Activism Change

Clinton admits he blew it by not taking UBL from Sudan and caused 9/11

Question:

Irrefutable proof, straight from Clinton’s lips that he turned down UBL. Just think, if he would have been forward thinking enough (libs never are, they always wit till AFTER something happens) and took UBL when Sudan offfdered him, there would have been no 9/11. Read it and weep, libs, you caused 9/11 and ruined our chance for peace ed in our time and moved up the end of the world by some 20 years. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1107404/posts?page=36 CLINTON TURNED DOWN SUDAN’S OFFERS OF BIN LADEN HEAR CLINTON’S SECRETLY TAPED "ADMISSION" NOW by Mia T, 3.28.04 "The Sudanese wanted America to start dealing with them again. They released him [bin Laden]. At the time, ‘96, he had committed no crime against America, so I did not bring him here because we had no basis on which to hold him, though we knew he wanted to commit crimes against America. So I pleaded with the Saudis to take him, ’cause they could have; but they thought it was a hot potato. They didn’t and that’s how he wound up in Afghanistan." bill clinton Sunday, Aug. 11, 2002 Clinton Reveals on Secret Audio: I Nixed Bin Laden Extradition Offer "The instant that second plane hit, I said to the person with whom I was speaking, ‘Bin Laden did this.’ I knew immediately. I know what this network can do." bill clinton To hear Clinton now say "We must do more to reduce the pool of potential terrorists" is thus beyond farce. He had numerous opportunities to reduce that pool, and he blew it. A Fish Rots from the Head Investor’s Business Daily Clinton’s failure to grasp the opportunity to unravel increasingly organized extremists, coupled with Berger’s assessments of their potential to directly threaten the U.S., represents one of the most serious foreign policy failures in American history. Clinton Let Bin Laden Slip Away and Metastasize MANSOOR IJAZ December 5, 2001 isten carefully to clinton’s "admission." Watch the flash movie. Diagram the sentences. It’s the classic clinton snake-oil sales pitch that exploits liberal credulousness and the gestalt concepts of structural economy and closure (the tendency to perceive incomplete forms as complete). This allows clinton to tell the story of his utter failure to fight terrorism, his failure to take bin Laden from Sudan, his repeated failures, in fact, to decapitate an incipient and still stoppable al Qaeda, without explicitly admitting it. "The Sudanese wanted America to start dealing with them again; [so] they released him [to America]." Note that the linkage between the above two sentences and the indirect object of the second sentence are each implied, giving clinton plausible deniability. "[H]e had committed no crime against America, so I did not bring him here because we had no basis on which to hold him, though we knew he wanted to commit crimes against America." This position is surprising on two counts: clinton has never been one to allow the rule of law get in his way. Although bin Laden had repeatedly declared war on America during clinton’s tenure, clinton treats terrorism not as a war but as a law enforcement problem, which, by definition is defensive, after-the-fact and fatally-too-late. The impeached ex-president fails to understand that when terrorists declare war on you

Filed under: Human Rights

Related Posts

• Election
• son of a bitch
• POLL: What Force Can Free Mumia Abu-Jamal?
• Happy Independence Day!
• Discovered a way to stare at women.
• Two prisoners dying in Israeli jail
• Israel responsible for any attack on Aqsa Mosque
• Anti Scientology SLOGANS : Post here
• How innocent Iraqis came to be abused as terrorists
• Vote for Ralph Nader.