave the Court over the next four years, with President Bush nominating a successor, or successors. That is a tremendous responsibility. http://writ.news.findlaw.com/hamilton/20041104.html
Hamilton is a former SCOTUS clerk. There’s a certain collegiality there. Rehnquist should die in the most painful manner possible. Indeed it is, as well as an historic opportunity. We’ve seen a trend towards the liberal minority interests using the courts to legislate what they cannot win at the ballot box. So-called gay marriage comes most readily to mind, but it is from from the only issue. I anticipate that should the vacancies appear that are expected we can see this trend stopped dead in its tracks.
To be replaced with conservative activism, which insulates government and corporate interests from any and all responsibility for tortious conduct. This is a good thing?
Response:
Thursday, Nov. 04, 2004 Recently, the Supreme Court made a saddening announcement: Chief Justice William Rehnquist is battling thyroid cancer. The news came as a surprise in the midst of an intense presidential campaign. Rehnquist plans to get back to work as soon as he can, but this very serious illness underlines the chance that he – and/or other Justices – may leave the Court over the next four years, with President Bush nominating a successor, or successors. That is a tremendous responsibility. http://writ.news.findlaw.com/hamilton/20041104.html
Response:
Thursday, Nov. 04, 2004 Recently, the Supreme Court made a saddening announcement: Chief Justice William Rehnquist is battling thyroid cancer. The news came as a surprise in the midst of an intense presidential campaign. Rehnquist plans to get back to work as soon as he can, but this very serious illness underlines the chance that he – and/or other Justices – may leave the Court over the next four years, with President Bush nominating a successor, or successors. That is a tremendous responsibility. http://writ.news.findlaw.com/hamilton/20041104.html
Indeed it is, as well as an historic opportunity. We’ve seen a trend towards the liberal minority interests using the courts to legislate what they cannot win at the ballot box. So-called gay marriage comes most readily to mind, but it is from from the only issue. I anticipate that should the vacancies appear that are expected we can see this trend stopped dead in its tracks.
Response:
Filed under: Political Activism
Related Posts
- Libertarian FAQ: Frequently Asked Questions
- Population Growth is Caused by Renaissances
- Secret Loans to Iraq BACKGROUND: Bush's Gulf War Strategy
- Read this for inspiration!
- Did you know this fact about Peter Breggin?
- Was there any HOMOSEXUAL Dinosaurs
- Lefty Liberals showing their usual totalitarian tactics in Berkeley...
- Welcome to Orwe-- I mean -- Bush's Vision for the Future
- The Crimes of Nicaragua (V)
- Confluence - A paddler's "Reader's Digest"
Leave a Comment
XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
TrackBack URL | RSS feed for comments on this post.