Activism Change

OT: SECRET AND STRICTLY PERSONAL – UK EYES ONLY

Question:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – This is interesting…but it *assumes* the UK will participate. What I’m trying to understand is, why? Is is taken for granted that the UK will participate whenever so requested by the US? Is this reciprocal? I would imagine not; in the unlikely situation of the UK going to war, I think the US would evaluate the situation in terms of its own interests. Rupa Umm…Thatch had to rely on General Pinochet and Chile to get any help with the Falklands if I remember. Do you reckon Ronny Ray-Gunn would have lent her some manpower if it had escalated to a British invasion of the Argentine mainland? I doubt, even with the "special relationship". Robin This article from the May 20th Opinion page of the Atlanta Journal Constitution begs to be published here: British memo casts a harsh light   The frame of reference

Filed under: Media activism

Related Posts

• Bush Administration May Have Broke Law Over Medicare Move
• Washington plans protectorate in Iraq alt activism
• Patriots: The Threat Of Antigovernment Extremists
• JPFO is NO JOKE!
• EXPOSED: PLANS TO BUILD FIRST NEW NUKE PLANT IN US IN 30 YEARS
• MAD COW: EXPERT: DISCOVERED SICK COW WAS "NOT THE ONLY MAD COW" IN U.S.
• ** 9/11 Commision: BUSH/CIA. Missed Clues Before Attack
• Global Warming: Expect More "Monster Storms"
• "No Comment" Department
• CONSERVANAZIS