Activism Change

Eric thinks many more of our men in uniform should have been killed in the Gulf War

Question:

snip – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Of course the point is that if one cannot attack other countries without loss of ones own troops, one only stages such attacks for a good reason, rather than staging them frivilously, as we do now, with a complete absense of the public giving a shit as long as no American comes home in a body bag. Given that US sanctions and military attacks have already killed over a million Iraqis of all ages, the question becomes one of proportion. The American public wouldn’t tolerate such a military adventure if even one American were killed for each 100 dead Iraqis, but having exclusively dead Iraqis doesn’t seem to shock the conscience of the American public at all.  I am reminded of the Zionist who once made the statement that all the Arabs in the Middle East weren’t worth one Jewish fingernail. and that all sounds real good but you did want to see our men be killed and that is all that matters. I want all countries to have working air defense systems.  If countries then attack each other, and casualities result, that is the problem of the leader who ordered the attack, and not my responsibility. I don’t consider dead humans who happen to be US citizens to be a bigger loss to the biosphere than dead humans of other persuasions.

I may troll some Eric but when I do I have never made remarks like yours.  Your remarks were way over the top.  It is one thing to disagree with a Policy decision but quite another to want to see our men and women get killed. YOUR quote Eric: http://www.inet-one.com/cypherpunks/dir.1998.02.16-1998.02.22/msg0008…   What the world needs now is not another mass killing of Iraqis by the   United States government.  What the world really needs now is a fifty   dollar weapon that sinks aircraft carriers.   Most of them would probably follow "legal orders" to fire upon American   civilians too.   The only thing Americans understand is dead Americans.  The only thing.   I’ve always believed that communications functions most effectively when   people are talked to in a language that they understand. snip of more Eric trolling Take a break for now though.  Tell yourself none of this ever happened. Go on back to what you do best which is rant and race that all parents are abusive. Only child abusers and child abuser apologists tell the lie that criticism of abusive parents is criticism of all parents.

If anyone tells a child what to do in your eyes that is abuse.  If I restrict Internet access at home you see that as abuse.  If I blocked sexually explicit channels on my cable you see that as abusive.  If I refused to allow my teen to date a grown-up you would call that abusive. Which one are you?  Have you abused yet, or is that a shining moment you look forward to in your future?  When it happens, will it involve the little boys you like to accuse others of having sex with?

You really need to stop trolling as you are not very good at it. snip of more Eric Trolling You will learn many new dances before I turn you loose.

I am sure your dance card will fill up fast Eric. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – — Eric Michael Cordian 0+ O:.T:.O:. Mathematical Munitions Division "Do What Thou Wilt Shall Be The Whole Of The Law"

Response:

(massive snipage occurs) troll on troll fratricide in progress. redc1c4, — "Enlisted men are stupid, but extremely cunning and sly, and bear considerable watching."  Army Officer’s Guide

Response:

Filed under: Internet activism

Related Posts

• Sen. Glenn Admits to Violating Constitution - Attn Ohioans
• More on Baby Moses and Roe v Wade
• School Board Rejects Proposal To Teach Christian Creationism
• Carol witkowski has 24 hours to prove that I have threaten to steal her credit report
• Angles re: Act-Up SF
• law-n-order and freedom (was Re: Guns and Skeptics)
• 'MONSANTO HAS DECLARED WAR ON ANOTHER LITTLE GUY'
• THE INTERNET IS FOR DORKS!!
• FASCISM: Who believes in coincidences?
• Human Rights & Smoking