Should Christians vote?… YES !!!!!!!!!!!
Question:
The next Presidential Debate is Wednesday, YOUR VOICE CAN BE HEARD… BOB SCHIEFFER IS LISTENING… God has given us the privilege to vote.
We have the responsibility to vote because the collective will of the people to defend our Constitution and our liberties. President Bush can win California if those Christians who want CONSERVATIVE JUDGES and Politicians that will respect our beliefs in office.
Antonin Scalia has been quoted supporting orgies. He’s G Bush’s favorite judge. PLEASE ENCOURAGE EVERYONE, especially every Evangelical Christians, EVERYONE YOU KNOW, TO GET OUT AND VOTE NOVEMBER 2ND !!!
You should especially encourage those Evangelical Christians who can not bother to go to church, like G bush, to vote. JohnN
Response:
The next Presidential Debate is Wednesday, YOUR VOICE CAN BE HEARD… BOB SCHIEFFER IS LISTENING… God has given us the privilege to vote. President Bush can win California if those Christians who want CONSERVATIVE JUDGES and Politicians that will respect our beliefs in office. PLEASE ENCOURAGE EVERYONE, especially every Evangelical Christians, EVERYONE YOU KNOW, TO GET OUT AND VOTE NOVEMBER 2ND !!! I heard you say you are receiving quite a few emails with suggestions of questions to ask, and that you are "framing" your questions based on some of what people are asking you. Here’s my thoughts on what many Americans might like to know about our candidates…. Perhaps this first one might be one that you consider for yourself, or might ask: 1. What is truth?… How do you define truth? How do the candidates define truth? Can you really get at truth? (73,00 websites below ask the same question). 2. How would the candidates define "WHO THEY ARE, instead of what they’ve done?" 3. We obviously know exactly President Bush’s positions, hopefully you might have Senator Kerry BETTER DEFINE some of his positions (like abortions, marriage, and does his faith play a role in his decisions ? 4. Is marriage between a man and a woman a worthwhile goal for society? WHY OR WHY NOT? If so, what should the Federal Government do to insure it is or remains a worthwhile goal? How can we stop Judicial activism? How do you explain previous votes or positions on these issues? HOW WOULD EACH DEFINE WHEN "A LIFE BEGINS" IN ORDER THAT GOVERNMENT THEN HAS A RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT IT? 5. Is it more important for Government to provide incentives for ownership of homes, businesses, investments, retirement plans, OR, is it more important for government to provide stop gaps for those who can’t provide for themselves? (OR IS IT OF EXACTLY EQUAL IMPORTANCE?) 6. What/who was responsible for the recession at the end of the Clinton Administration, and what/who is responsible for our recovery from that recession that President Bush inherited? 7. Should any consideration be given to the fact there have been no further terrorists attacks since 9/11 at home? Does President Bush get any credit for that? If not, then why should it even be an issue to discuss for this election. 8. Is there any point that government should not fund science that destroys life for research? In order words, do you have any point that you would define where life begins? 9. President Clinton lied under oath over a "sexual" matter. Was this a "serious crime", or a minor mistake to be overlooked? 10. Assuming there is standard for a way to determine "truth", should filmmakers like Michael Moore be subject to government penalties for distorting the truth about America, worldwide, during a time of war? Alan Gluck FYI, email addresses for news organizations www.pete-online.us/Images2/MediaEmailAddresses2004b.htm www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1228326/posts
Response:
Filed under: Judicial Activism
Leave a Comment
XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
TrackBack URL | RSS feed for comments on this post.