Your Political Alignment

Question:

You are a Social Liberal (68% permissive) and an… Economic Conservative (71% permissive) You are best described as a: Libertarian You exhibit a very well-developed sense of Right and Wrong and believe in economic fairness. loc: (68, 81) modscore: (43, 41)

Response:

My results: Social liberal 68% Economic liberal 15% I’m a socialist. *raises left fist* Proletarians of ASS, unite!

Response:

Lash Rambo wrote: > A quiz to determine your political alignment (republican, democrat, > libertarian, socialist, fascist, anarchist, etc.): > http://www.okcupid.com/politics > I lost my specific results, but remember it said I was a centrist. Will > take again later to get the actual figures.

"You are a Social Liberal (70% permissive) and an… Economic Liberal (33% permissive) You are best described as a: Democrat You exhibit a very well-developed sense of Right and Wrong and believe in economic fairness." Am not ! I’m really evil and bad-ass !

Response:

"Lash Rambo" <l…@fakeaddr.com> wrote in message

news:Xns96E0A4C562975lrfakeaddrcom@68.1.17.6… >A quiz to determine your political alignment (republican, democrat, > libertarian, socialist, fascist, anarchist, etc.): > http://www.okcupid.com/politics

Apparently I’m quad-word aligned!

Response:

Lash Rambo <l…@fakeaddr.com> wrote in news:Xns96E1148EEA8F4lrfakeaddrcom@68.1.17.6: >>> 24. It should be legal for two consenting adults to challenge each >>> other to a duel and fight a Death Match. >> Of course it should! > Seriously? Why?

Because it would be awesome. And a way to find out if some of those weird martial arts strikes really work. But it would need to be tightly regulated. The challenge would have to be very formal and unmistakable, and the match itself regulated, because you certainly don’t want murders where you can say the guy agreed to a death match when he didn’t. >>> 27. The fact that many people starve to death is unfortunate but >>> unavoidable. >> I would think that it’s avoidable. It’s avoidable in the first >> world, anyway. > In theory, it’s avoidable any place people can grow food. In > practice, it’s unavoidable due to human greed. So, I said "agree." > Again, maybe the author intended it to read: "All people who starve to > death deserve it." In that case, I’d have answered differently.

Maybe I’m just naively optimistic there, but I think it very well may be avoidable in a realistic way. Probably not in the near future, and probably overpopulation will throw a wrench in any good intentions though. And it certainly wouldn’t happen through consistent free food handouts from one country to another, that’s just silly and creates more problems than it solves in the long run.

Response:

Hmmmpf. Apparently I’m a "Democrat." What a hokey test. It completely failed to detect my feminist anarcho-syndicalist leanings.

Response:

William P <willd…@sympatico.ca> wrote in news:Xns96E1FCF82CCwilldotpsympaticodot@207.35.177.135: – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> "Jim Winters" <extremereactionfo…@yahoo.com> wrote in > news:1128048725.338342.144300@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com: >> Lash Rambo wrote: >>> A quiz to determine your political alignment (republican, democrat, >>> libertarian, socialist, fascist, anarchist, etc.): >>> http://www.okcupid.com/politics >>> I lost my specific results, but remember it said I was a centrist. > Will >>> take again later to get the actual figures. >>>From the test: >> 5. Something like the theory of Natural Selection explains why some >> people are homeless. > I said disagree on that one because I don’t agree with what the author > probably implied, that in some sense homeless people are gentically > "weak".

Hmm…. I hadn’t thought to read it like: "All homeless people deserve to be homeless." Instead, I agreed with the statement at face value, because natural selection easily bends to explain all social and biological inequities. >> 24. It should be legal for two consenting adults to challenge each >> other to a duel and fight a Death Match. > Of course it should!

Seriously? Why? >> 27. The fact that many people starve to death is unfortunate but >> unavoidable. > I would think that it’s avoidable. It’s avoidable in the first world, > anyway.

In theory, it’s avoidable any place people can grow food. In practice, it’s unavoidable due to human greed. So, I said "agree." Again, maybe the author intended it to read: "All people who starve to death deserve it." In that case, I’d have answered differently. Maybe I should retake the quiz reading more into the statements. >> 39. The life of one American is worth the lives of several foreigners. > I’m not American, so that’s a no brain answer. Obviously I’m worth at > least 82 Americans.

You better watch out. Some of us know where to find the country you live in!

Response:

Lash Rambo wrote: > LisatheSequel <dontmai…@goaway.com> wrote in news:dhhm5s$hk7$1 > @swifty.westend.com: >>You are a Social Conservative (35% permissive) and an Economic Liberal >>(21% permissive. >>You are best described as a: Totalitarian > Would you agree with that? I wouldn’t have ever associated totalitarianism > with you.

I wouldn’t have thought so, but there it is. I answered the questions honestly. Apparently the only way to do things the way I’d do them is under a totalitarian government.

Response:

Lash Rambo wrote… > http://www.okcupid.com/politics

Social Liberal (76% permissive) Economic Liberal (33% permissive) You are best described as a Democrat.

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -meg wrote: > Lash Rambo wrote: >>A quiz to determine your political alignment (republican, democrat, >>libertarian, socialist, fascist, anarchist, etc.): >>http://www.okcupid.com/politics >>I lost my specific results, but remember it said I was a centrist. Will >>take again later to get the actual figures. > You are a > Social Moderate > (50% permissive) > and an… > Economic Liberal > (20% permissive) > You are best described as a: > Democrat > You exhibit a very well-developed sense of Right and Wrong and believe > in economic fairness. > Weird, I used to always come up Libertarian on these things.. > MORE IMPORTANTLY, I want to know where everyone stands on the Death > Match issue.

I said "no". From that point on, that’s all anyone would get done. I see the country in deadlock. Do you know how many people I’ve wanted to kill in my lifetime??? Put it this way, the highways would be virtually deserted if I were any good at it.

Response:

Lash Rambo <l…@fakeaddr.com> wrote in news:Xns96E0A4C562975lrfakeaddrcom@ 68.1.17.6: > A quiz to determine your political alignment (republican, democrat, > libertarian, socialist, fascist, anarchist, etc.): > http://www.okcupid.com/politics > I lost my specific results, but remember it said I was a centrist. Will > take again later to get the actual figures.

You are a Social Liberal (63% permissive) and an… Economic Moderate (56% permissive) You are best described as a: Centrist

Response:

LisatheSequel <dontmai…@goaway.com> wrote in news:dhhm5s$hk7$1 @swifty.westend.com: > You are a Social Conservative (35% permissive) and an Economic Liberal > (21% permissive. > You are best described as a: Totalitarian

Would you agree with that? I wouldn’t have ever associated totalitarianism with you.

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -Lash Rambo wrote: > "meg" <notstalka…@gmail.com> wrote in news:1128036489.926359.125530 > @g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com: > > Lash Rambo wrote: > >> A quiz to determine your political alignment (republican, democrat, > >> libertarian, socialist, fascist, anarchist, etc.): > >> http://www.okcupid.com/politics > >> I lost my specific results, but remember it said I was a centrist. Will > >> take again later to get the actual figures. > > You are a > > Social Moderate > > (50% permissive) > > and an… > > Economic Liberal > > (20% permissive) > > You are best described as a: > > Democrat > > You exhibit a very well-developed sense of Right and Wrong and believe > > in economic fairness. > > Weird, I used to always come up Libertarian on these things.. > > MORE IMPORTANTLY, I want to know where everyone stands on the Death > > Match issue. > I said "no," because I want there to be something on T.V. besides couples > killing each other. :D

It would eliminate parenting time issues for the divorced. It would be a public service!

Response:

5. Something like the theory of Natural Selection explains why some people are homeless. 24. It should be legal for two consenting adults to challenge each other to a duel and fight a Death Match. 27. The fact that many people starve to death is unfortunate but unavoidable. 39. The life of one American is worth the lives of several foreigners. THESE ARE NOT, NOR HAVE THEY EVER BEEN, REAL LIBERTARIAN TALKING POINTS.

Response:

"Jim Winters" <extremereactionfo…@yahoo.com> wrote in news:1128048725.338342.144300@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com: > Lash Rambo wrote: >> A quiz to determine your political alignment (republican, democrat, >> libertarian, socialist, fascist, anarchist, etc.): >> http://www.okcupid.com/politics >> I lost my specific results, but remember it said I was a centrist. Will >> take again later to get the actual figures. >>From the test: > 5. Something like the theory of Natural Selection explains why some > people are homeless.

Economic conservatism. > 24. It should be legal for two consenting adults to challenge each > other to a duel and fight a Death Match.

Social liberalism. > 27. The fact that many people starve to death is unfortunate but > unavoidable.

Economic conservatism. > 39. The life of one American is worth the lives of several foreigners.

Social conservatism. > THESE ARE NOT, NOR HAVE THEY EVER BEEN, REAL LIBERTARIAN TALKING POINTS.

Are you saying it called you a liberal and you disagree?

Response:

I said disagree on that one because I don’t agree with what the author probably implied, that in some sense homeless people are gentically "weak". It’s maybe quite the opposite, that if someone can, without so much challenge, sit around, get resources from other people, and produce tons of kids that other people care for, that is genetically _fit_, baby. That’s a total Darwinian coup and like hitting the jackpot. I also to some extent think that Natural Selection explains everything. Including various human traits and the nature and range of genetic diversity in them. This is knowledge that most people don’t want to have. And I’m quite willing to consider that it may be the best thing _not_ to seek that kind of knowledge. > 24. It should be legal for two consenting adults to challenge each > other to a duel and fight a Death Match.

Of course it should! > 27. The fact that many people starve to death is unfortunate but > unavoidable.

I would think that it’s avoidable. It’s avoidable in the first world, anyway. > 39. The life of one American is worth the lives of several foreigners.

I’m not American, so that’s a no brain answer. Obviously I’m worth at least 82 Americans. > THESE ARE NOT, NOR HAVE THEY EVER BEEN, REAL LIBERTARIAN TALKING

POINTS.

Response:

I was in the middle of the bottom right square, near the socialist line. Strong Democrat, in the middle of the blue wave. And hell yes on the Death Match.

Response:

"meg" <notstalka…@gmail.com> wrote in news:1128036489.926359.125530 @g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com: – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Lash Rambo wrote: >> A quiz to determine your political alignment (republican, democrat, >> libertarian, socialist, fascist, anarchist, etc.): >> http://www.okcupid.com/politics >> I lost my specific results, but remember it said I was a centrist. Will >> take again later to get the actual figures. > You are a > Social Moderate > (50% permissive) > and an… > Economic Liberal > (20% permissive) > You are best described as a: > Democrat > You exhibit a very well-developed sense of Right and Wrong and believe > in economic fairness. > Weird, I used to always come up Libertarian on these things.. > MORE IMPORTANTLY, I want to know where everyone stands on the Death > Match issue.

I said "no," because I want there to be something on T.V. besides couples killing each other. :D

Response:

William P wrote: > "meg" <notstalka…@gmail.com> wrote in news:1128036489.926359.125530 > @g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com: > > Weird, I used to always come up Libertarian on these things.. > > MORE IMPORTANTLY, I want to know where everyone stands on the Death > > Match issue. > Where do you stand on it, tough girl?

Around your height and twice as feisty. Bring it on.

Response:

You are a Social Moderate (50% permissive) and an… Economic Liberal (20% permissive) You are best described as a: Democrat You exhibit a very well-developed sense of Right and Wrong and believe in economic fairness. Weird, I used to always come up Libertarian on these things.. MORE IMPORTANTLY, I want to know where everyone stands on the Death Match issue.

Response:

"meg" <notstalka…@gmail.com> wrote in news:1128036489.926359.125530 @g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com: > Weird, I used to always come up Libertarian on these things.. > MORE IMPORTANTLY, I want to know where everyone stands on the Death > Match issue.

Where do you stand on it, tough girl?

Response:

A quiz to determine your political alignment (republican, democrat, libertarian, socialist, fascist, anarchist, etc.): http://www.okcupid.com/politics I lost my specific results, but remember it said I was a centrist. Will take again later to get the actual figures.

Response:

You are a Social Conservative (35% permissive) and an Economic Liberal (21% permissive. You are best described as a: Totalitarian You exhibit a very well-developed sense of Right and Wrong and believe in economic fairness.

Response:

You are a Social Liberal (73% permissive) and an… Economic Liberal (6% permissive) You are best described as a: Socialist You exhibit a very well-developed sense of Right and Wrong and believe in economic fairness. It’s left-wing extremists like me that are paralyzing the Democratic party and fucking the country over.

Response:

Lash Rambo <l…@fakeaddr.com> wrote in news:Xns96E0A4C562975lrfakeaddrcom@68.1.17.6: > A quiz to determine your political alignment (republican, democrat, > libertarian, socialist, fascist, anarchist, etc.): > http://www.okcupid.com/politics > I lost my specific results, but remember it said I was a centrist. Will > take again later to get the actual figures.

You are a Social Liberal (71% permissive) and an… Economic Conservative (60% permissive) You are best described as a: Libertarian You exhibit a very well-developed sense of Right and Wrong and believe in economic fairness. — I loved "Do you believe consenting adults should be able to challenge each other and fight in a death match?" I said "agree" on that one.

Response:

Filed under: Feminist

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

TrackBack URL | RSS feed for comments on this post.

Activism Change

Learn, read, react :: Activism