Activism Change

More Dumb Phil Mickelson Comments

Question:

Guess today’s victory by Woods makes Phil’s chances a little more remote…

Yep, Phil is Phucked. Still pretty good year. Better year than a RSG peach year, imho. G

Response:

That old cliche.   zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz If you are falling asleep then quit replying.  As much as I dont want to see this I certainty wont challenge by your stupid ass post into posting what I want.

Sent without editing.  Sorry.  Your zzzzz line is meant to isninuate that you are bored with my comment then dont reply.  It also translates into you trying to bully a someone into posting something that doesnt bore you.   If I am wrong forgive me.  Most likely I am right so fuck off. Cheerio, G – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Give a decent reply or fucking take it to private email. Good god! How much time do you have?  You reply to every freaking thread with dribble. g

Response:

Or better yet, play RSG-Atlanta. Bwwahhhhaaahaa. Tough field at RSG-Atlanta.   Was it that 78 that wont?  Or a 3 putt?  I forget who has game?

Shouldn’t you be out practicing? I want you at your best.

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – That old cliche.   zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz If you are falling asleep then quit replying.  As much as I dont want to see this I certainty wont challenge by your stupid ass post into posting what I want. Sent without editing.  Sorry.  Your zzzzz line is meant to isninuate that you are bored with my comment then dont reply.  It also translates into you trying to bully a someone into posting something that doesnt bore you. If I am wrong forgive me.  Most likely I am right so fuck off.

Oooooo!  Scare tactics.  There wasn’t much insinuation there Greggg, since I came right out and said what I meant by it.  I meant that your comment (re: "If you can’t do better then shut up! nyah nyah!") is a cliche.  Cliche: a trite phrase or expression; a hackneyed theme, characterization, or situation; something (as a menu item) that has become overly familiar or commonplace.  And in this case, a weak reply when you couldn’t think of any better way to argue the issue. Oh yeah, bite me.

Response:

That old cliche.   zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz If you are falling asleep then quit replying.  As much as I dont want to see this I certainty wont challenge by your stupid ass post into posting what I want.

It may not have been the most polite response, but I believe that the intent is valid. Why is it that some people who don’t like their idols being criticized respond with things like "Well, let’s see you out there doing it!". Does that mean we are not allowed to criticize any professional players’ performance, just because we cannot do any better?  Hell, I would think that just the fact that we pay their salary, we’re allowed to do so !

Response:

Ah, but as Annika said – the year ain’t over.  Let’s see what happens in October.  Castle Hills and Tour 18 await. —

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Guess today’s victory by Woods makes Phil’s chances a little more remote… Yep, Phil is Phucked. Still pretty good year. Better year than a RSG peach year, imho. G

Response:

Criticize all you want Annika1980, but I dont see you out there playing, so go make some more fart pictures.   You have some credible talent there! Annika1980 was saying that Phil’s comments were stupid.  He did not say that Phil was a bad golfer.  I know of one coveted championship that Annika1980 has won that Phil hasn’t… RSG Atlanta!

Phil needs to learn that if you’re gonna talk the talk, you gotta walk the walk. My mouth don’t write checks my body can’t cash baby!

Response:

It should mean more than that.   If Phil had won a major, and had other stats comparable to Tiger’s, then coming close would count.   But he didn’t. Sort of like college football polls – if only one major team is undefeated, it doesn’t matter how big the victories are.

Phil should do like Florida State. He should play the Buy.Com tour and rack up about 10 wins and claim himself the best player in the world.

Response:

Phil should do like Florida State. He should play the Buy.Com tour and rack up about 10 wins and claim himself the best player in the world.

Or better yet, play RSG-Atlanta. Joseph

Response:

That old cliche.   zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

If you are falling asleep then quit replying.  As much as I dont want to see this I certainty wont challenge by your stupid ass post into posting what I want. Give a decent reply or fucking take it to private email. Good god! How much time do you have?  You reply to every freaking thread with dribble. g

Response:

Phil should do like Florida State. He should play the Buy.Com tour and rack up about 10 wins and claim himself the best player in the world. Or better yet, play RSG-Atlanta.

Bwwahhhhaaahaa. Tough field at RSG-Atlanta.   Was it that 78 that wont?  Or a 3 putt?  I forget who has game? G

Response:

Criticize all you want Annika1980, but I dont see you out there playing, so go make some more fart pictures.   You have some credible talent there!

I’ve got my Jacket.  Where’s Phil’s? Career Majors: Annika1980 – 1 Wussy Boy – 0 And the year ain’t over yet for me babe!

Response:

Criticize all you want Annika1980, but I dont see you out there

playing…. That old cliche.   zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Now Shill Mickelson is lobbying for "Player of the Year." He says that one player (Tiger) has won more tournaments this year, but he doesn’t know who has played better than he has. Tiger has won more tournaments, more money, and has a lower scoring average than Phil.  You have to go to less significant statistics before Phil comes out on top, such as "Scoring Average Before Cut" (in which Phil has Tiger beat.) I agree.  The only thing I’ve seen that could lend any credibility to his claim is that his % in the top 3 is 45.5% while Tiger is 33.3%.  By the time you get to top 10 finishes, the gap is 55% vs 53%.  In all other categories, Tiger has the better numbers. (e.g. top 25 is 93% for Tiver vs 55% for Phil and Tiger did not miss a cut, Phil missed three).

When it comes to "Player of the Year", near misses shouldn’t mean jack shit – PGA Tour golf is about winning (and winning $, and winning important events). Playing pretty well, but losing, shouldn’t enter into the equation. — Joe Cartpath – www.joecartpath.com Basic Golf Clubmaking & Memphis Area Golf Course Guide and….The Memphis MG Page…

Response:

I agree.  The only thing I’ve seen that could lend any credibility to his claim is that his % in the top 3 is 45.5% while Tiger is 33.3%.  By the time you get to top 10 finishes, the gap is 55% vs 53%.  In all other categories, Tiger has the better numbers. (e.g. top 25 is 93% for Tiver vs 55% for Phil and Tiger did not miss a cut, Phil missed three).’

Phi’s Top 3 percentage is that high? 45.5? And he only as two wins? I wonder why that is?

Response:

When it comes to "Player of the Year", near misses shouldn’t mean jack shit – PGA Tour golf is about winning (and winning $, and winning important events). Playing pretty well, but losing, shouldn’t enter into the equation.

It should mean more than that.   If Phil had won a major, and had other stats comparable to Tiger’s, then coming close would count.   But he didn’t. Sort of like college football polls – if only one major team is undefeated, it doesn’t matter how big the victories are.

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I agree.  The only thing I’ve seen that could lend any credibility to his claim is that his % in the top 3 is 45.5% while Tiger is 33.3%.  By the time you get to top 10 finishes, the gap is 55% vs 53%.  In all other categories, Tiger has the better numbers. (e.g. top 25 is 93% for Tiver vs 55% for Phil and Tiger did not miss a cut, Phil missed three). When it comes to "Player of the Year", near misses shouldn’t mean jack shit – PGA Tour golf is about winning (and winning $, and winning important events). Playing pretty well, but losing, shouldn’t enter into the

equation. Phil said he doesn’t know who has played better than he has.  I was trying to see what justification he could have for that statement.  Being in the top 3 45.5% of the time was the only thing to which I believed he could have been referring.  Prior to this thread, I did not know there was such a thing as "Player of the Year".  I have no idea what factors are used to decide it. I agree that Tiger has had the better year.

Response:

Guess today’s victory by Woods makes Phil’s chances a little more remote… —

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Now Shill Mickelson is lobbying for "Player of the Year." He says that one player (Tiger) has won more tournaments this year, but he doesn’t know who has played better than he has. Gee Phil, here’s a clue: You won the Buick Invitational and the Greater Hartford Open. Tiger won Bay Hill, The Players Championship, The Memorial, and some little tournament they have down in Georgia every April. Yeah, Phil …. you rule!

Response:

Now Shill Mickelson is lobbying for "Player of the Year." He says that one player (Tiger) has won more tournaments this year, but he doesn’t know who has played better than he has. Gee Phil, here’s a clue: You won the Buick Invitational and the Greater Hartford Open. Tiger won Bay Hill, The Players Championship, The Memorial, and some little tournament they have down in Georgia every April. Yeah, Phil …. you rule!

Response:

Now Shill Mickelson is lobbying for "Player of the Year." He says that one player (Tiger) has won more tournaments this year, but he doesn’t know who has played better than he has.

Tiger has won more tournaments, more money, and has a lower scoring average than Phil.  You have to go to less significant statistics before Phil comes out on top, such as "Scoring Average Before Cut" (in which Phil has Tiger beat.)

Response:

Gee Phil, here’s a clue: You won the Buick Invitational and the Greater Hartford Open. Tiger won Bay Hill, The Players Championship, The Memorial, and some little tournament they have down in Georgia every April.

So far this year, here is the comparison between Tiger and Phil. Average money per tournament… Tiger: $299,049 Phil: $193,881 Win Percentage… Tiger: 26.67% Phil: 9.09% Tiger has a major, Phil doesn’t…  And why is Phil talking about player of the year now?  The season is not over yet. Dan L.

Response:

Now Shill Mickelson is lobbying for "Player of the Year." He says that one player (Tiger) has won more tournaments this year, but he doesn’t know who has played better than he has. Gee Phil, here’s a clue:

If he wins tomorrow he may have a legitimate challenge, of course he needs to steal someone’s green jacket and that  Wanamaker trophy.  Regardless, he’s had a shot. He missed it.  Golf isn’t fair and life sucks, I would hate to be him. I like Phil "Wanamaker" "shill" Mickelson. But I admit I dont know him.  I just have seen him hit some brave shots and some dumb ones. I have to say he may not produce major wins but it isn’t for lack of guts. Criticize all you want Annika1980, but I dont see you out there playing, so go make some more fart pictures.   You have some credible talent there! Cheerio, G

Response:

Criticize all you want Annika1980, but I dont see you out there playing, so go make some more fart pictures.   You have some credible talent there!

Annika1980 was saying that Phil’s comments were stupid.  He did not say that Phil was a bad golfer.  I know of one coveted championship that Annika1980 has won that Phil hasn’t… RSG Atlanta! Btw, here is an article with some of Phil’s comments. http://www.ohio.com/bj/sports/docs/006894.htm Dan L.

Response:

I have come to the conclusion that Phil does lack intelligence after another snafu today.  Its no wonder he hasn’t won a major, (maybe he can hire Woosie’s fired caddie.) He needs to do less practicing and more studying golf strategy and now the rules. He has the game, but I dont think he has the brains anymore.

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Now Shill Mickelson is lobbying for "Player of the Year." He says that one player (Tiger) has won more tournaments this year, but he doesn’t know who has played better than he has. Tiger has won more tournaments, more money, and has a lower scoring average than Phil.  You have to go to less significant statistics before Phil comes out on top, such as "Scoring Average Before Cut" (in which Phil has Tiger beat.)

I agree.  The only thing I’ve seen that could lend any credibility to his claim is that his % in the top 3 is 45.5% while Tiger is 33.3%.  By the time you get to top 10 finishes, the gap is 55% vs 53%.  In all other categories, Tiger has the better numbers. (e.g. top 25 is 93% for Tiver vs 55% for Phil and Tiger did not miss a cut, Phil missed three).

Response:

Filed under: Lobbying

Related Posts

• Why is flying expensive?
• Why the healthcare industry hates "big" government
• MS Society Response
• Belize in early May?
• US seeks war crimes exemption extension
• Aluminum based vaccines
• ! Help for Diabetes
• Gas cooled reactors in the US (was Re: Just a couple observations)
• FRLegacy of the 105th Congress: Many Setbacks for WomenOM (NOW0
• Coast Guard Boating Tax, NOT!