Rachel Corrie – Martyr or Roadkill? – Tons of info, pictures, etc. inside .. | Peace activist

Rachel Corrie – Martyr or Roadkill? – Tons of info, pictures, etc. inside ..

Question:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I just spilled my coffee… You will regret and you’ll be sorry To ridicule the death of Rachel Cory She stood alone against brutal Zion They crushed her but could not kill the story Children dead with demolished homes Will drag you one day to a heavenly jury You’ll curse bulldozers and your laughter When Hell unleashes her endless fury Damn your wickedness, damn your lies She was Jesus, she was Mary Oh well, Sheakespeare you ain’t… Don’t quit your day job at McDonalds. TK9

Perhaps you should be the one working at McDonald as you can’t even spell *Shakespeare.*

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I just spilled my coffee… You will regret and you’ll be sorry To ridicule the death of Rachel Cory She stood alone against brutal Zion They crushed her but could not kill the story Children dead with demolished homes Will drag you one day to a heavenly jury You’ll curse bulldozers and your laughter When Hell unleashes her endless fury Damn your wickedness, damn your lies She was Jesus, she was Mary

Oh well, Sheakespeare you ain’t… Don’t quit your day job at McDonalds. TK9

Response:

I just spilled my coffee…

You will regret and you’ll be sorry To ridicule the death of Rachel Cory She stood alone against brutal Zion They crushed her but could not kill the story Children dead with demolished homes Will drag you one day to a heavenly jury You’ll curse bulldozers and your laughter When Hell unleashes her endless fury Damn your wickedness, damn your lies She was Jesus, she was Mary

Response:

Rachel Corrie!! - MARTYR or ROADKILL? Photo of Saint Rachel destroying U.S. flag and teaching the little children of Gaza how to show their hatred for America: America is ruled by the Jew devils.

You need to leave America, you are certainly NOT an American. While you’re at it, please leave Planet Earth, because you are certainly NOT a human being.

Response:

by Kevin Alfred Strom …The May 18th meeting of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (or AIPAC for short) in Washington, DC… AIPAC is the most influential lobby in Washington, and is totally focused on maintaining and increasing American taxpayer support for Israel, both financial and military, and in destroying all critics of Israel or of Jewish supremacism… When Bush ascended to the AIPAC podium, flanked by leading Jewish supremacists on both sides, behind him was a huge new flag design, probably 50 feet long, consisting of American stars and stripes interspersed with huge Stars of David. Bush, interrupted by wild applause and several standing ovations from the Zionist audience which included Ariel Sharon, referred to the leading Jewish supremacists on the platform by their first names: "I’m honored to be here at AIPAC, thank you for such a warm welcome. It’s good to be with so many friends — friends of mine and friends of Israel. …I want to thank Amy for her leadership. I appreciate you taking time to serve a cause that — in which you believe deeply. I want to thank Bernice for her willingness to serve, as well. I’ve known Howard for a long time. He’s effective. I want to thank the AIPAC board — AIPAC board members for their friendship and leadership. I’m honored to be in the presence of my friend, the Ambassador from Israel, Danny Ayalon. I appreciate you being here, Danny." How cozy. The president went on in this vein for about forty minutes, acting more like an Israeli cabinet minister than an American president. He congratulated himself for his unwavering support for Zionism, justified the horrible terror-war being waged on Israel’s behalf in Iraq, and engaged in some saber-rattling against other Muslim states that don’t want to have a government supervised by Jews. Bush also repeated the catch-phrase that has a hidden meaning to Jewish supremacists, the phrase I’ve spoken about before on American Dissident Voices — "committed to the security of Israel as a Jewish state," which is repeated almost word-for-word again and again by Israel’s sycophants and Capitol Hill puppets. and which means much more than seems. [ http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=1282 ] The words ‘as a Jewish state’ are crucial: they mean support for Israel as a racial state for one people alone, something that the Jewish power structure denies to every White nation — yet White politicians must express their "commitment" to Israel. Bush stated: "The United States is strongly committed, and I am strongly committed, to the security of Israel as a vibrant Jewish state." Identical to the catch-phrase, with only the addition of the word ‘vibrant.’ Bush is not committed to America as an American state — in fact, he supports amnesty for illegal invaders. All that is to be expected from Bush, considering his dependence on Jewish favor, Jewish money, and Jewish media for his election. But what I found most chilling about Bush’s groveling speech before his masters was this section, in which he makes reference to a recent meeting of the so-called Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), which is working with American and European governments to outlaw free speech by "monitoring" and outlawing criticism of Jews [ http://www.natvan.com/pub/2003/053103.txt http://www.natvan.com/pub/2003/062803.txt ]: "The Jewish people have seen, over the years and over the centuries, that hate prepares the way for violence. The refusal to expose and confront intolerance can lead to crimes beyond imagining. So we have a duty to expose and confront anti-Semitism, wherever it is found. Some of you attended a very important event in Berlin last month, the International Conference on Anti-Semitism. You understand that anti-Semitism is not a problem of the past; the hatred of Jews did not die in a Berlin bunker. In its cruder forms, it can be found in some Arab media, and this government will continue to call upon Arab governments to end libels and incitements. Such hatred can also take subtler forms. The demonization of Israel, the most extreme anti-Zionist rhetoric can be a flimsy cover for anti-Semitism, and contribute to an atmosphere of fear in which synagogues are desecrated, people are slandered, folks are threatened. I will continue to call upon our friends in Europe to renounce and fight any sign of anti-Semitism in their midst." [ http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2004/05/20040518-1.html ] You’ll notice two things here: 1) Bush is conflating negative feelings about Jews, and ‘rhetoric,’ with actual violent acts and a supposed ‘atmosphere’ that ‘creates’ them, thus setting the stage for the legally-required ‘monitoring’ of all critics of Jewish power and the criminalization of the free speech of these critics, and 2) the redefinition of criticism of Israel or Zionism, making them into just another form of so-called "anti-Semitism," so they, too, can be ‘monitored’ and eventually criminalized. Both of these are something that Jewish pressure groups worldwide have been pushing hard for recently, and Bush promised to give them exactly what they want. Meanwhile, at yet another meeting, John Kerry, who is actually of Jewish ancestry himself, tried to out-promise Bush with his protestations of love for Zionism and hatred of any who would criticize Jewish supremacism. At a meeting last month of the crime-linked Jewish spying operation and pressure group, the ‘Anti-Defamation League’ (ADL) in Washington, Kerry said the following: "…what ADL stands for is what I would like to fight for. …And after last week’s [OSCE] conference in Berlin, we celebrate 55 countries that came together who have pledged to intensify their efforts to combat anti-Semitism and to spread tolerance. …And we still know that anti-Semitism, notwithstanding the meeting of 55 countries, has been growing, and demands global leadership in order to stand up against it. …Across the Atlantic we’ve seen a new wave of anti-Semitism, masking as anti-Israel sentiment, and it’s creeping its way across Europe and the Middle East. …The people of Israel should also know that for the entire 20 years that I have been in the United States Senate, I’m proud that my commitment to a secure Jewish state has been unwavering; not even by one vote or one letter or one resolution has it wavered. And as president, I can guarantee you that that support and that effort for our ally, a vibrant democracy, will continue. …The security of Israel is paramount." [ http://www.us-israel.org/jsource/US-Israel/kerryadl.html ] Ladies and gentlemen, you cannot have more than one paramount value. If a certain thing is your highest value, that means that all other things are of lesser or no value. Kerry says "The security of Israel is paramount." Not the security of the United States. Not the security of our children’s future. Not the security of Western civilization or its founding race. None of these are paramount to Kerry, or for that matter Bush or any of the bought politicians. The Jewish state alone is paramount. (In one of those coincidences that is simply too funny to have been made up, I note that Kerry’s ‘liaison with the Jewish community’ is a person named Jay Footlik.) As for Ralph Nader, he himself, like Kerry, is not entirely White (though he’s not Jewish) and he cannot be expected to articulate the interests of White Americans. He has approached Middle Eastern issues with more objectivity than Kerry or Bush — he recently referred to Kerry as "part of the Washington puppet show on the Israeli/Palestinian matter" — and he would restrict some of the worst abuses of the open-border maniacs for rational economic reasons… [ http://www.us-israel.org/jsource/US-Israel/kerry.html ] And what of that OSCE conference on ‘anti-Semitism’ to which both Kerry and Bush referred in such glowing terms? Attended by representatives of 55 nations, many of them dependent on US/Zionist favor for their economic survival, it marked the agreement of those governments to ‘root out’ all criticism of Jews, continue their efforts to criminalize such criticism, and begin the most extensive internal surveillance and spying operation ever known, to be directed against their own citizens suspected of being aware of the issue of Jewish supremacism. According to the New Jersey Jewish News, at the conference "European governments acknowledged that much of the current anti-Semitism revival hides behind criticism of Israel. …Several congressional participants praised the work of the conference, but warned that the meeting is only the first step in combating a problem that continues to grow." One of those US Congressmen attending the event was New Jersey’s Republican Representative Chris Smith, who said "When national leaders fail to denounce anti-Semitic violence and slurs, the void is not only demoralizing to the victims, but silence actually enables the wrongdoing. Silence by elected officials in particular conveys approval – or at least acquiescence – and can contribute to a climate of fear and a sense of vulnerability. …we hope the results of this conference will serve as a blueprint for serious and hopefully bold action. Our words here in Berlin, however, must be repeated at home with frequency, passion, and tenacity and matched – and even exceeded – by deeds." Laszlo Kovacs, the foreign minister of Hungary, told the OSCE meeting "There can be no tolerance of extremist hate speech. We will not tolerate it in parliament, in meetings, on the streets, squares or football stadiums." By "extremist hate speech" they now mean criticism of Israel, Zionism, or Jewish power. They do not mean and will not punish Jewish supremacists when they declare their hatred of White people or others, nor will they punish the Jewish funding and promotion of policies which are leading directly to genocide of the … read more »

Response:

Rachel Corrie!! - MARTYR or ROADKILL? Photo of Saint Rachel destroying U.S. flag and teaching the little children of Gaza how to show their hatred for America:

America is ruled by the Jew devils. US aid to Israel – Tax Dollars Soaked in Blood by Susan Abulhawa With 400 Palestinians killed and over 10,000 wounded (most of them severely), the Israeli lobby is requesting a new pile of American tax dollars ($450 million) for ‘emergency aid.’ Part of this money is being requested to compensate Israel for withdrawing from a 20 year occupation of Southern Lebanon. Excuse me! Israel invaded Lebanon, used the world banned cluster bombs to kill 20,000 civilians (stories that would make your skin crawl), destroyed the countries infrastructure and occupied its people for two decades. Now they want to be compensated for finally obeying international law and getting out of land where they have no business being? If anyone ought to be compensated, it’s the Lebanese people. At any rate, its not the responsibility of the American tax payer to pay up. Israel is an outlaw state in violation of numerous UN Resolution and various tenets of international laws. Congress should stop behaving as though we’re some kind of Israeli colony bowing to her every whim. Israel, whose population is 0.1% of the total world population gets roughly one-third of all US foreign aid. In addition to the $5,000,000,000 in aid, Israel enjoys the benefits of a whole lot more US tax payer money. For example, there are special "gifts" like the Arrow Missile and Levi Fighter, totaling $1.3 billion. Tax payers must also pay interest on money borrowed for Israel’s grants– about $500 million per year. Private donations to Israel are tax-deductible and total about $1 billion annually. This does not include the Israeli bonds sold in the US for $500 million each year. Despite US restrictions on using money to build illegal settlements on Palestinian land, Israel has spent hundreds of millions of our dollars importing Jews from across the world, confiscating Palestinian land and demolishing their homes to make way for brand new settlements for the new arrivals. That’s not all. The US also pays Egypt $2.1 billion/year for signing a peace treaty with Israel and is asked to pay umpteen billions of tax payer dollars every time Israel notions that is will consider a pull-back from occupied territories. For example, during peace talks with Syria, Israel demanded that the US foot a bill of $17 billion for its withdrawal from the Golan Heights, where it has illegally been occupying Syrian land and stealing Syrian resources for over 33 years. Basically, the US taxpayers have to pay Israel in order for Israel to obey international law and respect the sovereignty of other nations. At the same time Congress cut the welfare budget by $5.3 billions, aid to Israel that year was $5.2 billion. Indeed, as filmmaker Tom Hayes said: "from the mouths of America’s poor onto the necks of Palestinians." The so called "peace process" is sure to cost us yet more tens of billions of dollars in payment for Israel’s insatiable appetite for Arab soil and its unrelenting thievery of other’s resources. Try getting an iota of that money for your state. You’re lucky if you can hold onto school lunch programs. Of course, some of that money trickles back to the US in the form of campaign funding. These campaign "donations" account for Israel’s power over US foreign policies. So, what has Israel done for us? Israel has spied on the US. By the way, a contribution to the ‘free Jonathan Pollard’ fund is tax deductible. According to the CIA, Israel commits industrial espionage against American businesses. They have exported sensitive US technology to other countries, some of which are potentially hostile to the U.S., in direct contravention of U.S. law. In 1967 Israel attacked the USS Liberty killing 34 American crewmen and wounding 171. Despite thirty three years of unrelenting pleas from the survivors of that ship, Congress will not afford our servicemen the decency of an investigation and has refused to hold a Congressional hearing for an act of aggression against Americans in a time of peace despite astounding evidence. Maybe they will when there are no more survivors to speak and the only testimonies will come from Israeli-chosen "witnesses." http://www.halcyon.com/jim/ussliberty/ Israel has a healthy economy and gets piles of money and other aid from Germany every year. If this US-Israel marriage is indeed in our best interest then why do they need such a strong well-funded lobby in our Congress? Continuing to be the lone veto that keeps the international community from investigating Israel’s breaches of the Fourth Geneva Convention cannot possibly be in our best interest. Patting Israel on the back while the rest of the world condemns it’s flagrant violations of human rights does not mesh with the principles on which this country was founded. Retired Navy Admiral, Thomas Moorer, was quoted in a book by Paul Findley, former congressman from Illinois, as saying "I’ve never seen an president- I don’t care who he is- stand up to [the Israelis]. It just boggles your mind*.If the American people understood what a grip those people have got on our government, they would rise up in arms." www.spearhead-uk.com http://www.natvan.com http://www.altermedia.info/ www.nsm88.com

Response:

Tiptoeing around Our Problems By Dr. William Pierce Dr. William Pierce is a member of the American Nazi Party and once was associated with George Lincoln Rockwell, and as such is one of the most UN-American monsters that ever lived.

Here is part of Hitler’s speech at Rheinmetall-Borsig Works, Berlin, on December 10, 1940: "In this Anglo-French world there exists, as it were, democracy, which means the rule of the people by the people. Now the people must possess some means of giving expression to their thoughts or their wishes. Examining this problem more closely, we see that the people themselves have originally no convictions of their own. Their convictions are formed, of course, just as everywhere else. The decisive question is who enlightens the people, who educates them? In those countries, it is actually capital that rules; that is, nothing more than a clique of a few hundred men who possess untold wealth and, as a consequence of the peculiar structure of their national life, are more or less independent and free. They say: ‘Here we have liberty.’ By this they mean, above all, an uncontrolled economy, and by an uncontrolled economy, the freedom not only to acquire capital but to make absolutely free use of it. That means freedom from national control or control by the people both in the acquisition of capital and in its employment. This is really what they mean when they speak of liberty. These capitalists create their own press and then speak of the ‘freedom of the press.’ In reality, every one of the newspapers has a master, and in every case this master is the capitalist, the owner. This master, not the editor, is the one who directs the policy of the paper. If the editor tries to write other than what suits the master, he is ousted the next day. This press, which is the absolutely submissive and characterless slave of the owners, molds public opinion. Public opinion thus mobilized by them is, in its turn, split up into political parties. The difference between these parties is as small as it formerly was in Germany. You know them, of course – the old parties. They were always one and the same. In Britain matters are usually so arranged that families are divided up, one member being a conservative, another a liberal, and a third belonging to the labor party. Actually, all three sit together as members of the family, decide upon their common attitude and determine it. A further point is that the ‘elected people’ actually form a community which operates and controls all these organizations. For this reason, the opposition in England is really always the same, for on all essential matters in which the opposition has to make itself felt, the parties are always in agreement. They have one and the same conviction and through the medium of the press mold public opinion along corresponding lines. One might well believe that in these countries of liberty and riches, the people must possess an unlimited degree of prosperity. But no! On the contrary, it is precisely in these countries that the distress of the masses is greater than anywhere else. Such is the case in ‘rich Britain.’ She controls sixteen million square miles. In India, for example, a hundred million colonial workers with a wretched standard of living must labor for her. One might think, perhaps, that at least in England itself every person must have his share of these riches. By no means! In that country class distinction is the crassest imaginable. There is poverty – incredible poverty – on the one side, and equally incredible wealth on the other. They have not solved a single problem. The workmen of that country which possesses more than one-sixth of the globe and of the world’s natural resources dwell in misery, and the masses of the people are poorly clad.. In a country which ought to have more than enough bread and every sort of fruit, we find millions of the lower classes who have not even enough to fill their stomachs, and go about hungry. A nation which could provide work for the whole world must acknowledge the fact that it cannot even abolish unemployment at home. For decades this rich Britain has had two and a half million unemployed; rich America, ten to thirteen millions, year after year; France, six, seven, and eight hundred thousand. Well, my fellow-countrymen – what then are we to say about ourselves? It is self-evident that where this democracy rules, the people as such are not taken into consideration at all. The only thing that matters is the existence of a few hundred gigantic capitalists who own all the factories and their stock and, through them, control the people. The masses of the people do not interest them in the least. They are interested in them just as were our bourgeois parties in former times – only when elections are being held, when they need votes. Otherwise, the life of the masses is a matter of complete indifference to them. To this must be added the difference in education. Is it not ludicrous to hear a member of the British Labor Party – who, of course, as a member of the Opposition is officially paid by the government – say: ‘When the war is over, we will do something in social respects’? It is the members of Parliament who are the directors of the business concerns – just as used to be the case with us. But we have abolished all that. A member of the Reichstag cannot belong to a Board of Directors, except as a purely honorary member. He is prohibited from accepting any emolument, financial or otherwise. This is not the case in other countries. They reply: ‘That is why our form of government is sacred to us.’ I can well believe it, for that form of government certainly pays very well.. But whether it is sacred to the mass of the people as well is another matter. The people as a whole definitely suffer. I do not consider it possible in the long run for one man to work and toil for a whole year in return for ridiculous wages, while another jumps into an express train once a year and pockets enormous sums. Such conditions are a disgrace. On the other hand, we National Socialists equally oppose the theory that all men are equals. Today, when a man of genius makes some astounding invention and enormously benefits his country by his brains, we pay him his due, for he has really accomplished something and been of use to his country. However, we hope to make it impossible for idle drones to inhabit this country. I could continue to cite examples indefinitely. The fact remains that two worlds are face to face with one another. Our opponents are quite right when they say: ‘Nothing can reconcile us to the National Socialist world.’ How could a narrow-minded capitalist ever agree to my principles? It would be easier for the Devil to go to church and cross himself with holy water than for these people to comprehend the ideas which are accepted facts to us today. But we have solved our problems. To take another instance where we are condemned: They claim to be fighting for the maintenance of the gold standard as the currency basis. That I can well believe, for the gold is in their hands. We, too, once had gold, but it was stolen and extorted from us. When I came to power, it was not malice which made me abandon the gold standard. Germany simply had no gold left. Consequently, quitting the gold standard presented no difficulties, for it is always easy to part with what one does not have. We had no gold. We had no foreign exchange. They had all been stolen and extorted from us during the previous fifteen years. But, my fellow countrymen, I did not regret it, for we have constructed our economic system on a wholly different basis. In our eyes, gold is not of value in itself. It is only an agent by which nations can be suppressed and dominated. When I took over the government, I had only one hope on which to build, namely, the efficiency and ability of the German nation and the German workingman; the intelligence of our inventors, engineers, technicians, chemists, and so forth. I built on the strength which animates our economic system. One simple question faced me: Are we to perish because we have no gold; am I to believe in a phantom which spells our destruction? I championed the opposite opinion: Even though we have no gold, we have capacity for work. The German capacity for work is our gold and our capital, and with this gold I can compete successfully with any power in the world. We want to live in houses which have to be built. Hence, the workers must build them, and the raw materials required must be procured by work. My whole economic system has been built up on the conception of work. We have solved our problems while, amazingly enough, the capitalist countries and their currencies have suffered bankruptcy. Sterling can find no market today. Throw it at any one and he will step aside to avoid being hit. But our Reichsmark, which is backed by no gold, has remained stable. Why? It has no gold cover; it is backed by you and by your work. You have helped me to keep the mark stable. German currency, with no gold coverage, is worth more today than gold itself. It signifies unceasing production. This we owe to the German farmer, who has worked from daybreak till nightfall. This we owe to the German worker, who has given us his whole strength. The whole problem has been solved in one instant, as if by magic. My dear friends, if I had stated publicly eight or nine years ago: ‘In seven or eight years the problem of how to provide work for the unemployed will be solved, and the problem then will be where to find workers,’ I should have harmed my cause. Every one would have declared: ‘The man is mad. It is useless to talk to him, much less to support him. Nobody should vote for him. He is a fantastic … read more »

Response:

Tiptoeing around Our Problems By Dr. William Pierce

Dr. William Pierce is a member of the American Nazi Party and once was associated with George Lincoln Rockwell, and as such is one of the most UN-American monsters that ever lived. Anything written by him should be taken for the lunatic writing that it is. <Imitation of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf deservedly flushed To Mr. Pierce (if he is reading this): If you don’t like American policy, you are more than welcome to leave. The sooner the better. You are NOT an American. Indeed, you are not a human being!

Response:

You know nobody reads that shit don’t you. Jim E

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Rachel Corrie Photo of Saint Rachel destroying U.S. flag and teaching the little children of Gaza how to show their hatred for America: America is a colony of the Jews and exists only to serve the Jews. Tons of horse shit flushed Hey you one trick pony She sucked up to arab terrorists, and got squashed like the bug she was. End of story. See how short it can be if you leave out all the crap?

You will regret and you will be sorry To ridicule the death of Rachel Cory She stood alone against brutal Zion They crushed her but could not kill the story Children dead with demolished homes Will drag you one day to a heavenly jury You’ll curse bulldozers and your laughter When Hell unleashes her endless fury Damn your wickedness, damn your lies She was Jesus, she was Mary

Response:

I just spilled my coffee… — ( W W P D ) – What Would Patton Do? http://www.marianland.com/Patton/PattononTerrorists.gif

Response:

Rachel Corrie!! - MARTYR or ROADKILL? Photo of Saint Rachel destroying U.S. flag and teaching the little children of Gaza how to show their hatred for America: http://homepage.mac.com/cfj/.Pictures/rachel-corrie-flagburner.jpg http://homepage.mac.com/cfj/.Pictures/rachel-corrie-flag-02.jpg Then: http://lindasog.com/fr-images/dozer.gif Rachel’s Homecoming: http://home.sc.rr.com/jbernick/rc_rip.jpg Now, she looks like this to me: http://neworleans.indymedia.org/uploads/corrie_urinal.jpg Or this: http://webpages.charter.net/timandlauren/RCorrie.gif They commemorated Rachel: http://home.sc.rr.com/jbernick/rc_stamp.jpg The dozer’s union said: http://home.sc.rr.com/jbernick/speedup.jpg You see this image a lot, and it’s patently fake. http://www.indybay.org/uploads/capt_1047858810_mideast_israel_protest… The shadows are wrong, and the guy on the right has no feet. There’s nothing honest about the Corries or their partners in crime. New product opportunities for Rachel’s family: http://civilwarclipart.com/Clipartgallery/images/SaintJemima.jpg http://civilwarclipart.com/Clipartgallery/images/tonka-corrie.jpg Poems were written: There’s danger out on the nations’ roads They’re paved with snakes and flattened toads, And soldiers drive in bulldozers so big They can flatten a cow, or a horse, or a manatee And those who survive are a lucky few, But there’s one brave activist who made it through And I’m here to tell the tale to you of Sailcorrie Sailcorrie? Sailcorrie! She was protesting with rage in her face, When strange radiation from outer space Turned her into a super invincible activist When a bulldozer ran her down with a hideous splat! Ah, she couldn’t be killed, but she still could be squished And she lay in the passing lane shakin’ her fist Then some kids helped her fly with a flick of the wrist And that was the birth of Sailcorrie Sailcorrie! Sailcorrie! She rolled after that bulldozer like a buzz saw unleashed, And she sliced it in two like a knife through a peach One bulldozer half took the high road, the other the low And the message went out on CB radio. Breaker, breaker, lookout, watch your back Be afraid there’s a Frisbee-like activist who’s a mighty sharp blade. So the feared and revered reputation was made of Sailcorrie Sailcorrie! Sailcorrie! She’s been known to cut redwoods and stop a whole fleet, When a fam’ly of tapeworms was crossin’ the street And when Mom’s having trouble with Thanksgiving plans She has even dropped by to help open some cans Or when someone’s depressed or has had a bad day, She unerringly knows just the right things to say Don’t be depressed. People love you because you’re a stupid America-hating activist. Go with it! Then she’ll ask for a toss, and be on her way She’s Sailcorrie! Sailcorrie! Songs: Come a Little Bit Closer (Rachel Corrie taunts the bulldozer) Click Below and Sing Along! http://www.hklook.com/midi/eng77.mid MIDI – COME A LITTLE BIT CLOSER In a PLO town was a girl named Rachel Corrie She was reading to children anti-American stories She was brainwashed by mom and dad By a college professor was had But one day she would run out of luck and things turned out ba-a-ad Hello, Mr. Bulldozer, you can’t touch this house…I’ll stand in your way Hello, Mr. Bulldozer, Jews must be stopped…this will not be your day She was burning our flag with the little terrorists cheering And to the scum of the earth she became someone who’s quite endearing She was brainwashed by her mom and dad By a college professor was had But one day she would run out of luck and things turned out ba-a-ad Hello, Mr. Bulldozer, you can’t touch this house…I’ll stand in your way Hello, Mr. Bulldozer, Jews must be stopped…this will not be your day You must wear a hard hat when you work around big equipment She became a squished pancake…I hope that isn’t too flippant She was brainwashed by mom and dad By a college professor was had But one day she would run out of luck and things turned out ba-a-ad Hello, Mr. Bulldozer, you can’t touch this house…I’ll stand in your way Hello, Mr. Bulldozer, Jews must be stopped…this will not be your day By the way, these pictures have been shown to be a hoax. Rachel Corrie "before" the accident (International Solidarity Movement) http://lindasog.com/corrie/corbefor.jpg After the accident (International Solidarity Movement) http://lindasog.com/corrie/corafter.jpg The "before" picture shows Rachel standing in front of the bulldozer with a megaphone, some distance away and foreshortened by perspective, making her appear to be in clear sight of the bulldozer. The presentation also makes it appear that this took place immediately before the incident. However, the photographer himself later admitted that no one with a camera had been present at the site just before Rachel’s accident, that the picture with the megaphone had actually been taken hours earlier, and that at the time of the accident Rachel was not in sight of the driver. An examination of the pictures themselves, noting, for example, the difference in the color of the sky, shows they could not have been taken close to the same point in time (1). In addition, the bulldozers shown in these supposed "before" and "after" pictures are not the same (2). http://israelbehindthenews.com/Archives/Mar-21-03.htm#image http://www.honestreporting.com/articles/critiques/Rachel_Corrie3_Cont… Indeed both CNN, which ran the two pictures, and the New York Times, which ran the first one, published the following corrections: CNN, March 25, 2003: Caption clarification: Photos by an International Solidarity Movement eyewitness show Rachel Corrie protesting earlier, and then later, after she was hit by an Israeli bulldozer in Gaza on Sunday (3). The New York Times, March 26, 2003: http://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/03/16/rafah.death/index.html A picture caption on March 17 with an article about an American protester who was crushed by an Israeli Army bulldozer in Gaza referred incorrectly to the bulldozer shown. It was one that the protester, Rachel Corrie, had earlier tried to stop from destroying a Palestinian home. It was not the one that killed her (4).Nevertheless pro-Palestinian web sites, including the International Solidarity Movement’s own web site, continue to present the two pictures with incorrect and misleading labels. http://www.nytimes.com/2003/03/26/pageoneplus/corrections.html?ex=104… Rachel Wallpaper: http://webpages.charter.net/timandlauren/tonka.JPG Who killed Rachel Corrie? Dennis Prager http://freerepublic.com/focus/news/1091843/printdp20030325.shtml Rachel Corrie, the Olympia, Wash., college student killed trying to protect a Palestinian house — a house, remember, not even a human being — against an Israeli bulldozer, will probably not merit a footnote in history books. That’s too bad, because her life and death, the way she has been portrayed in some media, and the reactions of her college are powerful examples of an America with many morally confused individuals. A Seattle Times columnist described her as a martyr. Her hometown paper, The Olympian, published numerous pictures of a sweet-looking woman from childhood on. It omitted the one photo of Rachel Corrie that USA Today, to its credit, published — Corrie screaming anti-American invective while burning an American flag in Gaza. Anyone with a heart must extend the deepest condolences to Rachel Corrie’s parents. But anyone with a conscience must regard Rachel Corrie’s activities with contempt. One hopes that it is not asking too much of people to entertain simultaneously two conflicting emotions — grief for the parents and contempt for the daughter. Rachel Corrie chose to side with a society that breeds some of the cruelest murderers of innocent people in the world. Rachel Corrie gave her life trying to protect people whose declared aim is to annihilate another country. In the name of saving children’s lives, Rachel Corrie chose to defend a society that teaches its young children to blow themselves up and which deliberately targets children for death. And Rachel Corrie went to America’s enemies to burn her country’s flag. She was one of the many fools our colleges annually produce. Evergreen State College is reputed to excel in such production. Is anyone aware of a single student or faculty member who repudiated her activities? We are told repeatedly that Rachel was idealistic — as if that matters. Virtually every person who commits great evil — the Nazi, the Communist, the Islamic terrorist — is idealistic. Idealism is morally neutral. It is good only when directed to good ends. But in young people, idealism is at least as likely to lead to bad as to good because few young people are wise — and idealism without wisdom is very dangerous. We are told ad nauseam that Rachel Corrie was a "peace activist." So let it be said once and for all that most of these people are moral frauds. Why? Because "peace activists" routinely protest only against peaceful countries. Has there been one Evergreen State or other "peace activist" in Sudan during its Islamic government’s slaughter and enslavement of millions of blacks? Are there any "peace activists" in Tibet to protect its unique culture from being eradicated by the Communist Chinese? Did you notice any "peace activists" trying to save the millions of North Koreans dying at the hands of their lunatic government? Of course not. Rachel Corrie and other "peace activists" only target peace-loving Israel and America. Why do they do so? Here is one answer. The world is filled with evil, and young idealists like Rachel Corrie don’t like it. Which is lovely. But they don’t confront real evil because they know they will get hurt. That’s one reason there are no "peace activists" or … read more »

Response:

Rachel Corrie Photo of Saint Rachel destroying U.S. flag and teaching the little children of Gaza how to show their hatred for America: America is a colony of the Jews and exists only to serve the Jews.

Tons of horse shit flushed Hey you one trick pony She sucked up to arab terrorists, and got squashed like the bug she was. End of story. See how short it can be if you leave out all the crap? Jim E

Response:

I really wish we wouldn’t start these discussions again. I want to let her rest. Norma Last I heard she was still resting. Now, this IS funny!

Not really, she is still before the public and inciting very unpleasant images and silly hatred. She was a deluded, immature little girl, and I would like to never see her used as a martye again. Norma PS Unless you agree with Tores D – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – TK9

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I really wish we wouldn’t start these discussions again. I want to let her rest. Norma Last I heard she was still resting. Now, this IS funny! I would like to never see her used as a martyr again.

She won’t be used as a martyr again. SHE’S DEAD…. :) — ( W W P D ) – What Would Patton Do? http://www.marianland.com/Patton/PattononTerrorists.gif

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I really wish we wouldn’t start these discussions again. I want to let her rest. Norma Last I heard she was still resting. Now, this IS funny! Not really, she is still before the public and inciting very unpleasant images and silly hatred. She was a deluded, immature little girl, and I would like to never see her used as a martye again. Norma PS Unless you agree with Tores D

It’s all right, Professor, We already knew that your sense of humor was largely impared… TK9

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I really wish we wouldn’t start these discussions again. I want to let her rest. Norma Last I heard she was still resting. Now, this IS funny! Not really, she is still before the public and inciting very unpleasant images and silly hatred. She was a deluded, immature little girl, and I would like to never see her used as a martye again. Norma PS Unless you agree with Tores D It’s all right, Professor, We already knew that your sense of humor was largely impared…

Only when it comes to you! Norma – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – TK9

Response:

Tiptoeing around Our Problems By Dr. William Pierce "We’ve been talking about the very dangerous situation in the Middle East recently, just because so much is happening there, and undoubtedly we’ll be talking about it much more in the future. For that reason I want to make very clear what my motives and sympathies are, lest I lead anyone astray and be thought a hypocrite for doing so. First, regarding Palestine: although my sympathies definitely lie with the Palestinians rather than with the Jews, it is not horror at what the Jews are doing to the Palestinians that motivates me. What motivates me is horror that my country is being used by the Jews in their war against the Palestinians. If America were not involved at all in the Middle East I still would sympathize with the Palestinians and I would wish that they could be successful in driving the Jews into the sea and annihilating the abomination that is Israel, but that conflict between Jews and Palestinians would not be a major concern for me. At least, my concern there would be dwarfed by my concern for problems more directly involving my own people in America and in Europe and in southern Africa. Even now, with money and weapons being supplied by America and used to slaughter Palestinians, my concern is much less with monsters like Ariel Sharon who are doing the slaughtering than it is with the filthy creatures among my own people in America who are collaborating with Jews here to keep the weapons and money flowing to Sharon — and are ready to do whatever else the Jews require of them here or abroad. So when I tell you about Jews in occupied Palestine shooting Palestinian children, and disapproval and anger are evident in my voice, what I really am angry about is that the American people, my people, are being used for this murderous activity. I am angry that America’s whole foreign policy has been perverted to serve Jewish interests at the expense of American interests. I am angry that America’s political system has been perverted to ensure that we always have so-called "leaders," whether Democrat or Republican, who are dependent on the Jewish media or Jewish money or both for their election and consequently will do the bidding of the Jews. I am angry that our whole government is riddled with Jews — Jews in our Defense Department, Jews in our State Department, Jews in our Immigration and Naturalization Service, Jews in our Justice Department, Jews in the President’s speech-writing staff — who really set the policies of our government behind the scenes, while the politicians are out front in the spotlight making speeches and kissing babies — and doing as they’re told by the Jews behind the scenes. Did you know that it was a Jewish speechwriter, David Frum, who put the phrase "axis of evil" in George Bush’s mouth to justify America’s ongoing war against Israel’s enemies? Did you know that a clique of Jews in the Defense Department and among George Bush’s foreign policy advisers are the people actually running the so-called "war on terror" in Afghanistan: a war that they intend to expand to Iraq and any other Middle Eastern country that gets uppity, in order to make that part of the world safe for Israel at American expense? Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld is a front man for his nominal subordinates, Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz and Deputy Undersecretary of Defense for Policy Douglas Feith; and George Bush’s official foreign policy adviser, Condoleezza Rice, helps him meet his Black quota for the Cabinet, but it is the Jew Richard Perle, chairman of Bush’s Defense Policy Board, who gives him his foreign policy directives. As I’ve said on more than one occasion, George Bush is a feckless nincompoop who couldn’t come up with a defense policy or a foreign policy on his own if he had to — which is why he’s President. The real policymakers behind the scenes certainly don’t want a man in the White House who has ideas of his own, because those ideas might conflict with theirs. And it is nothing but empty sophistry to make a distinction between Jews in Israel, such as Ariel Sharon and Simon Peres, and the Jews in Mr. Bush’s administration formulating his policies or the Jews controlling our mass media. They all are Jews, and that’s what really matters. There are many knowledgeable Americans besides me who think that it’s not a good thing to have Jews using America to advance Israel’s interests at the expense of America’s interests. They know how the system works: how the Jews exert their control through money and media and a well-entrenched network of Jewish operatives, such as Wolfowitz and Feith and Perle. And many of these knowledgeable Americans also understand how Jewish subterfuge and deceit work: they understand that the Jews throw up a lot of smoke to conceal their control and make it appear that they have much less influence than they actually do. Despite this degree of understanding that many knowledgeable Americans have, there seem to be very few who are willing or able to draw the necessary conclusions. What I keep seeing are comments about the need to get the so-called "peace process" going again in the Middle East, and how there are hardline supporters of Israel who are obstructing the "peace process" because they think that it will give too much to the Palestinians or will compromise Israel’s security, or whatever. These knowledgeable Americans seem to believe that if we could just get around the Jewish hardliners somehow — if we could just neutralize Jews such as Wolfowitz and Feith and Perle; if Ariel Sharon could be replaced by a "moderate" Jewish prime minister — then the "peace process" could proceed, America could gradually reduce its involvement in helping the Jews keep the Palestinians repressed, and eventually Israel no longer would be using America, and everything would be rosy. And so these knowledgeable Americans expend all of their wit and energy in these trivial pursuits. Listen! Do you know what the most hopeful aspect of the conflict between Jews and Palestinians is now? It is the ongoing radicalization of the Muslim masses throughout the whole Middle East. The collaborator governments in Pakistan, in Egypt, in Saudi Arabia are terrified of the reaction they see among their own people to what Ariel Sharon is doing to the Palestinians. When Sharon’s Jewish troops shoot Palestinian children, Muslim mobs riot, and governments that now collaborate with the United States quake. Ariel Sharon is the best thing that has happened in the Middle East in the last 54 years. The Palestinian tactic of suicide bombing is being denounced by every politician and every media spokesman over here now. It’s nothing but terrorism, they all say. There’s no justification at all for suicide bombing, they tell us. Of course, whenever you hear that sort of unanimity from the politicians and the media people you should be suspicious. In fact, suicide bombing is the best tactic for the Palestinians to use now, because it provokes the Jews to step up reprisals. And the reprisals radicalize the masses in every country in the Middle East. If just one of the collaborator governments falls, the spines of all the rest will be stiffened, and the Bush government will be far less likely to find collaborators for building its so-called "coalition" to do the will of the Jews in the Middle East. Suicide bombers now hardly put a dent in the population of five million Jews in occupied Palestine, and Sharon’s bloody reprisals hardly put a dent in the overall Palestinian population. But if conflict of this sort continues until just one collaborator government is overthrown, that ultimately will be worth more than ten thousand successful suicide bombings in which only 20 or so Jews are killed each time. In the long run there can be no real peace in the Middle East and no end to America’s shameful role there — and no future for the Palestinian people — as long as there is an Israel. There seems to be a better understanding of these things among knowledgeable Palestinians than among knowledgeable Americans. Shallow thinking and the pursuit of trivial goals is even worse among knowledgeable Americans when it comes to domestic problems. They really do not want to grasp these problems with both hands and deal with them in a forthright way. Look, for example, at what uncontrolled immigration has done and is doing to America. And what do knowledgeable Americans propose to do about that? Very little, really. They make much of the fact that several of the al-Qaeda hijackers who carried out the September 11 attack were in the United States only because of very lax immigration policies, and so that’s a good reason for tightening up the policies. How about simply rounding up all illegal aliens immediately — all 12 million of them — and booting them and all of their offspring out of the country without further ado? Oh, no, no, no! We can’t do that! Why not? Well, the media never would stand for it. The media would be all over anyone who even proposed a mass expulsion of illegal aliens. They would denounce any political leader who tried to do that as a "racist" and a "neo-Nazi." And so knowledgeable Americans, who understand the immigration disaster quite well, continue tiptoeing around it, afraid to do or even say anything really significant about it: terrified even to think about really radical solutions that might actually end the problem. And it’s the same with the rest of our domestic problems. Lots of people understand these problems and are worried about them, but they won’t tackle them in any significant way. They let the Jews — the Jewish media and Jewish money and the entrenched Jewish network — have their way, for all practical purposes. Why? Why are the Jews permitted to get away with all of their destructive policies and activities without being challenged or opposed in any significant way? Part of the reason is that the Jews are very … read more »

Response:

Snip Like most others–I never got "the rest of the story" as Paul Harvey might say. What a nutsack. This appears to have been a female version of Michael Moore–only stupider. At least Michael Moore is sly enough to get other dupes like this gal to do his bidding. I just don’t understand–the look on her face in some of these photos as she burns the flag is so visceral. Where did this hate come from–not spoiled to her content back home? Glad my kids didn’t turn out like this. No pride in raising a useful idiot–may she rest in peace.

Response:

Rachel Corrie Photo of Saint Rachel destroying U.S. flag and teaching the little children of Gaza how to show their hatred for America:

America is a colony of the Jews and exists only to serve the Jews. An Israeli Bulldozer killed an American student, Rachel Corrie, trying to stop the destruction of Palestinian homes. Excerpts from an e-mail from Rachel Corrie to her family on February 7, 2003 from the Gaza Strip. I have been in Palestine for two weeks and one hour now, and I still have very few words to describe what I see. It is most difficult for me to think about what’s going on here when I sit down to write back to the United States–something about the virtual portal into luxury. I don’t know if many of the children here have ever existed without tank-shell holes in their walls and the towers of an occupying army surveying them constantly from the near horizons. I think, although I’m not entirely sure, that even the smallest of these children understand that life is not like this everywhere. An eight-year-old was shot and killed by an Israeli tank two days before I got here, and many of the children murmur his name to me, Ali–or point at the posters of him on the walls. The children also love to get me to practice my limited Arabic by asking me "Kaif Sharon?" "Kaif Bush?" and they laugh when I say "Bush Majnoon" "Sharon Majnoon" back in my limited Arabic. (How is Sharon? How is Bush? Bush is crazy. Sharon is crazy.) Of course this isn’t quite what I believe, and some of the adults who have the English correct me: Bush mish Majnoon… Bush is a businessman. Today I tried to learn to say "Bush is a tool", but I don’t think it translated quite right. But anyway, there are eight-year- olds here much more aware of the workings of the global power structure than I was just a few years ago–at least regarding Israel. Nevertheless, I think about the fact that no amount of reading, attendance at conferences, documentary viewing and word of mouth could have prepared me for the reality of the situation here. You just can’t imagine it unless you see it, and even then you are always well aware that your experience is not at all the reality: what with the difficulties the Israeli Army would face if they shot an unarmed US citizen, and with the fact that I have money to buy water when the army destroys wells, and, of course, the fact that I have the option of leaving. Nobody in my family has been shot, driving in their car, by a rocket launcher from a tower at the end of a major street in my hometown. I have a home. I am allowed to go see the ocean. Ostensibly it is still quite difficult for me to be held for months or years on end without a trial (this because I am a white US citizen, as opposed to so many others). When I leave for school or work I can be relatively certain that there will not be a heavily armed soldier waiting half way between Mud Bay and downtown Olympia at a checkpoint?a soldier with the power to decide whether I can go about my business, and whether I can get home again when I’m done. So, if I feel outrage at arriving and entering briefly and incompletely into the world in which these children exist, I wonder conversely about how it would be for them to arrive in my world. They know that children in the United States don’t usually have their parents shot and they know they sometimes get to see the ocean. But once you have seen the ocean and lived in a silent place, where water is taken for granted and not stolen in the night by bulldozers, and once you have spent an evening when you haven’t wondered if the walls of your home might suddenly fall inward waking you from your sleep, and once you’ve met people who have never lost anyone– once you have experienced the reality of a world that isn’t surrounded by murderous towers, tanks, armed "settlements" and now a giant metal wall, I wonder if you can forgive the world for all the years of your childhood spent existing–just existing–in resistance to the constant stranglehold of the world’s fourth largest military–backed by the world’s only superpower–in it’s attempt to erase you from your home. That is something I wonder about these children. I wonder what would happen if they really knew. As an afterthought to all this rambling, I am in Rafah, a city of about 140,000 people, approximately 60 percent of whom are refugees– many of whom are twice or three times refugees. Rafah existed prior to 1948, but most of the people here are themselves or are descendants of people who were relocated here from their homes in historic Palestine–now Israel. Rafah was split in half when the Sinai returned to Egypt. Currently, the Israeli army is building a fourteen-meter-high wall between Rafah in Palestine and the border, carving a no-mans land from the houses along the border. Six hundred and two homes have been completely bulldozed according to the Rafah Popular Refugee Committee. The number of homes that have been partially destroyed is greater. Today as I walked on top of the rubble where homes once stood, Egyptian soldiers called to me from the other side of the border, "Go! Go!" because a tank was coming. Followed by waving and "what’s your name?". There is something disturbing about this friendly curiosity. It reminded me of how much, to some degree, we are all kids curious about other kids: Egyptian kids shouting at strange women wandering into the path of tanks. Palestinian kids shot from the tanks when they peak out from behind walls to see what’s going on. International kids standing in front of tanks with banners. Israeli kids in the tanks anonymously, occasionally shouting– and also occasionally waving–many forced to be here, many just aggressive, shooting into the houses as we wander away. In addition to the constant presence of tanks along the border and in the western region between Rafah and settlements along the coast, there are more IDF towers here than I can count–along the horizon,at the end of streets. Some just army green metal. Others these strange spiral staircases draped in some kind of netting to make the activity within anonymous. Some hidden,just beneath the horizon of buildings. A new one went up the other day in the time it took us to do laundry and to cross town twice to hang banners. Despite the fact that some of the areas nearest the border are the original Rafah with families who have lived on this land for at least a century, only the 1948 camps in the center of the city are Palestinian controlled areas under Oslo. But as far as I can tell, there are few if any places that are not within the sights of some tower or another. Certainly there is no place invulnerable to apache helicopters or to the cameras of invisible drones we hear buzzing over the city for hours at a time. I’ve been having trouble accessing news about the outside world here, but I hear an escalation of war on Iraq is inevitable. There is a great deal of concern here about the "reoccupation of Gaza." Gaza is reoccupied every day to various extents, but I think the fear is that the tanks will enter all the streets and remain here, instead of entering some of the streets and then withdrawing after some hours or days to observe and shoot from the edges of the communities. If people aren’t already thinking about the consequences of this war for the people of the entire region then I hope they will start. I also hope you’ll come here. We’ve been wavering between five and six internationals. The neighborhoods that have asked us for some form of presence are Yibna, Tel El Sultan, Hi Salam, Brazil, Block J, Zorob, and Block O. There is also need for constant night- time presence at a well on the outskirts of Rafah since the Israeli army destroyed the two largest wells. According to the municipal water office the wells destroyed last week provided half of Rafah’s water supply. Many of the communities have requested internationals to be present at night to attempt to shield houses from further demolition. After about ten p.m. it is very difficult to move at night because the Israeli army treats anyone in the streets as resistance and shoots at them. So clearly we are too few. I continue to believe that my home, Olympia, could gain a lot and offer a lot by deciding to make a commitment to Rafah in the form of a sister-community relationship. Some teachers and children’s groups have expressed interest in e-mail exchanges, but this is only the tip of the iceberg of solidarity work that might be done. Many people want their voices to be heard, and I think we need to use some of our privilege as internationals to get those voices heard directly in the US, rather than through the filter of well-meaning internationals such as myself. I am just beginning to learn, from what I expect to be a very intense tutelage, about the ability of people to organize against all odds, and to resist against all odds. Thanks for the news I’ve been getting from friends in the US. I just read a report back from a friend who organized a peace group in Shelton, Washington, and was able to be part of a delegation to the large January 18th protest in Washington DC. People here watch the media, and they told me again today that there have been large protests in the United States and "problems for the government" in the UK. So thanks for allowing me to not feel like a complete polyanna when I tentatively tell people here that many people in the United States do not support the policies of our government, and that we are learning from global examples how to resist. www.spearhead-uk.com http://www.natvan.com http://www.altermedia.info/ www.nsm88.com

Response:

I really wish we wouldn’t start these discussions again. I want to let her rest. Norma Last I heard she was still resting.

Now, this IS funny! TK9

Response:

Thanks

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Rachel Corrie Photo of Saint Rachel destroying U.S. flag and teaching the little children of Gaza how to show their hatred for America: http://homepage.mac.com/cfj/.Pictures/rachel-corrie-flagburner.jpg http://homepage.mac.com/cfj/.Pictures/rachel-corrie-flag-02.jpg Then: http://lindasog.com/fr-images/dozer.gif Rachel’s Homecoming: http://home.sc.rr.com/jbernick/rc_rip.jpg Now, she looks like this to me: http://neworleans.indymedia.org/uploads/corrie_urinal.jpg Or this: http://webpages.charter.net/timandlauren/RCorrie.gif They commemorated Rachel: http://home.sc.rr.com/jbernick/rc_stamp.jpg The dozer’s union said: http://home.sc.rr.com/jbernick/speedup.jpg You see this image a lot, and it’s patently fake.

http://www.indybay.org/uploads/capt_1047858810_mideast_israel_protest… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – The shadows are wrong, and the guy on the right has no feet. There’s nothing honest about the Corries or their partners in crime. New product opportunities for Rachel’s family: http://civilwarclipart.com/Clipartgallery/images/SaintJemima.jpg http://civilwarclipart.com/Clipartgallery/images/tonka-corrie.jpg Poems were written: There’s danger out on the nations’ roads They’re paved with snakes and flattened toads, And soldiers drive in bulldozers so big They can flatten a cow, or a horse, or a manatee And those who survive are a lucky few, But there’s one brave activist who made it through And I’m here to tell the tale to you of Sailcorrie Sailcorrie? Sailcorrie! She was protesting with rage in her face, When strange radiation from outer space Turned her into a super invincible activist When a bulldozer ran her down with a hideous splat! Ah, she couldn’t be killed, but she still could be squished And she lay in the passing lane shakin’ her fist Then some kids helped her fly with a flick of the wrist And that was the birth of Sailcorrie Sailcorrie! Sailcorrie! She rolled after that bulldozer like a buzz saw unleashed, And she sliced it in two like a knife through a peach One bulldozer half took the high road, the other the low And the message went out on CB radio. Breaker, breaker, lookout, watch your back Be afraid there’s a Frisbee-like activist who’s a mighty sharp blade. So the feared and revered reputation was made of Sailcorrie Sailcorrie! Sailcorrie! She’s been known to cut redwoods and stop a whole fleet, When a fam’ly of tapeworms was crossin’ the street And when Mom’s having trouble with Thanksgiving plans She has even dropped by to help open some cans Or when someone’s depressed or has had a bad day, She unerringly knows just the right things to say Don’t be depressed. People love you because you’re a stupid America-hating activist. Go with it! Then she’ll ask for a toss, and be on her way She’s Sailcorrie! Sailcorrie! Songs: Come a Little Bit Closer (Rachel Corrie taunts the bulldozer) Click Below and Sing Along! http://www.hklook.com/midi/eng77.mid MIDI – COME A LITTLE BIT CLOSER In a PLO town was a girl named Rachel Corrie She was reading to children anti-American stories She was brainwashed by mom and dad By a college professor was had But one day she would run out of luck and things turned out ba-a-ad Hello, Mr. Bulldozer, you can’t touch this house…I’ll stand in your way Hello, Mr. Bulldozer, Jews must be stopped…this will not be your day She was burning our flag with the little terrorists cheering And to the scum of the earth she became someone who’s quite endearing She was brainwashed by her mom and dad By a college professor was had But one day she would run out of luck and things turned out ba-a-ad Hello, Mr. Bulldozer, you can’t touch this house…I’ll stand in your way Hello, Mr. Bulldozer, Jews must be stopped…this will not be your day You must wear a hard hat when you work around big equipment She became a squished pancake…I hope that isn’t too flippant She was brainwashed by mom and dad By a college professor was had But one day she would run out of luck and things turned out ba-a-ad Hello, Mr. Bulldozer, you can’t touch this house…I’ll stand in your way Hello, Mr. Bulldozer, Jews must be stopped…this will not be your day By the way, these pictures have been shown to be a hoax. Rachel Corrie "before" the accident (International Solidarity Movement) http://lindasog.com/corrie/corbefor.jpg After the accident (International Solidarity Movement) http://lindasog.com/corrie/corafter.jpg The "before" picture shows Rachel standing in front of the bulldozer with a megaphone, some distance away and foreshortened by perspective, making her appear to be in clear sight of the bulldozer. The presentation also makes it appear that this took place immediately before the incident. However, the photographer himself later admitted that no one with a camera had been present at the site just before Rachel’s accident, that the picture with the megaphone had actually been taken hours earlier, and that at the time of the accident Rachel was not in sight of the driver. An examination of the pictures themselves, noting, for example, the difference in the color of the sky, shows they could not have been taken close to the same point in time (1). In addition, the bulldozers shown in these supposed "before" and "after" pictures are not the same (2). http://israelbehindthenews.com/Archives/Mar-21-03.htm#image

http://www.honestreporting.com/articles/critiques/Rachel_Corrie3_Cont… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Indeed both CNN, which ran the two pictures, and the New York Times, which ran the first one, published the following corrections: CNN, March 25, 2003: Caption clarification: Photos by an International Solidarity Movement eyewitness show Rachel Corrie protesting earlier, and then later, after she was hit by an Israeli bulldozer in Gaza on Sunday (3). The New York Times, March 26, 2003: http://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/03/16/rafah.death/index.html A picture caption on March 17 with an article about an American protester who was crushed by an Israeli Army bulldozer in Gaza referred incorrectly to the bulldozer shown. It was one that the protester, Rachel Corrie, had earlier tried to stop from destroying a Palestinian home. It was not the one that killed her (4).Nevertheless pro-Palestinian web sites, including the International Solidarity Movement’s own web site, continue to present the two pictures with incorrect and misleading labels.

http://www.nytimes.com/2003/03/26/pageoneplus/corrections.html?ex=104… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Rachel Wallpaper: http://webpages.charter.net/timandlauren/tonka.JPG Who killed Rachel Corrie? Dennis Prager http://freerepublic.com/focus/news/1091843/printdp20030325.shtml Rachel Corrie, the Olympia, Wash., college student killed trying to protect a Palestinian house — a house, remember, not even a human being — against an Israeli bulldozer, will probably not merit a footnote in history books. That’s too bad, because her life and death, the way she has been portrayed in some media, and the reactions of her college are powerful examples of an America with many morally confused individuals. A Seattle Times columnist described her as a martyr. Her hometown paper, The Olympian, published numerous pictures of a sweet-looking woman from childhood on. It omitted the one photo of Rachel Corrie that USA Today, to its credit, published — Corrie screaming anti-American invective while burning an American flag in Gaza. Anyone with a heart must extend the deepest condolences to Rachel Corrie’s parents. But anyone with a conscience must regard Rachel Corrie’s activities with contempt. One hopes that it is not asking too much of people to entertain simultaneously two conflicting emotions — grief for the parents and contempt for the daughter. Rachel Corrie chose to side with a society that breeds some of the cruelest murderers of innocent people in the world. Rachel Corrie gave her life trying to protect people whose declared aim is to annihilate another country. In the name of saving children’s lives, Rachel Corrie chose to defend a society that teaches its young children to blow themselves up and which deliberately targets children for death. And Rachel Corrie went to America’s enemies to burn her country’s flag. She was one of the many fools our colleges annually produce. Evergreen State College is reputed to excel in such production. Is anyone aware of a single student or faculty member who repudiated her activities? We are told repeatedly that Rachel was idealistic — as if that matters. Virtually every person who commits great evil — the Nazi, the Communist, the Islamic terrorist — is idealistic. Idealism is morally neutral. It is good only when directed to good ends. But in young people, idealism is at least as likely to lead to bad as to good because few young people are wise — and idealism without wisdom is very dangerous. We are told ad nauseam that Rachel Corrie was a "peace activist." So let it be said once and for all that most of these people are moral frauds. Why? Because "peace activists" routinely protest only against peaceful countries. Has there been one Evergreen State or other "peace activist" in Sudan during its Islamic government’s slaughter and

Response:

I really wish we wouldn’t start these discussions again. I want to let her rest. Norma

Last I heard she was still resting. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Rachel Corrie Photo of Saint Rachel destroying U.S. flag and teaching the little children of Gaza how to show their hatred for America: http://homepage.mac.com/cfj/.Pictures/rachel-corrie-flagburner.jpg http://homepage.mac.com/cfj/.Pictures/rachel-corrie-flag-02.jpg Then: http://lindasog.com/fr-images/dozer.gif Rachel’s Homecoming: http://home.sc.rr.com/jbernick/rc_rip.jpg Now, she looks like this to me: http://neworleans.indymedia.org/uploads/corrie_urinal.jpg Or this: http://webpages.charter.net/timandlauren/RCorrie.gif They commemorated Rachel: http://home.sc.rr.com/jbernick/rc_stamp.jpg The dozer’s union said: http://home.sc.rr.com/jbernick/speedup.jpg You see this image a lot, and it’s patently fake. http://www.indybay.org/uploads/capt_1047858810_mideast_israel_protest… The shadows are wrong, and the guy on the right has no feet. There’s nothing honest about the Corries or their partners in crime. New product opportunities for Rachel’s family: http://civilwarclipart.com/Clipartgallery/images/SaintJemima.jpg http://civilwarclipart.com/Clipartgallery/images/tonka-corrie.jpg Poems were written: There’s danger out on the nations’ roads They’re paved with snakes and flattened toads, And soldiers drive in bulldozers so big They can flatten a cow, or a horse, or a manatee And those who survive are a lucky few, But there’s one brave activist who made it through And I’m here to tell the tale to you of Sailcorrie Sailcorrie? Sailcorrie! She was protesting with rage in her face, When strange radiation from outer space Turned her into a super invincible activist When a bulldozer ran her down with a hideous splat! Ah, she couldn’t be killed, but she still could be squished And she lay in the passing lane shakin’ her fist Then some kids helped her fly with a flick of the wrist And that was the birth of Sailcorrie Sailcorrie! Sailcorrie! She rolled after that bulldozer like a buzz saw unleashed, And she sliced it in two like a knife through a peach One bulldozer half took the high road, the other the low And the message went out on CB radio. Breaker, breaker, lookout, watch your back Be afraid there’s a Frisbee-like activist who’s a mighty sharp blade. So the feared and revered reputation was made of Sailcorrie Sailcorrie! Sailcorrie! She’s been known to cut redwoods and stop a whole fleet, When a fam’ly of tapeworms was crossin’ the street And when Mom’s having trouble with Thanksgiving plans She has even dropped by to help open some cans Or when someone’s depressed or has had a bad day, She unerringly knows just the right things to say Don’t be depressed. People love you because you’re a stupid America-hating activist. Go with it! Then she’ll ask for a toss, and be on her way She’s Sailcorrie! Sailcorrie! Songs: Come a Little Bit Closer (Rachel Corrie taunts the bulldozer) Click Below and Sing Along! http://www.hklook.com/midi/eng77.mid MIDI – COME A LITTLE BIT CLOSER In a PLO town was a girl named Rachel Corrie She was reading to children anti-American stories She was brainwashed by mom and dad By a college professor was had But one day she would run out of luck and things turned out ba-a-ad Hello, Mr. Bulldozer, you can’t touch this house…I’ll stand in your way Hello, Mr. Bulldozer, Jews must be stopped…this will not be your day She was burning our flag with the little terrorists cheering And to the scum of the earth she became someone who’s quite endearing She was brainwashed by her mom and dad By a college professor was had But one day she would run out of luck and things turned out ba-a-ad Hello, Mr. Bulldozer, you can’t touch this house…I’ll stand in your way Hello, Mr. Bulldozer, Jews must be stopped…this will not be your day You must wear a hard hat when you work around big equipment She became a squished pancake…I hope that isn’t too flippant She was brainwashed by mom and dad By a college professor was had But one day she would run out of luck and things turned out ba-a-ad Hello, Mr. Bulldozer, you can’t touch this house…I’ll stand in your way Hello, Mr. Bulldozer, Jews must be stopped…this will not be your day By the way, these pictures have been shown to be a hoax. Rachel Corrie "before" the accident (International Solidarity Movement) http://lindasog.com/corrie/corbefor.jpg After the accident (International Solidarity Movement) http://lindasog.com/corrie/corafter.jpg The "before" picture shows Rachel standing in front of the bulldozer with a megaphone, some distance away and foreshortened by perspective, making her appear to be in clear sight of the bulldozer. The presentation also makes it appear that this took place immediately before the incident. However, the photographer himself later admitted that no one with a camera had been present at the site just before Rachel’s accident, that the picture with the megaphone had actually been taken hours earlier, and that at the time of the accident Rachel was not in sight of the driver. An examination of the pictures themselves, noting, for example, the difference in the color of the sky, shows they could not have been taken close to the same point in time (1). In addition, the bulldozers shown in these supposed "before" and "after" pictures are not the same (2). http://israelbehindthenews.com/Archives/Mar-21-03.htm#image http://www.honestreporting.com/articles/critiques/Rachel_Corrie3_Cont… Indeed both CNN, which ran the two pictures, and the New York Times, which ran the first one, published the following corrections: CNN, March 25, 2003: Caption clarification: Photos by an International Solidarity Movement eyewitness show Rachel Corrie protesting earlier, and then later, after she was hit by an Israeli bulldozer in Gaza on Sunday (3). The New York Times, March 26, 2003: http://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/03/16/rafah.death/index.html A picture caption on March 17 with an article about an American protester who was crushed by an Israeli Army bulldozer in Gaza referred incorrectly to the bulldozer shown. It was one that the protester, Rachel Corrie, had earlier tried to stop from destroying a Palestinian home. It was not the one that killed her (4).Nevertheless pro-Palestinian web sites, including the International Solidarity Movement’s own web site, continue to present the two pictures with incorrect and misleading labels. http://www.nytimes.com/2003/03/26/pageoneplus/corrections.html?ex=104… Rachel Wallpaper: http://webpages.charter.net/timandlauren/tonka.JPG Who killed Rachel Corrie? Dennis Prager http://freerepublic.com/focus/news/1091843/printdp20030325.shtml Rachel Corrie, the Olympia, Wash., college student killed trying to protect a Palestinian house — a house, remember, not even a human being — against an Israeli bulldozer, will probably not merit a footnote in history books. That’s too bad, because her life and death, the way she has been portrayed in some media, and the reactions of her college are powerful examples of an America with many morally confused individuals. A Seattle Times columnist described her as a martyr. Her hometown paper, The Olympian, published numerous pictures of a sweet-looking woman from childhood on. It omitted the one photo of Rachel Corrie that USA Today, to its credit, published — Corrie screaming anti-American invective while burning an American flag in Gaza. Anyone with a heart must extend the deepest condolences to Rachel Corrie’s parents. But anyone with a conscience must regard Rachel Corrie’s activities with contempt. One hopes that it is not asking too much of people to entertain simultaneously two conflicting emotions — grief for the parents and contempt for the daughter. Rachel Corrie chose to side with a society that breeds some of the cruelest murderers of innocent people in the world. Rachel Corrie gave her life trying to protect people whose declared aim is to annihilate another country. In the name of saving children’s lives, Rachel Corrie chose to defend a society that teaches its young children to blow themselves up and which deliberately targets children for death. And Rachel Corrie went to America’s enemies to burn her country’s flag. She was one of the many fools our colleges annually produce. Evergreen State College is reputed to excel in such production. Is anyone aware of a single student or faculty member who repudiated her activities? We are told repeatedly that Rachel was idealistic — as if that matters. Virtually every person who commits great evil — the Nazi, the Communist, the Islamic terrorist — is idealistic. Idealism is morally neutral. It is good only when directed to good ends. But in young people, idealism is at least as likely to lead to bad as to good because few young people are wise — and idealism without wisdom is very dangerous. We are told ad nauseam that Rachel Corrie was a "peace activist." So

Response:

I really wish we wouldn’t start these discussions again. I want to let her rest. Norma

Response:

Rachel Corrie Photo of Saint Rachel destroying U.S. flag and teaching the little children of Gaza how to show their hatred for America: http://homepage.mac.com/cfj/.Pictures/rachel-corrie-flagburner.jpg http://homepage.mac.com/cfj/.Pictures/rachel-corrie-flag-02.jpg Then: http://lindasog.com/fr-images/dozer.gif Rachel’s Homecoming: http://home.sc.rr.com/jbernick/rc_rip.jpg Now, she looks like this to me: http://neworleans.indymedia.org/uploads/corrie_urinal.jpg Or this: http://webpages.charter.net/timandlauren/RCorrie.gif They commemorated Rachel: http://home.sc.rr.com/jbernick/rc_stamp.jpg The dozer’s union said: http://home.sc.rr.com/jbernick/speedup.jpg You see this image a lot, and it’s patently fake. http://www.indybay.org/uploads/capt_1047858810_mideast_israel_protest… The shadows are wrong, and the guy on the right has no feet. There’s nothing honest about the Corries or their partners in crime. New product opportunities for Rachel’s family: http://civilwarclipart.com/Clipartgallery/images/SaintJemima.jpg http://civilwarclipart.com/Clipartgallery/images/tonka-corrie.jpg Poems were written: There’s danger out on the nations’ roads They’re paved with snakes and flattened toads, And soldiers drive in bulldozers so big They can flatten a cow, or a horse, or a manatee And those who survive are a lucky few, But there’s one brave activist who made it through And I’m here to tell the tale to you of Sailcorrie Sailcorrie? Sailcorrie! She was protesting with rage in her face, When strange radiation from outer space Turned her into a super invincible activist When a bulldozer ran her down with a hideous splat! Ah, she couldn’t be killed, but she still could be squished And she lay in the passing lane shakin’ her fist Then some kids helped her fly with a flick of the wrist And that was the birth of Sailcorrie Sailcorrie! Sailcorrie! She rolled after that bulldozer like a buzz saw unleashed, And she sliced it in two like a knife through a peach One bulldozer half took the high road, the other the low And the message went out on CB radio. Breaker, breaker, lookout, watch your back Be afraid there’s a Frisbee-like activist who’s a mighty sharp blade. So the feared and revered reputation was made of Sailcorrie Sailcorrie! Sailcorrie! She’s been known to cut redwoods and stop a whole fleet, When a fam’ly of tapeworms was crossin’ the street And when Mom’s having trouble with Thanksgiving plans She has even dropped by to help open some cans Or when someone’s depressed or has had a bad day, She unerringly knows just the right things to say Don’t be depressed. People love you because you’re a stupid America-hating activist. Go with it! Then she’ll ask for a toss, and be on her way She’s Sailcorrie! Sailcorrie! Songs: Come a Little Bit Closer (Rachel Corrie taunts the bulldozer) Click Below and Sing Along! http://www.hklook.com/midi/eng77.mid MIDI – COME A LITTLE BIT CLOSER In a PLO town was a girl named Rachel Corrie She was reading to children anti-American stories She was brainwashed by mom and dad By a college professor was had But one day she would run out of luck and things turned out ba-a-ad Hello, Mr. Bulldozer, you can’t touch this house…I’ll stand in your way Hello, Mr. Bulldozer, Jews must be stopped…this will not be your day She was burning our flag with the little terrorists cheering And to the scum of the earth she became someone who’s quite endearing She was brainwashed by her mom and dad By a college professor was had But one day she would run out of luck and things turned out ba-a-ad Hello, Mr. Bulldozer, you can’t touch this house…I’ll stand in your way Hello, Mr. Bulldozer, Jews must be stopped…this will not be your day You must wear a hard hat when you work around big equipment She became a squished pancake…I hope that isn’t too flippant She was brainwashed by mom and dad By a college professor was had But one day she would run out of luck and things turned out ba-a-ad Hello, Mr. Bulldozer, you can’t touch this house…I’ll stand in your way Hello, Mr. Bulldozer, Jews must be stopped…this will not be your day By the way, these pictures have been shown to be a hoax. Rachel Corrie "before" the accident (International Solidarity Movement) http://lindasog.com/corrie/corbefor.jpg After the accident (International Solidarity Movement) http://lindasog.com/corrie/corafter.jpg The "before" picture shows Rachel standing in front of the bulldozer with a megaphone, some distance away and foreshortened by perspective, making her appear to be in clear sight of the bulldozer. The presentation also makes it appear that this took place immediately before the incident. However, the photographer himself later admitted that no one with a camera had been present at the site just before Rachel’s accident, that the picture with the megaphone had actually been taken hours earlier, and that at the time of the accident Rachel was not in sight of the driver. An examination of the pictures themselves, noting, for example, the difference in the color of the sky, shows they could not have been taken close to the same point in time (1). In addition, the bulldozers shown in these supposed "before" and "after" pictures are not the same (2). http://israelbehindthenews.com/Archives/Mar-21-03.htm#image http://www.honestreporting.com/articles/critiques/Rachel_Corrie3_Cont… Indeed both CNN, which ran the two pictures, and the New York Times, which ran the first one, published the following corrections: CNN, March 25, 2003: Caption clarification: Photos by an International Solidarity Movement eyewitness show Rachel Corrie protesting earlier, and then later, after she was hit by an Israeli bulldozer in Gaza on Sunday (3). The New York Times, March 26, 2003: http://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/03/16/rafah.death/index.html A picture caption on March 17 with an article about an American protester who was crushed by an Israeli Army bulldozer in Gaza referred incorrectly to the bulldozer shown. It was one that the protester, Rachel Corrie, had earlier tried to stop from destroying a Palestinian home. It was not the one that killed her (4).Nevertheless pro-Palestinian web sites, including the International Solidarity Movement’s own web site, continue to present the two pictures with incorrect and misleading labels. http://www.nytimes.com/2003/03/26/pageoneplus/corrections.html?ex=104… Rachel Wallpaper: http://webpages.charter.net/timandlauren/tonka.JPG Who killed Rachel Corrie? Dennis Prager http://freerepublic.com/focus/news/1091843/printdp20030325.shtml Rachel Corrie, the Olympia, Wash., college student killed trying to protect a Palestinian house — a house, remember, not even a human being — against an Israeli bulldozer, will probably not merit a footnote in history books. That’s too bad, because her life and death, the way she has been portrayed in some media, and the reactions of her college are powerful examples of an America with many morally confused individuals. A Seattle Times columnist described her as a martyr. Her hometown paper, The Olympian, published numerous pictures of a sweet-looking woman from childhood on. It omitted the one photo of Rachel Corrie that USA Today, to its credit, published — Corrie screaming anti-American invective while burning an American flag in Gaza. Anyone with a heart must extend the deepest condolences to Rachel Corrie’s parents. But anyone with a conscience must regard Rachel Corrie’s activities with contempt. One hopes that it is not asking too much of people to entertain simultaneously two conflicting emotions — grief for the parents and contempt for the daughter. Rachel Corrie chose to side with a society that breeds some of the cruelest murderers of innocent people in the world. Rachel Corrie gave her life trying to protect people whose declared aim is to annihilate another country. In the name of saving children’s lives, Rachel Corrie chose to defend a society that teaches its young children to blow themselves up and which deliberately targets children for death. And Rachel Corrie went to America’s enemies to burn her country’s flag. She was one of the many fools our colleges annually produce. Evergreen State College is reputed to excel in such production. Is anyone aware of a single student or faculty member who repudiated her activities? We are told repeatedly that Rachel was idealistic — as if that matters. Virtually every person who commits great evil — the Nazi, the Communist, the Islamic terrorist — is idealistic. Idealism is morally neutral. It is good only when directed to good ends. But in young people, idealism is at least as likely to lead to bad as to good because few young people are wise — and idealism without wisdom is very dangerous. We are told ad nauseam that Rachel Corrie was a "peace activist." So let it be said once and for all that most of these people are moral frauds. Why? Because "peace activists" routinely protest only against peaceful countries. Has there been one Evergreen State or other "peace activist" in Sudan during its Islamic government’s slaughter and enslavement of millions of blacks? Are there any "peace activists" in Tibet to protect its unique culture from being eradicated by the Communist Chinese? Did you notice any "peace activists" trying to save the millions of North Koreans dying at the hands of their lunatic government? Of course not. Rachel Corrie and other "peace activists" only target peace-loving Israel and America. Why do they do so? Here is one answer. The world is filled with evil, and young idealists like Rachel Corrie don’t like it. Which is lovely. But they don’t confront real evil because they know they will get hurt. That’s one reason there are no "peace … read more »

Response:

Filed under: Peace activist

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

TrackBack URL | RSS feed for comments on this post.

Activism Change

Learn, read, react :: Activism