Filed under: Feminist
Question:
>You don’t need to stand on the street corner looking for men to >manipulate… they will follow you and do whatever you say.
really? dishes, dinner when i get home from class, & vacuum? no shit? h
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -LisatheSequel wrote: > aabne wrote: > > > I love this newsgroup. I learn so much about myself here. > > > For instance, did you know I want to have sex, ’cause I’m a > > > jizz-drippin’ slutbag, but I don’t want to take responsibility > > > for it? > > No… women only let men penetrate them after an exaustive > > screening process. They deny entry to men in order to control > > them. Most women do have more spontenious sex but only with highly > > attractive jock types. > Okay. You got me. > My children were conceived in marathon love-fests with > him: http://makeashorterlink.com/?X50821ABB > him: http://makeashorterlink.com/?N41825ABB > and him: http://makeashorterlink.com/?D12852ABB > My shame is complete. 
> > You don’t need to stand on the street corner looking for men to > > manipulate… they will follow you and do whatever you say. > Great news. First thing I’m going to do is order Brad Pitt to stop > skanking himself up to look like something that got caught in a drain.
drain crud is cool! :p
Response:
>Most women do have more spontenious sex but only >with highly attractive
jock types. Exactly.
Response:
>Okay. You got me.
My children were conceived in marathon love-fests with him: http://makeashorterlink.com/?X50821ABB him: http://makeashorterlink.com/?N41825ABB >and him: http://makeashorterlink.com/?D12852ABB
The guys in these pics are considered the current beauty ideal for men. I see beautiful women all over any guy who looks like that.
Response:
aabne wrote: >> I love this newsgroup. I learn so much about myself here. >> For instance, did you know I want to have sex, ’cause I’m a >> jizz-drippin’ slutbag, but I don’t want to take responsibility for it? > No… women only let men penetrate them after an exaustive screening > process. They deny entry to men in order to control them. Most women do > have more spontenious sex but only with highly attractive jock types.
Okay. You got me. My children were conceived in marathon love-fests with him: http://makeashorterlink.com/?X50821ABB him: http://makeashorterlink.com/?N41825ABB and him: http://makeashorterlink.com/?D12852ABB My shame is complete. > You don’t need to stand on the street corner looking for men to > manipulate… they will follow you and do whatever you say.
Great news. First thing I’m going to do is order Brad Pitt to stop skanking himself up to look like something that got caught in a drain.
Response:
"LisatheSequel" <dontmai…@goaway.com> wrote in message
news:dfbkpu$4ge$1@swifty.westend.com… > aabne wrote: >> No… women only let men penetrate them after an exaustive screening >> process. They deny entry to men in order to control them. Most women do >> have more spontenious sex but only with highly attractive jock types. > Okay. You got me. > My children were conceived in marathon love-fests with > him: http://makeashorterlink.com/?X50821ABB > him: http://makeashorterlink.com/?N41825ABB > and him: http://makeashorterlink.com/?D12852ABB > My shame is complete.
they look bionic. i .. be drawn more to the skinny type. joz — For more information about this NNTP posting service, contact: h…@asarian-host.net — for all info about our server. If you want an anonymous account, visit our sign-up page: https://asarian-host.net/cgi-bin/signup.cgi
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -bad joss wrote: > "LisatheSequel" <dontmai…@goaway.com> wrote in message > news:dfbkpu$4ge$1@swifty.westend.com… >>aabne wrote: >>>No… women only let men penetrate them after an exaustive screening >>>process. They deny entry to men in order to control them. Most women do >>>have more spontenious sex but only with highly attractive jock types. >>Okay. You got me. >>My children were conceived in marathon love-fests with >>him: http://makeashorterlink.com/?X50821ABB >>him: http://makeashorterlink.com/?N41825ABB >>and him: http://makeashorterlink.com/?D12852ABB >>My shame is complete. > they look bionic. i .. be drawn more to the skinny type.
I be more drawn to the tall, smart, chubby-soft IT specialist type with the beautiful eyes and smile, and the wicked sense of humor. But alas, I cannot break the stereotype a.s.s. has set for me. It would rend the fabric of the cosmos.
Response:
MrWigglesworth wrote: > Of course, if you’d overheard her saying "I really like it when people > romance me with flowers and chocolates" you’d be here calling her a > spoiled, gold-digging bitch.
Well spotted. – Michaela
Response:
"aabne" <aa…@death.com> wrote in message
news:431813a9$0$25524$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au… > > If a bitch is in a good mood, she will love the flowers you send her. If > she is in a bad mood, she will consider the flowers as stalking.
Quite. I’ve heard ‘You’ve got a really nice body.’ turn into, ‘Yeeaarrchhh! Look at his horrible white legs!’ when she’s with her mates. I mean, what gives here?
Response:
> I love this newsgroup. I learn so much about myself here. > For instance, did you know I want to have sex, ’cause I’m a > jizz-drippin’ slutbag, but I don’t want to take responsibility for it?
No… women only let men penetrate them after an exaustive screening process. They deny entry to men in order to control them. Most women do have more spontenious sex but only with highly attractive jock types. You don’t need to stand on the street corner looking for men to manipulate… they will follow you and do whatever you say.
Response:
LisatheSequel wrote: >> WOMEN ARE INCONSISTENT BITCHSLUTS, THEY WILL MANIPULATE ANY >> SITUATION TO FUCK YOU OVER. And not in a good way. > That is *so* true. > I perch on my bitchslut stump and crane my haggetty neck for men to > manipulate and fuck over *every* *single* *day*. > It’s purt near exhaustin’.
You too? I thought I was the only one. – Michaela
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -LisatheSequel wrote: > aabne wrote: > > > That is so true. > > > I perch on my bitchslut stump and crane my haggetty neck for men > > > to manipulate and fuck over every single day. It’s purt near > > > exhaustin’. > > As a woman who uses usenet, you are not a good example of the > > female kind. You must be ugli. > I love this newsgroup. I learn so much about myself here. > For instance, did you know I want to have sex, ’cause I’m a > jizz-drippin’ slutbag, but I don’t want to take responsibility for it? > My ideal relationship would contain rape on a regular basis. When a > guy brings me flowers I jump up and down on them, cuss and slam back > a whiskey – although I only pretend to be enjoying it to impress my > lesbian, feminist, muff-munching lover. > Odds are I’m on welfare. If I have children they were conceived by > some wimpy, bottom-feeding female apologist who hasn’t been informed > of my brain-washing-wiles by his right-thinking Aryan brothers. > I hang around on street corners with the flab spilling out of my > too-tight, food-stained clothing looking for unsuspecting men to > manipulate and control, and if I can read and type I must be an old, > ugly, past-the-prime, fish-stinking hag. > MAN. I’m a FREAK. I need to sell tickets to myself. I’d make a > fortune!
this has got to be teh funniest poast of zee year! hahahahaha
Response:
JimSummers wrote: > Today I had the strangest thing happen, I was walking to class and > overheard this couple talking and the girl said to the guy, "I hate > that romantic crap like flowers, I mean I love beer and I watch "The > Man Show" > You should have seen the look on the guy’s face, he was CRUSHED and > you could tell that he suddenly felt very disappointed that the girl > was so unemotional. He wanted an old fashioned girly-girl, not a > rowdy poolhall slut. > Have the roles reserved? Are men now the romantic ones?
She may well have been trying to put him off from coming on to her – especially cos you say he looked crushed. – Michaela, I don’t like receiving flowers either. Mike’s bought me one bunch which I gave away within the hour. He’s never bothered since. Rather give me a potplant.
Response:
>Crushed? Thats my dream girl he has there !!!!
Hey, let’s not discount the possibility that she may just be pretending in order to get into his pants. Girls do that too, just like players pretend to be sensitive and understanding. She’ll swear up and down that she doesn’t care about any of that stuff, but as soon as they are in a relationship she’ll start complaining that he never does anything nice for her.
Response:
> That is *so* true. > I perch on my bitchslut stump and crane my haggetty neck for men to > manipulate and fuck over *every* *single* *day*. > It’s purt near exhaustin’.
As a woman who uses usenet, you are not a good example of the female kind. You must be ugli.
Response:
>That is *so* true. >I perch on my bitchslut stump and crane my haggetty neck for men to >manipulate and fuck over *every* *single* *day*. >It’s purt near exhaustin’.
i cook their hearts in a crock-pot… & the man show ended over 1 yr ago. (a successful troll gets his story straight – gurgle) h
Response:
aabne wrote: >> That is *so* true. >> I perch on my bitchslut stump and crane my haggetty neck for men to >> manipulate and fuck over *every* *single* *day*. >> It’s purt near exhaustin’. > As a woman who uses usenet, you are not a good example of the female > kind. You must be ugli.
I love this newsgroup. I learn so much about myself here. For instance, did you know I want to have sex, ’cause I’m a jizz-drippin’ slutbag, but I don’t want to take responsibility for it? My ideal relationship would contain rape on a regular basis. When a guy brings me flowers I jump up and down on them, cuss and slam back a whiskey – although I only pretend to be enjoying it to impress my lesbian, feminist, muff-munching lover. Odds are I’m on welfare. If I have children they were conceived by some wimpy, bottom-feeding female apologist who hasn’t been informed of my brain-washing-wiles by his right-thinking Aryan brothers. I hang around on street corners with the flab spilling out of my too-tight, food-stained clothing looking for unsuspecting men to manipulate and control, and if I can read and type I must be an old, ugly, past-the-prime, fish-stinking hag. MAN. I’m a FREAK. I need to sell tickets to myself. I’d make a fortune!
Response:
>If a bitch is in a good mood, she will love the >flowers you send her. If she is in a bad mood, she >will consider the flowers as stalking.
Well, I have a personal policy not to give flowers to women I’m not already dating (special occasions excepted). It avoids those kind of awkward situations.
Response:
>That is *so* true. >I perch on my bitchslut stump and crane my haggetty >neck for men to >manipulate and fuck over *every* *single* *day*. >It’s purt near exhaustin’.
Bitchslut Stump sounds like a good name for a band.
Response:
>i think most people are .. normal. maybe you pay >too much attention to colour, maybe you should look >for some grey areas.
You will very quickly notice how black and white JimSummers world is. I agree with your post btw.
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -aabne wrote: >> Of course, if you’d overheard her saying "I really like it when people >> romance me with flowers and chocolates" you’d be here calling her a >> spoiled, gold-digging bitch. > The fact is that women don’t really care about romance vs. non-romance > and other aspects of a man’s behaviour. They just use the issue as a way > to control the man, because they love the power. > Men will always be too romantic, or not romantic enough for women. > If a bitch is in a good mood, she will love the flowers you send her. If > she is in a bad mood, she will consider the flowers as stalking. > WOMEN ARE INCONSISTENT BITCHSLUTS, THEY WILL MANIPULATE ANY SITUATION TO > FUCK YOU OVER. And not in a good way.
That is *so* true. I perch on my bitchslut stump and crane my haggetty neck for men to manipulate and fuck over *every* *single* *day*. It’s purt near exhaustin’.
Response:
"JimSummers" <jimsummer…@aol.com> wrote in message
news:cf54042c3fa59ca29f03992145d1b3df@localhost.talkaboutsupport.com… > Today I had the strangest thing happen, I was walking to class and > overheard this couple talking and the girl said to the guy, "I hate that > romantic crap like flowers, I mean I love beer and I watch "The Man Show" > You should have seen the look on the guy’s face, he was CRUSHED and you > could tell that he suddenly felt very disappointed that the girl was so > unemotional. He wanted an old fashioned girly-girl, not a rowdy poolhall > slut. > Have the roles reserved? Are men now the romantic ones?
blech .. there is middle ground you know, between sports, beer, belching; and flowers every day for breakfast, lunch, dinner. i think most people are .. normal. maybe you pay too much attention to colour, maybe you should look for some grey areas. joz — For more information about this NNTP posting service, contact: h…@asarian-host.net — for all info about our server. If you want an anonymous account, visit our sign-up page: https://asarian-host.net/cgi-bin/signup.cgi
Response:
> Of course, if you’d overheard her saying "I really like it when people > romance me with flowers and chocolates" you’d be here calling her a > spoiled, gold-digging bitch.
The fact is that women don’t really care about romance vs. non-romance and other aspects of a man’s behaviour. They just use the issue as a way to control the man, because they love the power. Men will always be too romantic, or not romantic enough for women. If a bitch is in a good mood, she will love the flowers you send her. If she is in a bad mood, she will consider the flowers as stalking. WOMEN ARE INCONSISTENT BITCHSLUTS, THEY WILL MANIPULATE ANY SITUATION TO FUCK YOU OVER. And not in a good way.
Response:
Today I had the strangest thing happen, I was walking to class and overheard this couple talking and the girl said to the guy, "I hate that romantic crap like flowers, I mean I love beer and I watch "The Man Show" You should have seen the look on the guy’s face, he was CRUSHED and you could tell that he suddenly felt very disappointed that the girl was so unemotional. He wanted an old fashioned girly-girl, not a rowdy poolhall slut. Have the roles reserved? Are men now the romantic ones?
Response:
>Have the roles reserved? Are men now the romantic >ones?
No, it’s just that now people of both genders are less inclined to conform to narrow gender stereotypes. After all, look at all the males in this group who don’t like the whole sports, beer and muscle cars thing (myself included, except for the beer). Of course, if you’d overheard her saying "I really like it when people romance me with flowers and chocolates" you’d be here calling her a spoiled, gold-digging bitch.
Response:
Question:
Carl Haffler <chaff…@darthvader.net> wrote in news:Xns96BB4FDA58B90youremailcom@130.81.64.196: > But I’ve been looking back at other times I’ve either engaged in or > witnessed discussions on illegal immigration, and realized that the > "for" group always goes to the same response: label or insult the > "against" group. Call them a bigot. Call them ignorant. Call them > immature.
I think you’re just a dirty slut. — "But," he added, "I think it’s also important for me to go on with my life, to keep a balanced life." George The-Buck-Stops-Elsewhere Bush.
Response:
"Gray Loser" <gray_lo…@hotmail.com> wrote in news:1124778357.750865.278400@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com: > IMO, the latter two (objecting to different language/cultures) aren’t > all bad, because I think preserving your national identity is a > legitimate desire. And it’s legitimate to want to avoid Spanish > becoming a second language, when you are an English speaker.
I swear to god, part of the reason I don’t read the L.A. Times anymore is that half the paper is filled with people who think anyone who doesn’t want to learn Spanish or Swahili is a white facist pig, and by the way did you know that California is legally still part of the Aztec Empire? Finally I realized that the best way to deal with such people is to ignore them as much as possible. — "But," he added, "I think it’s also important for me to go on with my life, to keep a balanced life." George The-Buck-Stops-Elsewhere Bush.
Response:
Mad Mambo Master of Macedonia wrote: – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> "Gray Loser" <gray_lo…@hotmail.com> wrote in > news:1124778357.750865.278400@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com: > > IMO, the latter two (objecting to different language/cultures) > > aren’t all bad, because I think preserving your national identity > > is a legitimate desire. And it’s legitimate to want to avoid > > Spanish becoming a second language, when you are an English speaker. > I swear to god, part of the reason I don’t read the L.A. Times > anymore is that half the paper is filled with people who think anyone > who doesn’t want to learn Spanish or Swahili is a white facist pig, > and by the way did you know that California is legally still part of > the Aztec Empire? Finally I realized that the best way to deal with > such people is to ignore them as much as possible.
Im ready to learn Mayan. I like all those x
Response:
Mad Mambo Master of Macedonia wrote: > "Gray Loser" <gray_lo…@hotmail.com> wrote in > news:1124778357.750865.278400@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com: > > IMO, the latter two (objecting to different language/cultures) aren’t > > all bad, because I think preserving your national identity is a > > legitimate desire. And it’s legitimate to want to avoid Spanish > > becoming a second language, when you are an English speaker. > I swear to god, part of the reason I don’t read the L.A. Times anymore is > that half the paper is filled with people who think anyone who doesn’t want > to learn Spanish or Swahili is a white facist pig, and by the way did you > know that California is legally still part of the Aztec Empire?
Better get cracking with those human sacrifices. All hail the great plumed serpent, Quetzalcoatl.
Response:
Mad Mambo Master of Macedonia wrote: > "Gray Loser" <gray_lo…@hotmail.com> wrote in > news:1124778357.750865.278400@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com: > > IMO, the latter two (objecting to different language/cultures) aren’t > > all bad, because I think preserving your national identity is a > > legitimate desire. And it’s legitimate to want to avoid Spanish > > becoming a second language, when you are an English speaker. > I swear to god, part of the reason I don’t read the L.A. Times anymore is > that half the paper is filled with people who think anyone who doesn’t want > to learn Spanish or Swahili
Goddamned xenophobe! What’s wrong with Swahili?-Elsewhere Bush.
Response:
"Gray Loser" <gray_lo…@hotmail.com> wrote in news:1124848293.497395.61170@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com: – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Mad Mambo Master of Macedonia wrote: >> "Gray Loser" <gray_lo…@hotmail.com> wrote in >> news:1124778357.750865.278400@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com: >> > IMO, the latter two (objecting to different language/cultures) >> > aren’t all bad, because I think preserving your national identity >> > is a legitimate desire. And it’s legitimate to want to avoid >> > Spanish becoming a second language, when you are an English >> > speaker. >> I swear to god, part of the reason I don’t read the L.A. Times >> anymore is that half the paper is filled with people who think anyone >> who doesn’t want to learn Spanish or Swahili > Goddamned xenophobe! What’s wrong with Swahili?-Elsewhere Bush.
Happy Kwanzaa! — "But," he added, "I think it’s also important for me to go on with my life, to keep a balanced life." George The-Buck-Stops-Elsewhere Bush.
Response:
"Ms pnoopie Pnats" <dash…@noemaila.com> wrote in news:degifi$v9k $…@pita.alt.net: – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Mad Mambo Master of Macedonia wrote: >> "Gray Loser" <gray_lo…@hotmail.com> wrote in >> news:1124778357.750865.278400@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com: >> > IMO, the latter two (objecting to different language/cultures) >> > aren’t all bad, because I think preserving your national identity >> > is a legitimate desire. And it’s legitimate to want to avoid >> > Spanish becoming a second language, when you are an English speaker. >> I swear to god, part of the reason I don’t read the L.A. Times >> anymore is that half the paper is filled with people who think anyone >> who doesn’t want to learn Spanish or Swahili is a white facist pig, >> and by the way did you know that California is legally still part of >> the Aztec Empire? Finally I realized that the best way to deal with >> such people is to ignore them as much as possible. > Im ready to learn Mayan. I like all those x
green x & ham?
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -Lash Rambo wrote: > "Ms pnoopie Pnats" <dash…@noemaila.com> wrote in news:degifi$v9k > $…@pita.alt.net: > > Mad Mambo Master of Macedonia wrote: > >> "Gray Loser" <gray_lo…@hotmail.com> wrote in > >> news:1124778357.750865.278400@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com: > >> > IMO, the latter two (objecting to different language/cultures) > >> > aren’t all bad, because I think preserving your national identity > >> > is a legitimate desire. And it’s legitimate to want to avoid > >> > Spanish becoming a second language, when you are an English > speaker. >> > > >> I swear to god, part of the reason I don’t read the L.A. Times > >> anymore is that half the paper is filled with people who think > anyone >> who doesn’t want to learn Spanish or Swahili is a white > facist pig, >> and by the way did you know that California is legally > still part of >> the Aztec Empire? Finally I realized that the best > way to deal with >> such people is to ignore them as much as > possible. > > Im ready to learn Mayan. I like all those x > green x & ham?
that is such a good book :p
Response:
Just as soon as you can get shut-in retards like "Jumbo Jim Summers" out of their mommy’s apartment and run their blubbery asses out into a field to pick tomatoes… Otherwise – leave the Mexies alone. We need them. ZenDog
Response:
>You should tell that bitch to shut up and go wash some underwear in her >sink. She probably lusts illegal immigrants to rape her brutally. Lots of >females and gays here are after illegal immigrants like albanians, >pakistans and africans to corress their starved holes. Most of them would >do everything for money, so those sluts lure them into their bed easily.
How old were you when your dick fell off? ZenDog
Response:
"Carl Haffler" <chaff…@darthvader.net> wrote in message
news:Xns96BAD69D1B516youremailcom@130.81.64.196… > and not be a bigot?
Sure. You even have an easy excuse, now that Al Qaeda has suitcase nukes and has supposedly already smuggled some of them in via the Mexican border.
Response:
On 22 Aug 2005 23:25:57 -0700, "Gray Loser" <gray_lo…@hotmail.com> wrote: <snip> >IMO, the latter two (objecting to different language/cultures) aren’t >all bad, because I think preserving your national identity is a >legitimate desire. And it’s legitimate to want to avoid Spanish >becoming a second language, when you are an English speaker.
I agree on the language part, as it is understandable that people would want to continue communicating in the language they know, but not the culture part. What the heck is culture anyway, and why should anyone want to preserve it? (And since when does the US really have one.) From one I’ve seen, "culture" is just a bunch of people blindly doing what other people do. Whatever. I have yet to come across a culture I like. — RK
Response:
On Wed, 24 Aug 2005 04:14:36 GMT, Mad Mambo Master of Macedonia <n…@newb.com> wrote: >"Gray Loser" <gray_lo…@hotmail.com> wrote in >news:1124848293.497395.61170@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com: >> Mad Mambo Master of Macedonia wrote: <snip> >>> I swear to god, part of the reason I don’t read the L.A. Times >>> anymore is that half the paper is filled with people who think anyone >>> who doesn’t want to learn Spanish or Swahili >> Goddamned xenophobe! What’s wrong with Swahili?-Elsewhere Bush. >Happy Kwanzaa!
Heh … Kwanzaa was made up in the US anyway. I would be surprised if even 5% of those who "celebrate" it know Swahili. — RK
Response:
Carl Haffler wrote: > and not be a bigot?
i dunno im tryink to get owt of dis country :p
Response:
>i dunno im tryink to get owt of dis country :p
To be with Victor in Australia? Don’t speak any foreign languages or you’ll end up in Baxter Detention Centre 
Response:
MrWigglesworth wrote: > > i dunno im tryink to get owt of dis country :p > To be with Victor in Australia? Don’t speak any foreign languages or > you’ll end up in Baxter Detention Centre
i speak pnats. :p id end up in teh perth mental hopsital if people heard that. 
Response:
Carl Haffler wrote: > and not be a bigot?
It’s not fair that illegal immigrants get away without paying taxes and get to live here so I don’t think you have to be a bigot.
Response:
>and not be a bigot?
You are playing into the media’s trap by fearing certain trigger words like "bigot" and "racist". Once you realize that this whole system is built as an Anti-White structure you can liberate yourself from the need to please them.
Response:
Carl Haffler wrote: > and not be a bigot?
Absolutely. Is it possible to be opposed to LEGAL immigration and not be a bigot? That’s a little trickier.
Response:
"Jim Winters" <extremereactionfo…@yahoo.com> wrote in news:1124770149.732912.243480@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com: > Carl Haffler wrote: >> and not be a bigot? > Absolutely. > Is it possible to be opposed to LEGAL immigration and not be a bigot? > That’s a little trickier.
Sure it’s possible. Perhaps one believes the target region to be overpopulated. Perhaps one is not a bigot, but the majority of people in the target region are, and one fears for the safety of the immigrants. Etc. I wonder if Carl had a specific case in mind.
Response:
Carl Haffler wrote: > and not be a bigot?
yep
Response:
Jim Winters wrote: > Carl Haffler wrote: >>and not be a bigot? > Absolutely. > Is it possible to be opposed to LEGAL immigration and not be a bigot?
yep
Response:
Carl Haffler wrote: > and not be a bigot?
Sure, the way it’s possible to be opposed to any other illegal activity.
Response:
Jim Winters wrote: > Carl Haffler wrote: > > and not be a bigot? > Absolutely. > Is it possible to be opposed to LEGAL immigration and not be a bigot?
It depends whether you discriminate by ethnicity and/or country of origin. If you’re, say, an American who’s opposed to immigration from white English Canadians, then I can’t really see how that makes you a bigot, given the extreme similarity of cultures. You could just not want your country swamped with immigrants. It’s a legitimate desire. In practice, though, people tend to object to immigration by people of different ethnicities/languages/cultures. IMO, the latter two (objecting to different language/cultures) aren’t all bad, because I think preserving your national identity is a legitimate desire. And it’s legitimate to want to avoid Spanish becoming a second language, when you are an English speaker.
Response:
On Tue, 23 Aug 2005 11:50:58 GMT, Carl Haffler <chaff…@darthvader.net> wrote: >Yeah, I was eating breakfast at IHOP with my father. He commented how in >New Mexico there was a push to allow illegal immigrants to get drivers’ >licenses. We were going off on the ways that it would be a bad idea and >then the woman in the booth next to us said "excuse me? If you insist on >being bigots, could you do it a little lower?"
Ahhh, IHOP… Where I live in upstate NY most people who go to IHOP are either blacks or white apologists, so it doesn’t surprise me that the white woman (I believe you stated she was white in the paragraph below) would have a "problem" with you and your father stating the obvious as to the perils of illegal immigration. Most women are pathetic creatures who cannot relate to logic. It is no wonder this country is sinking into third world status with the feminization of the white American culture these past 40 years. >(Was volume the issue? No, >we then started talking about video games and the volume didn’t bother >her at all then. It was purely about her desire to call us bigots since >two people talking against something she’s in favor of was obviously too >abhorrent for her to allow.)
You are correct. She did not want to hear the truth or any logical rational as to why illegal immigration is NOT a good thing for America, therefore, since she had no valid or logical arguments to refute what you and your father were discussing she resorted to typical feminist name calling. You and your father are the bad ones, and she is the good one. Enough said. >Sadly, I’ve given the cow more thought than she deserves.
You are right, unfortunately there are more cows where she came from, and perhaps it is time for people (especially whites) to begin to stand up for their opinions without having to cower behind the dreaded fear of being called a bigot by the leftist/politically correct/feminized/masses. >But I’ve been looking back at other times I’ve either engaged in or >witnessed discussions on illegal immigration, and realized that the >"for" group always goes to the same response: label or insult the >"against" group. Call them a bigot. Call them ignorant. Call them >immature.
Propaganda works better than logic and the "for" group has learned from the best how to promote the glories of illegal immigration, especially to the average American boob tube watcher. >But I’ve never once seen someone in favor of illegal immigration actually >try to, y’know, make a case for it. (No, wait, they sometimes make the >"but they take jobs that Americans won’t take." Which they then nullify >by insisting that the illegal immigrants’ rights should be protected, and >they should earn more money/work less hours, which would of course then >make the jobs pallatable to the low-income Americans and negate any need >for the illegal immigrants.)
There you go again with your damn logic. The "for" group does not need to make a case for illegal immigration, all they need to do is recite some catch phrases over and over again, such as "diversity is our strength", "America is a melting pot", "America was built by immigrants", etc. etc. and bingo, the case is made. The "for" group knows that if they can indoctrinate the young in public schools to the glories of illegal immigration, no logic will ever need to be made in the future, as the kiddies will have been brainwashed to accept illegal immigration, no questions asked. >It was also kind of funny/ridiculous to witness a white woman calling two >Puerto Ricans bigots.
In my opinion, there is nothing wrong with being called a bigot by the unwashed masses, hard is it may be to believe, I have been called worse. pug http://home.earthlink.net/~crpbx66/
Response:
Question:
You’ve probably seen this on the news by now. I heard on Nancy Grace that some of these women "identify" with the bad boys and their crimes. The trick must be to make yourself look pathetic enough to be appealing, but not go overboard to enter loser territory. -LG http://edition.cnn.com/2005/US/08/09/inmates.escape/ Dragnet out for fugitive and wife Aug 10 2005 The incident began about 10 a.m. as guards escorted George Hyatte in handcuffs and leg irons from the Roane Country Courthouse following a proceeding on an armed robbery charge, authorities said. As the armed corrections officers prepared to put Hyatte into a waiting van, "a dark-colored SUV appeared behind the van," Washam said. "Mr. Hyatte hollered, ‘Shoot ‘em!’ "She opened fire on the officers, hitting one in the abdomen," he said. The other officer fired a shot, but the SUV sped off, stopping only to pick up Hyatte, who had run to another part of the parking lot, a witness said. … Jennifer Hyatte was fired in August 2004 from her job as a contract licensed practical nurse at Northwest Correctional Complex in Tiptonville for having an inappropriate relationship with Hyatte, said Darrell Alley, a Tennessee Department of Corrections spokesman. Alley said she was caught smuggling food from a restaurant into the prison and acknowledged to officials that it was for Hyatte. At the time, they were not married and she called herself Jennifer Forsyth, Alley said. George Hyatte escaped from county jail twice before, said Sheryl Jordan, chief deputy court clerk for Rhea County, 70 miles from Kingston. The first escape was in 1998; the second in 2002, she said. Hyatte has been convicted of aggravated assault, aggravated burglary and burglary in the third degree, felonies dating to 1989. He was sentenced in 1998 to 36 months for the first of his prior escapes.
Response:
Lonely God wrote: > You’ve probably seen this on the news by now. I heard on Nancy Grace > that some of these women "identify" with the bad boys and their > crimes.
This is the feminist version of "the devil made me do it." The line of reasoning would be more comical if it didn’t work. > The trick must be to make yourself look pathetic enough to be > appealing, but not go overboard to enter loser territory. -LG
Exactly, and at this, she has failed. She killed a corrections officer while aiding in the escape of a prisoner. In Texas, that’s a needle. In Tennessee, it’s either a needle, or it’s a sentence so long that she will die in prison. No amount of poor-widdle-me whining will get her out of this one. Even the sympathetic press, which has already started as seen below, can’t help her now. > http://edition.cnn.com/2005/US/08/09/inmates.escape/ > Dragnet out for fugitive and wife > Aug 10 2005
That’s actually two fugitives, CNN. I guarantee she’s as wanted as he is, but that won’t stop CNN from minimizing her actions. > The incident began about 10 a.m. as guards escorted George Hyatte in > handcuffs and leg irons from the Roane Country Courthouse following > a proceeding on an armed robbery charge, authorities said.
Bad man! Boo! Hiss!! > As the armed corrections officers prepared to put Hyatte into a
Why would CNN point out to us that the corrections officers were armed? Could it be …. to avoid giving the impression that she fired on unarmed men? To avoid making her crime seem worse? Or perhaps they thought we’d be shocked and amazed that a corrections officer would be packing heat. > waiting van, "a dark-colored SUV appeared behind the van," Washam > said. "Mr. Hyatte hollered, ‘Shoot ‘em!’
Mean man making his SUV-driving wife do terrible things. Boo! Hiss! > "She opened fire on the officers, hitting one in the abdomen," he > said.
Here’s how I’d write this if I wasn’t some cowed writer trying to help a hewpwess wimmin. "She shot one of the officers in the abdomen." > The other officer fired a shot,
Golly, CNN! Do you mean this was a gunfight that she won, and not a cold-blooded shooting that she perpetrated? Thanks, CNN! I was starting to think she was a criminal or something! [...] > Jennifer Hyatte was fired in August 2004 from her job as a contract > licensed practical nurse
See? See how nice she is? She’s a nurse! Thank you CNN. [...] > Hyatte has been convicted of aggravated assault, aggravated burglary > and burglary in the third degree, felonies dating to 1989. He was > sentenced in 1998 to 36 months for the first of his prior escapes.
See? See what a meanie he is? It _must_ be his fault. He must have made her do it. Of course you’d never know that if CNN didn’t tell you. Ugh. The media bias wouldn’t be so bad if they would actually admit to being biased.
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -greg1…@yahoo.com wrote: > Lonely God wrote: > Even the sympathetic press, which has already started as seen below, > can’t help her now. > > http://edition.cnn.com/2005/US/08/09/inmates.escape/ > > Dragnet out for fugitive and wife > > Aug 10 2005 > That’s actually two fugitives, CNN. I guarantee she’s as wanted as he > is, but that won’t stop CNN from minimizing her actions. > > The incident began about 10 a.m. as guards escorted George Hyatte in > > handcuffs and leg irons from the Roane Country Courthouse following > a proceeding on an armed robbery charge, authorities said. > Bad man! Boo! Hiss!!
They are just stating the fact that was in cuffs and leg irons. It shows he was considered a dangerous offender. > > As the armed corrections officers prepared to put Hyatte into a > Why would CNN point out to us that the corrections officers were armed? > Could it be …. to avoid giving the impression that she fired on > unarmed men? To avoid making her crime seem worse? Or perhaps they > thought we’d be shocked and amazed that a corrections officer would be > packing heat.
It shows how brazen an attack this was. > > waiting van, "a dark-colored SUV appeared behind the van," Washam > > said. "Mr. Hyatte hollered, ‘Shoot ‘em!’ > Mean man making his SUV-driving wife do terrible things. Boo! Hiss!
Uh, the fact that he yelled this is an important fact. Shows he had prior knowledge of the escape plan. > > "She opened fire on the officers, hitting one in the abdomen," he > > said. > Here’s how I’d write this if I wasn’t some cowed writer trying to help > a hewpwess wimmin. "She shot one of the officers in the abdomen."
OK, I have NO idea how that first version shows ANY bias. It’s just a different way of phrasing the same basic FACTS. > > The other officer fired a shot, > Golly, CNN! Do you mean this was a gunfight that she won, and not a > cold-blooded shooting that she perpetrated? Thanks, CNN! I was > starting to think she was a criminal or something!
Golly, the FACT that he fired back is a rather important thing to put in a news report. Especially since it shows why the police think they will be seaking medical attention. No bias there > [...] > > Jennifer Hyatte was fired in August 2004 from her job as a contract > > licensed practical nurse > See? See how nice she is? She’s a nurse! Thank you CNN.
Again, she WAS a nurse, CNN isn’t making this up. They are just explaining how she met the guy. > [...] > > Hyatte has been convicted of aggravated assault, aggravated burglary > and burglary in the third degree, felonies dating to 1989. He was > > sentenced in 1998 to 36 months for the first of his prior escapes.
Don’t you think the escapee’s criminal record belongs in a news report of this nature? > See? See what a meanie he is? It _must_ be his fault. He must have > made her do it. Of course you’d never know that if CNN didn’t tell > you. > Ugh. The media bias wouldn’t be so bad if they would actually admit to > being biased.
You probably could find media bias in a weather report! ("Partly cloudy! those damned liberals!")
Response:
Lonely God <Delldude@^Gatewaydaemon^.org> wrote in news:42fa097b$0$22209$39cecf19@news.twtelecom.net: > You’ve probably seen this on the news by now. I heard on Nancy Grace > that some of these women "identify" with the bad boys and their > crimes. The trick must be to make yourself look pathetic enough to be > appealing, but not go overboard to enter loser territory. -LG
A typical characteristic of a sociopath is charm–the ability to exploit others without reciprocity. Nancy Grace is fucking psychotic bitch, anyway. > http://edition.cnn.com/2005/US/08/09/inmates.escape/
– http://www.tubafrenzy.org/weblog/archives/timeMag.jpg
Response:
G_fourm…@yahoo.com wrote in news:1123700139.141245.317440@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com: >> > The incident began about 10 a.m. as guards escorted George Hyatte >> > in handcuffs and leg irons from the Roane Country Courthouse >> > following > a proceeding on an armed robbery charge, authorities >> > said. >> Bad man! Boo! Hiss!! > They are just stating the fact that was in cuffs and leg irons. It > shows he was considered a dangerous offender.
Had I been that guard, I hope that I would have thought quickly enough to shoot that fucker in the back–er, by mistake. Of course. — http://www.tubafrenzy.org/weblog/archives/timeMag.jpg
Response:
>A typical characteristic of a sociopath is charm–the ability to exploit
others without >reciprocity. Typical female apologist mentality, you refuse to blame the woman for her worship of BAD BOYS.
Response:
Question:
Reading this extensive "Bad Boy" Vs. "Nice Guy" debate on here makes me realize that I was completely unprepared for how to behave with females until I started reading about it on the internet. Honestly, if I had gotten a girlfriend in 1999 when I wasn’t visiting groups like this, I would have acted like a wimpy nice guy and been immediately dumped. I was not able to handle interaction with women until I met other strong males who gave me the truth about them!!!!
Response:
I read the title of this post and thought "Wow, Jim has actually learned something!", but then the contents turn out to be the same Nice Guy vs Bad Boy stuff. Don’t believe everything you read on the internet, Jim, especially in groups like this. If the guys were so successful with women, they wouldn’t be here. Yes, do not act like a wimpy nice guy. Or more specifically, do not act wimpy… the "nice" is irrelevant.
Response:
>Don’t believe everything you read on the internet, Jim, especially in
groups like this. If the guys were so successful with women, they >wouldn’t be here.
But have you read the recent posts by MemeWarrior? He is really beginning to pile up the data that women want BAD BOYS. I’m looking forward to more of his research as I consider his honesty very reliable.
Response:
>But have you read the recent posts by MemeWarrior? >He is really beginning to pile up the data that >women want BAD BOYS. I’m looking forward to more of >his research as I consider his honesty very >reliable.
Unless I’ve missed something (entirely possible) he’s only been posting personal anecdotes. But then, if someone provided solid evidence counter to your theories, you’d just dismiss him/her as a feminist stooge or female apologist.
Response:
>Unless I’ve missed something (entirely possible) he’s only been posting
personal anecdotes. But then, if someone provided solid evidence counter to your theories, you’d just dismiss him/her as a >feminist stooge or female apologist. Meme’s research is without an agenda, your "research" is always slanted toward whatever optimistic spin makes you feel good to believe in.
Response:
>Meme’s research is without an agenda, your >"research" is always slanted toward whatever >optimistic spin makes you feel good to believe in.
I’ve never claimed to post any research. Just my personal experiences. And I don’t think an optimistic spin is necessarily a bad thing. Better than a pessimistic spin, at any rate.
Response:
> Meme’s research is without an agenda,
LOL
Response:
michaelashouse wrote: >> Meme’s research is without an agenda, > LOL
My ‘research’ is purely my observations which are actully counter any agenda I might have. Some things are just undeniable and I can’t go on ignoring them anymore.
Response:
mWarrior wrote: > michaelashouse wrote: >>> Meme’s research is without an agenda, >> LOL > My ‘research’ is purely my observations which are actully counter any > agenda I might have. Some things are just undeniable and I can’t go on > ignoring them anymore.
so you have an agenda.
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -michaelashouse wrote: > mWarrior wrote: >>michaelashouse wrote: >>>> Meme’s research is without an agenda, >>>LOL >>My ‘research’ is purely my observations which are actully counter any >>agenda I might have. Some things are just undeniable and I can’t go on >>ignoring them anymore. > so you have an agenda.
My agenda is to overcome my social shortcomings and be happy. Which gets harder and harder as more of reality becomes apparent to me.
Response:
mWarrior wrote: > michaelashouse wrote: > > mWarrior wrote: > >>michaelashouse wrote: > >>>> Meme’s research is without an agenda, > >>>LOL > >>My ‘research’ is purely my observations which are actully counter any > >>agenda I might have. Some things are just undeniable and I can’t go on > >>ignoring them anymore. > > so you have an agenda. > My agenda is to overcome my social shortcomings and be happy. Which gets > harder and harder as more of reality becomes apparent to me.
Perhaps it becomes harder and harder the more you pay attention to the problem instead of the potential solutions? – Michaela
Response:
Michaela Mackenzie wrote: > Perhaps it becomes harder and harder the more you pay attention > to the problem instead of the potential solutions?
So what’s the solution? become more of an asshole? This doesn’t seem appealing to me. I would almost rather be alone. I think I’m begin to understand why so many men ‘escaped into the cloth’ in the past and became preists. They were running from the pressures of women.
Response:
mWarrior wrote: > Michaela Mackenzie wrote: >> Perhaps it becomes harder and harder the more you pay attention >> to the problem instead of the potential solutions? > So what’s the solution? become more of an asshole?
No. Become more assertive, more relaxed, more communicative, more outgoing, more interesting, whatever. This doesn’t seem > appealing to me. I would almost rather be alone. > I think I’m begin to understand why so many men ‘escaped into the > cloth’ in the past and became preists. They were running from the > pressures of women.
No they knew what jesus meant when he said "be in this world not of it". IOW don’t attach to this world. Don’t let your happiness depend on anything but yourself. – Michaela
Response:
>No. Become more assertive, more relaxed, more communicative, more
outgoing, more interesting, >whatever. Be more specific, what should he be assertive about? What if he feels that to assert weak parts of his personality is what he really wants? Is it assertive to deny showing that to the world? Relaxed? A lot of that is dictated by Biology and the rate of blood flow, circulation, it is not all mental. I’ve seen some incredibly stupid people who are VERY "relaxed" but it is only because their mental functioning runs at such a sub-par rate, I wouldn’t consider it a good thing.
Response:
JimSummers wrote: > >No. Become more assertive, more relaxed, more communicative, more > outgoing, more interesting, >whatever. > Be more specific, what should he be assertive about? What if he feels > that to assert weak parts of his personality is what he really wants?
When women "assert" "weak" parts of themselves you knock them (e.g. sleeping around) Is > it assertive to deny showing that to the world?
It’s positive-speak. By not giving it too much attention it becomes less significant and gives you a chance to think of other things and to see opportunities instead of just doom. > Relaxed? A lot of that is dictated by Biology and the rate of blood > flow, circulation, it is not all mental.
Hmmm. I disagree. AFAICT thought creates. Again, I point you to that story of the girl who stopped swimming cos she couldn’t see her destination. If you can see it in your mind’s eye, it *is* possible. I’ve seen some incredibly stupid > people who are VERY "relaxed" but it is only because their mental > functioning runs at such a sub-par rate, I wouldn’t consider it a good > thing.
Perhaps you wouldn’t but you seem to be saying that they’re happy and you’re not. So who’s better off in the end? – Michaela
Response:
>If you can see it in your mind’s eye, it *is* >possible.
I have no control over my thoughts or emotions. I am a trauma survivor who suffered years of abuse which has forever altered my nervous system.
Response:
JimSummers wrote: > >If you can see it in your mind’s eye, it *is* > >possible. > I have no control over my thoughts or emotions. I am a trauma survivor > who suffered years of abuse which has forever altered my nervous system.
You *always* have choice. Always. Always. Always. You just don’t want to have a choice cos that’ll mean you have to stop blaming others and get off your butt and work at becoming a better (whatever that means) person. – Michaela
Response:
Michaela Mackenzie wrote: > You *always* have choice. Always. Always. Always. > You just don’t want to have a choice cos that’ll mean > you have to stop blaming others and get off your butt > and work at becoming a better (whatever that means) > person.
You are right about that Michaela. Their is only one thing that a person can ever have control over and that is their thoughts.
Response:
>You are right about that Michaela. Their is only one thing that a person
can ever have control >over and that is their thoughts. Not really, we all have certain desires that we have difficulty suppressing.
Response:
>Honestly, if I had gotten a girlfriend in 1999 when I wasn’t visiting groups like this, I >would have acted like a wimpy nice guy and been immediately dumped.
Experience, even if bad, would have served you much better than reading misogynistic rants on usened. If you had gotten a gf then, things would be a lot easier for you today .
Response:
>Honestly, if I had gotten a girlfriend in 1999 when I wasn’t visiting groups like this, I >would have acted like a wimpy nice guy and been immediately dumped.
Experience, even if bad, would have served you much better than reading misogynistic rants on usenet. If you had gotten a gf then, things would be a lot easier for you today .
Response:
Question:
> Just see how the "sweet virgin girl" lets some dj finger her while she offers > him a bj in the back of his car.
healthy fun… {you’re 2 negative} h
Response:
> So you (though a non-virgin) would find it fun to offer a hj&bj to a man > you barely know in the back of his car?
context is everything h
Response:
I used to read this forums a lot 2 years ago, even posted sometimes, but I eventually leaved them because the techniques they talked about, sounded like a lot of BS. I’ll check them out again, tough, maybe now they’ve improved.
Response:
"helen" <helens_pi…@yahoo.com> wrote in news:1122345721.318811.204050 @o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com: >> So you (though a non-virgin) would find it fun to offer a hj&bj to a man >> you barely know in the back of his car? > context is everything > h
Sure, it would be a good movtivation for her to continue her feminist screed about how every man she’s fucked on a whim is gone in the morning
Response:
> … about how every man she’s fucked on a whim is gone in the morning
let’s just hope so… h
Response:
> fucked on a whim
whimsical fuckery! how…eeevile! (nice name for a grrl punk band…) h
Response:
"helen" <helens_pi…@yahoo.com> wrote in news:1122530130.975690.110290 @g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com: >> fucked on a whim > whimsical fuckery! how…eeevile! > (nice name for a grrl punk band…) > h
I’d go with Fucking Whimsicree Bollox. But then again, I always say that. — Damn, it feels good to be a gangsta.
Response:
"helen" <helens_pi…@yahoo.com> wrote in news:1122530021.706862.163660 @f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com: >> … about how every man she’s fucked on a whim is gone in the morning > let’s just hope so… > h
DVD Collection Ends One-Night Stand (The Onion). — Damn, it feels good to be a gangsta.
Response:
>I used to read this forums a lot 2 years ago, even posted sometimes,
but I eventually leaved them because the techniques they talked about, sounded like a lot >of BS. There is a lot of crap on that forum. The stupidest idea was that you should rub your arm against a girl’s tits while you are trying to chat her up for the first time…INSANE..might as well hire a good attorney if you are going to do that… The other problem is that you have no idea what those guys on the forum look like OR what kind of chicks they are having sex with. I’ve learned long ago that one guy’s "hot chick" is another guy’s average lay out of boredom.
Response:
Question:
my mate can be a bastard. he fucking tickles me. the other day he grabbed my feet and pulled me off my sofa. he wouldn’t stop tickling my feet. he can be fucking annoying. now i’m paranoid about my mates too. it was that magazine that set me off. i heard a feminist comedienne joke on TV that it was possible to snap a man’s dick in two when it’s errect, but this madwoman went and fucking did it. It did my head in, they shouldn’t put stories in magazines like that where they can disturb people. I’m imagining lots of fuckwit teenage girls reading it and giggling like it’s really funny. It’s like when I turned on cable TV late at night once and there was a fetish show on, and these crazy girls were eating shit. They’d mashed it into a kind of puree, and one of them said "It’s really goooooood to have poop that you can eat", and then they were smearing it on each other. I nearly went into a mad rage that time. I went into a mad rage last year when the woman over the road had a all night party. I put my music on as loud as fuck and leant out of the window yelling at them. Some bloke came over and gave me some verbal. I was going through a time when I couldn’t fucking sleep at all and I’d nodded off after getting very very drunk, before the party woke me up. Plus it was 9/11 and I was feeling a bit fucked up about it and didn’t think they should be partying on that day, the anniversary of the twin towers. the world is a giant conspiracy to do your fucking head in. — kez
Response:
"kez" <kelseyle…@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
news:3kladhFuuh5dU1@individual.net… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> my mate can be a bastard. he fucking tickles me. the other day he grabbed > my feet and pulled me off my sofa. he wouldn’t stop tickling my feet. he > can be fucking annoying. > now i’m paranoid about my mates too. it was that magazine that set me off. > i heard a feminist comedienne joke on TV that it was possible to snap a > man’s dick in two when it’s errect, but this madwoman went and fucking did > it. It did my head in, they shouldn’t put stories in magazines like that > where they can disturb people. I’m imagining lots of fuckwit teenage girls > reading it and giggling like it’s really funny. > It’s like when I turned on cable TV late at night once and there was a > fetish show on, and these crazy girls were eating shit. They’d mashed it > into a kind of puree, and one of them said "It’s really goooooood to have > poop that you can eat", and then they were smearing it on each other. I > nearly went into a mad rage that time. > I went into a mad rage last year when the woman over the road had a all > night party. I put my music on as loud as fuck and leant out of the window > yelling at them. Some bloke came over and gave me some verbal. I was going > through a time when I couldn’t fucking sleep at all and I’d nodded off > after getting very very drunk, before the party woke me up. Plus it was > 9/11 and I was feeling a bit fucked up about it and didn’t think they > should be partying on that day, the anniversary of the twin towers. > the world is a giant conspiracy to do your fucking head in. > — kez
This same mate who tickles me, laughed his tits off when the twin towers got bombed, and was quite jolly about London recently. He was saying the other night he’d like to meet his classmates from school again so he could do them in. He wants to get an electric stun gun for when he goes out at night. Blimey and the coppers are now blowing peoples heads off. Do you know that two ordinary dads got beaten to death by teenage boys here recently? It made the news. One of them refused to light a cigarette for a lad, and the other one went out to protect his car. And a guy got stabbed to death in my town over the weekend. Gordon Bennett, what a world. I feel harmless by comparison. — kez
Response:
Blimey and coppers? Its fun to read your British lingo. And its good to know that you haven’t lost any of the words over centuries. I used to read English classic books and I loved them. "kez" <kelseyle…@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
news:3klariFq3s7jU1@individual.net… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> "kez" <kelseyle…@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message > news:3kladhFuuh5dU1@individual.net… >> my mate can be a bastard. he fucking tickles me. the other day he grabbed >> my feet and pulled me off my sofa. he wouldn’t stop tickling my feet. he >> can be fucking annoying. >> now i’m paranoid about my mates too. it was that magazine that set me >> off. i heard a feminist comedienne joke on TV that it was possible to >> snap a man’s dick in two when it’s errect, but this madwoman went and >> fucking did it. It did my head in, they shouldn’t put stories in >> magazines like that where they can disturb people. I’m imagining lots of >> fuckwit teenage girls reading it and giggling like it’s really funny. >> It’s like when I turned on cable TV late at night once and there was a >> fetish show on, and these crazy girls were eating shit. They’d mashed it >> into a kind of puree, and one of them said "It’s really goooooood to have >> poop that you can eat", and then they were smearing it on each other. I >> nearly went into a mad rage that time. >> I went into a mad rage last year when the woman over the road had a all >> night party. I put my music on as loud as fuck and leant out of the >> window yelling at them. Some bloke came over and gave me some verbal. I >> was going through a time when I couldn’t fucking sleep at all and I’d >> nodded off after getting very very drunk, before the party woke me up. >> Plus it was 9/11 and I was feeling a bit fucked up about it and didn’t >> think they should be partying on that day, the anniversary of the twin >> towers. >> the world is a giant conspiracy to do your fucking head in. >> — kez > This same mate who tickles me, laughed his tits off when the twin towers > got bombed, and was quite jolly about London recently. He was saying the > other night he’d like to meet his classmates from school again so he could > do them in. He wants to get an electric stun gun for when he goes out at > night. > Blimey and the coppers are now blowing peoples heads off. Do you know that > two ordinary dads got beaten to death by teenage boys here recently? It > made the news. One of them refused to light a cigarette for a lad, and the > other one went out to protect his car. And a guy got stabbed to death in > my town over the weekend. > Gordon Bennett, what a world. I feel harmless by comparison. > — kez
Response:
Maybe I belong to a lower class of sex men but there ain’t no way you can snap my wiener in two while its erect. Its basically all sponge tissue. No matter how hard it gets. Reminds me of an old Mae West quote. She was talking with a friend who declared, "A good man is hard to find." Mae West said in response, "A hard man is good to find". I understand that in certain places they train the women by having them pick up pin pong balls while squatting on the floor. And then I heard that there’s an african tribe whooze women can literally capture a man making withdrawl impossible. After all is said and done…tell me the truth…Remember Alka sletzer tablets? I think there is a kazillion sexual things that can be done with alka seltzer tablets if you pause to consider it. Alka Seltzer tablets are WAY cool, right? Gallactic Boss, Damo XIV
Response:
"Galactic Boss Damo the XIV" <damod…@webtv.net> wrote in message news:21454-42E93880-134@storefull-3235.bay.webtv.net… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Maybe I belong to a lower class of sex men but there ain’t no way you > can snap my wiener in two while its erect. > Its basically all sponge tissue. > No matter how hard it gets. > Reminds me of an old Mae West quote. > She was talking with a friend who declared, "A good man is hard to > find." > Mae West said in response, "A hard man is good to find". > I understand that in certain places they train the women by having them > pick up pin pong balls while squatting on the floor. > And then I heard that there’s an african tribe whooze women can > literally capture a man making withdrawl impossible. > After all is said and done…tell me the truth…Remember Alka sletzer > tablets? > I think there is a kazillion sexual things that can be done with alka > seltzer tablets if you pause to consider it. > Alka Seltzer tablets are WAY cool, right? > Gallactic Boss, > Damo XIV
Yeah it must have been one of those made up tabloid magazine stories, damn, glad i didn’t believe the one about the double decker bus found on the moon. — kez
Response:
Question:
Are you of the Church of Subgenius? Regarding romance, no. I’ve struggled towards it through a morass of deception comprised by, well, people like you, and proved it to exist. I even have evidence. http://www.shadowpoetry.com/bookstore/poemstojulia.html "Sing of hardness of walls" – Aye my friend, BUT WHAT’S UNDER THE WALL? – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Dear Ilya:
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – So Mr. Bat had a fine ole night hooting with the owls! And not only the owls, but the howls. The owls make the howls and the howls make the owls and over the backbone of the H they form a mirror image of each other. As in, eviLive. It’s been a fine night for Mr. Bat, out on the streets of Alexandria. First I read Mr. Khodorkovsky’s epistle from the jail: "True freedom is within," "a result of pursuing one’s principles" – and of course the main question to ask is, "Are your principles truly yours?" And then, "By what authority?" And then, "After what process?" And finally, "To what extent true?" (and of course the idea that transitional stuff is destructive: No, you first reject what you don’t like, then you figure out what you do like and affirm it). (and the correlated concept of self-awareness: Self-awareness in terms of a false set of beliefs is wrong and can only be done in terms of true beliefs) (and the corollary concept of taking responsibility for one’s life: That only becomes possible truly when you’ve studied and experienced and have an informed knowledge of what you truly want: all else leads to wasted lives). After philosophy class (continuing education program) at the community college, in which was discussed Spinosa’s concept of God being self-existing manifesting through all people who are modes (and it is the purpose of the mode, I presume, to refract the light until it creates a picture that is most appealing, with each mode shaped by substance & reshaping substance and self and – hey, Mr. Self-existing One, could you please notice me and what I’ve done with your substance (oh and tell me the true causes of things, in what cases it’s linear & in what cases it’s over-determined & in what cases it’s a web & of what or what behind the web (and as a mode could I be good this way or could I be good another way or could I let you be me for a second so you could show me the ropes or could you let me in your shoes here for a moment so I have compassion for you or could you and I work together here for a second and to reshape one another with our essentiality so that we could establish flux between the self-existing and the merely-existing and allow the emanation to respond to the core with experimental results its actions [true/false/transcendent] while the core enlightens the emanation with its continued manifestations of self-existence) – I see this fashionable black woman rubbing lotion on her hands, and I say she smells tasty, and she asks "Do you want to eat me?" So I get out of class, it’s 10:25, my bus leaves, it’s a gorgeous summer night so I walk down the street. I keep hearing "Theirs not to make reply, theirs not to reason why, theirs but to do and die" – while professors leave the parking lot, one in a Beetle – and I keep merrily heading down the road, occasionally kissing a flower. I see the den of the enchanted she-spider hanging in the air between the trees. That den of the enchanted she-spider, thank the grounds of being for that, I can just get lost in those embraces and those enfoldments and that gentle caressing mist between trees seeking to shroud life with its delicacy and bring it into its complete resplendor. And all night long it’s something with "95" (year of the enchanting she-spider) it’s something with "56" (year of my muse) or the next number "57" (year of Sputnik in space – not coincidental) it’s something with "7:07" or "9:11" or all along the same line. I remember from previously: The movement outward is hardest from most closed-minded places and easiest from most open-minded. The worst ones are the hardest, while the better ones are freer because much of the work has been done for you. The places with greatest political and social obstacles are ones that have least to offer, and whose people have most legitimate reason to go somewhere else. The same is true for all propaganda, family-values, militaristic, religious, Marxist, feminist or any other: The less the place has to offer and the worse it is, the more propaganda and moral bludgeoning it requires. Which creates an inverse relationship between actual moral quality of the social order and amount of moralizing done by the social order. A social order that is most malignant is one that is most moralizing. The more malignant, the more moralizing; the more actually morally upstanding, the less propaganda and moralizing required. Which is the reason that moralizing societies lead to the worst abuses against people. Some think this is coincidental, I see direct and inevitable relationship. I see some toughs loitering outside King’s Pizza and wait at bus station, walking around the corner and stand at bus stop watching restorateurs leave in cabs, and here I am again in treespace while bus does not come and I keep walking. And there I run into the whole sociopath nonsense and say in response that that is a concept that underlies the economic system and political system and to apply it to Wollmann without applying it to Gates is despicable – and then I keep reiterating: What we have here is a science selling out to a political interest: adopting as health the interest of American middle class and its dogmas and pathologizing what speaks otherwise: That it speaks to American dogmas rather than Soviet ones does not make it any less of a manipulation: And that once again the perceived pathology includes everyone from Voltaire to Rockefeller, Carnegie and Wolfowitz onwards – and that the entire economic system is based upon it and yes Cujo that means you. And then I notice something more on this issue: Through manipulation of social climate and attitudes and actions and reactions pursuant those attitudes, consequences are assigned to actions that are not natural, but rather artificial & create an impression of good actions being bad and bad actions being good. We see that run through all societies and times. We have, for example, Pakis saying that romance is disastrous and proving it by killing those who fall in love. We have, for example, Cubans saying that business is antisocial and proving it by killing those who do business. The idea of God being through all things is used to excuse deliberate social manipulation, by modes and creators of modes, as though those were divinely ordained rather than manmade. The obvious problem is that substance may manifest through nodes, but nodes, involving choice, mean that they are not obligated to the ground of being but are as such nodes capable of deliberate choice, God-ordained or not! And then it is used to impose this order as though it was divine. Which requires calling the bluff. If God is through all things, in other words, then not only the order you create but the order I create is manifestation of God – as is the order created by any of your other enemies. So we have environmental science claim that environment exists according to its order, unless disturbed by man (devil #1). We have systems like Confucianism that claim society as a matter of social order having a place for everyone – place according to divine order – unless that order is disturbed by man’s ego (devil #2). We have economic science that has applied this to economic activity and said that all things are guided by "invisible hand" when in a "free-market" context, with everyone competing against everyone, unless disturbed by intellectually conceived and goal-directed political action (devil #3), even as this same science adopts will and ego and montarily defined self-interest (combination of devil #1 and devil #2) as basic concept of legitimate human interest and claims the competition within framework of law to be the natural order. After which we have the concept of intellectual-political action uniting people in what it believes to be intellectually right ideology; that seeks to educate people based on intellectual and philosophical ideas and shared interest (and which the economic mindset sees as meddling or evil or arrogance – the same way the social interest was to the economic mindset from the beginning – even as the media-intellectual-political ideas created anyway necessitate for the people to move toward a place of politics and philosophy and awareness of their civilization beyond the dogmas of laissez-faire and even to protect laissez-faire demand political and intellectual action on the part of the business class). In this political-intellectual order the devil (devil #4) is spirituality, which main proponents of this ideology see as being one or another form of mental malfunction – much like the capitalists think of the political-intellectual. Once that stops working, after many corpses and disfigurements, and people start realizing after collossal battling that, no, spiritual experience is real, the next step seeks to create an order of people united in their spiritual experience and loyal to their knowledge and conception of the divine. In that order, the devil #5 is attained will (the people familiar with the subject know what I’m talking about). In all cases, we see a concept of nature, then society, then economy, then intelligence, then spirituality, then attained will, being divine; which order in all cases starts through one or another stage of will-assertion. Each level considers itself divine – unless disturbed by the artifact of man’s deliberate act of choice and of will as it stands to disrupt these supposedly divine workings. And what each level fails to understand is that the case of something being divine does not make what goes to the next level less divine. Each of these deified orders
… read more »
Response:
Dear Ilya: Once again you prove a veritable plethorae of mental masturbations in your salutory responses to mental inclinations surrounding the nature of the human being.Specifically the mind ,and its ability to torment the body and soul which houses it.Yes you have a mind, quite sharp and intelligent, full of hyperbole., and yes even knowledge, in fact your concern and frustration confirm in you a humanity. But I will contest with you the notion that ROMANCE is a natural occurring condition.This is a farce my friend.Romance is the pen ultimate of societal conditioning.Romance is the GReat Delusion whch like a placebo, feeds the illiterate masses much as religion is the Opiate of those same masses. But there is an element of living which liberates individuals from the shackles of this unmitigating delerium.It is called the Fuck It Zone.Yes my friend, the fuck it zone.That place where you simply tire of the insanity and psychosis which impels you endlessly and hopelessly to attemtp to employ Reason over experience in order to assuage your own psyche. That you have failed is equally apparent in the unending diatribe of your conversation.The least shall become most,and the most shall become least.What does this inspire in you my friend?EQUALITY. Yes, that is what it says apparently so well hidden as to be undecipherable to tthe superior intellect of the educated mind.And perhaps it is this inability to conquer the simplicity of the fuck it zone which truly hampers you from abandoning yourr pathetic efforts to save the world and yourself from the obvious cyclone of mental information that consumes you. I too have wanted to take my cock into my hand ,and dream of a fuck that was true, to hold that pure essence of feminine gentility, and surrender to the epitome of human emotional release.But just like going on vacation ends with the return to our menial workaday existence in reality where bills and responsibilities await our responsible transactions. in order to maintain this existence to the best of our ability, so too the orgasm is finally acheived, and the dirty socks are placed in the laundry to be cleaned, once again.Once this ambition to be included by sheer mental ejaculations is achieved even if only in delusion and fantasy, the reality of gooey sperm runnig down your leg. or massing on your sock sticky on your palm must be faced, and unless you are a neanderthal, or simply too tired to face the next day, from all this physical exertion in thrashing your penis into ground oblivion, you must eventually pull the sock off your cock, and toss it in the dirty laundry. Now, had you done this my friend, you might enjoy a temporary respite from your minds inferno, desperately trying to make sense out of what is apparently irrelevant information concerning the universe of human existents.Fuck IT!Yes who gives a shit!No One cares as much as the liar, who has the most at stake in iterating and reiterating the position of defenses against these intrusions to his/her laizze affaire mental masturbations. If you are finished(which I doubt) but for the sake of argument I will assume} ,if you are finished ranting and raving about social orders and political conditions, religous ambiguity , and the nature of man according to such esteemed minds as are availing your espousals, then let me inform you, the answer to your accusations, the conclcusion to your diatribes, the solution to your questions, and the most important imperative etc. etal, i.e. of this dogma and convoluted torment of a restless cranium, is this. You, my friend according to my diagnosis based upon personal experience are in need of a good fucking, and that is too say, you need to grab your cock in your hand and imagine that illustrious magnificents which has been denied to you on account of the proportions with which you were genetically endowed.You claim LOve as the impetus and motivator of your epistle, but the love you espouse is like an empty gong!What really motivates you Ilya?My guess is slavery.You are enslaved to an ideal.An ideal which does not exist in heaven or hell, nor has it been created on earth. This ideal is a fabrication, based upon fairness and equality, two very human suppositions invented by society to enforce and coerce a willful manipulation of our primitive nature into an otherwise civilized condition. I share your pain Ilya.I too am the helpless prisoner of my own lackings.I too am the disease of my own making. And in response to these limitations, and failures, have also looked to God, and Reason to appease and alleviate my ravaged pschic conditions of pathetic circumstance. Yes it is true, in my quest for relief from abhorations of thought, the result of consideration, and such other notions, embryonically delivered to my own mental awareness by means of what media these societeies of humankind produce in past and present state of being here on thsi orb we call our home, Let me say this to you my friend.Let me say this: "Fuck shit piss nigger cunt faggot punk, motherfucker goddamned it to hell .Not only this, but while we are at it, cocksucker pedophile baby fucking shit eating dog fucking piece of shit.No? How about this then.Honky Bitch Punk sissy boy. or perhaps spic, wop, chink gook nip, prick, and opf course beneath all of this ,here I am, lunatic, embecile idiot, fuckwad dimwit stupid dumbshit . The catdog cattawampus motherfucking shave your butt and walk backwards cuntlicking faggot punk sissy bitch that I am. So you see my friend, I too have felt the fear and deciet of my ownmind, and felt the hatred and ignorance of my own conception of those anomolies.I have failed nad surrendered to the Devil, onl;y to fnd a trapped messiah, yearning for salvation, not for himself,but for the pathetic likes of me, a fellow prisoner captive to this cyclonic delusion of mortal fraility, and whta this discovery has awakened in me is response, and determination. These things of human will, these conditions of hopelessness and dewspair are not mediated, but rather conjoined with a greater condition of exasperation which is to say Comedy and yes, mercy, forgiveness and understanding, self soothing generation of introspection. and what is all this say to me? I’M Fucked! screwed blued and tattooed.~I’m in a world of shit, and yes, I am another turd in the bowl.a bowl that never flushes. but instead sits there and rots in its own putrid vomit and spew.and it stinks.It smells to high heavens Ilya.This is Salvation my friend, for it is here in the sewer of human conditions where honesty can finally be approached, and yes the Grace of God is found finally. For after resolving to forgive myself, and having realized the unpardonable error of my own mind, I am in a position to forgive and understand others more generously.This is that point of creation where the creator having testified to my own inadequacies simply chooses to shut up,and allow the truth to speak ofr itself for once, and we shall see what we shall see. So Ilya, my friend, peace be with you, that peace which exceeds all human capacity to comprehend.May mercy find you within,and shine forth dimly towards your environment that you might finally discover the gentle reflection of community which surrounds and embraces you with the same condition, That imho is love, or what humanity has thus far made of this romantic notion invented or realized by civilized effort, and without this we have paradise, whichis our previous estate of being before creation played th grand trick upon human kind of sharing the burden of maintenance and realization with our kind. It is only fair that we, should suffer for so great is the reward of our comprehensions, that suffring becomes a gracious annullment of our inconcievable debt to creation.this then is that mercy from the Garden of Edenic youth from which we transpired unto our current state of stupidity. Peace and Love hugs and kisses too, oh lord don’t let me be misunderstood.and thank God for the selfless sacrifices of those whom have gone before to attain this simple model of actuation, yes, for want of an identifieing concern, in Jesus name, ha ha,,ha,, and it is this Jesus universal Buddha incarnate, that diminishes of tyrant God to brotherly traveler to whom I speak, much as I would speak to you,for friends can get away with things that enemies could never achieve.That is the great gift of mutual respect which the Golden Rule instills in us one at a time from age to age learned by experience, awakened awaiting mistress of the night. Hail Mary full of grace, Dos duh Vedanya.
Response:
So Mr. Bat had a fine ole night hooting with the owls! And not only the owls, but the howls. The owls make the howls and the howls make the owls and over the backbone of the H they form a mirror image of each other. As in, eviLive. It’s been a fine night for Mr. Bat, out on the streets of Alexandria. First I read Mr. Khodorkovsky’s epistle from the jail: "True freedom is within," "a result of pursuing one’s principles" – and of course the main question to ask is, "Are your principles truly yours?" And then, "By what authority?" And then, "After what process?" And finally, "To what extent true?" (and of course the idea that transitional stuff is destructive: No, you first reject what you don’t like, then you figure out what you do like and affirm it). (and the correlated concept of self-awareness: Self-awareness in terms of a false set of beliefs is wrong and can only be done in terms of true beliefs) (and the corollary concept of taking responsibility for one’s life: That only becomes possible truly when you’ve studied and experienced and have an informed knowledge of what you truly want: all else leads to wasted lives). After philosophy class (continuing education program) at the community college, in which was discussed Spinosa’s concept of God being self-existing manifesting through all people who are modes (and it is the purpose of the mode, I presume, to refract the light until it creates a picture that is most appealing, with each mode shaped by substance & reshaping substance and self and – hey, Mr. Self-existing One, could you please notice me and what I’ve done with your substance (oh and tell me the true causes of things, in what cases it’s linear & in what cases it’s over-determined & in what cases it’s a web & of what or what behind the web (and as a mode could I be good this way or could I be good another way or could I let you be me for a second so you could show me the ropes or could you let me in your shoes here for a moment so I have compassion for you or could you and I work together here for a second and to reshape one another with our essentiality so that we could establish flux between the self-existing and the merely-existing and allow the emanation to respond to the core with experimental results its actions [true/false/transcendent] while the core enlightens the emanation with its continued manifestations of self-existence) – I see this fashionable black woman rubbing lotion on her hands, and I say she smells tasty, and she asks "Do you want to eat me?" So I get out of class, it’s 10:25, my bus leaves, it’s a gorgeous summer night so I walk down the street. I keep hearing "Theirs not to make reply, theirs not to reason why, theirs but to do and die" – while professors leave the parking lot, one in a Beetle – and I keep merrily heading down the road, occasionally kissing a flower. I see the den of the enchanted she-spider hanging in the air between the trees. That den of the enchanted she-spider, thank the grounds of being for that, I can just get lost in those embraces and those enfoldments and that gentle caressing mist between trees seeking to shroud life with its delicacy and bring it into its complete resplendor. And all night long it’s something with "95" (year of the enchanting she-spider) it’s something with "56" (year of my muse) or the next number "57" (year of Sputnik in space – not coincidental) it’s something with "7:07" or "9:11" or all along the same line. I remember from previously: The movement outward is hardest from most closed-minded places and easiest from most open-minded. The worst ones are the hardest, while the better ones are freer because much of the work has been done for you. The places with greatest political and social obstacles are ones that have least to offer, and whose people have most legitimate reason to go somewhere else. The same is true for all propaganda, family-values, militaristic, religious, Marxist, feminist or any other: The less the place has to offer and the worse it is, the more propaganda and moral bludgeoning it requires. Which creates an inverse relationship between actual moral quality of the social order and amount of moralizing done by the social order. A social order that is most malignant is one that is most moralizing. The more malignant, the more moralizing; the more actually morally upstanding, the less propaganda and moralizing required. Which is the reason that moralizing societies lead to the worst abuses against people. Some think this is coincidental, I see direct and inevitable relationship. I see some toughs loitering outside King’s Pizza and wait at bus station, walking around the corner and stand at bus stop watching restorateurs leave in cabs, and here I am again in treespace while bus does not come and I keep walking. And there I run into the whole sociopath nonsense and say in response that that is a concept that underlies the economic system and political system and to apply it to Wollmann without applying it to Gates is despicable – and then I keep reiterating: What we have here is a science selling out to a political interest: adopting as health the interest of American middle class and its dogmas and pathologizing what speaks otherwise: That it speaks to American dogmas rather than Soviet ones does not make it any less of a manipulation: And that once again the perceived pathology includes everyone from Voltaire to Rockefeller, Carnegie and Wolfowitz onwards – and that the entire economic system is based upon it and yes Cujo that means you. And then I notice something more on this issue: Through manipulation of social climate and attitudes and actions and reactions pursuant those attitudes, consequences are assigned to actions that are not natural, but rather artificial & create an impression of good actions being bad and bad actions being good. We see that run through all societies and times. We have, for example, Pakis saying that romance is disastrous and proving it by killing those who fall in love. We have, for example, Cubans saying that business is antisocial and proving it by killing those who do business. The idea of God being through all things is used to excuse deliberate social manipulation, by modes and creators of modes, as though those were divinely ordained rather than manmade. The obvious problem is that substance may manifest through nodes, but nodes, involving choice, mean that they are not obligated to the ground of being but are as such nodes capable of deliberate choice, God-ordained or not! And then it is used to impose this order as though it was divine. Which requires calling the bluff. If God is through all things, in other words, then not only the order you create but the order I create is manifestation of God – as is the order created by any of your other enemies. So we have environmental science claim that environment exists according to its order, unless disturbed by man (devil #1). We have systems like Confucianism that claim society as a matter of social order having a place for everyone – place according to divine order – unless that order is disturbed by man’s ego (devil #2). We have economic science that has applied this to economic activity and said that all things are guided by "invisible hand" when in a "free-market" context, with everyone competing against everyone, unless disturbed by intellectually conceived and goal-directed political action (devil #3), even as this same science adopts will and ego and montarily defined self-interest (combination of devil #1 and devil #2) as basic concept of legitimate human interest and claims the competition within framework of law to be the natural order. After which we have the concept of intellectual-political action uniting people in what it believes to be intellectually right ideology; that seeks to educate people based on intellectual and philosophical ideas and shared interest (and which the economic mindset sees as meddling or evil or arrogance – the same way the social interest was to the economic mindset from the beginning – even as the media-intellectual-political ideas created anyway necessitate for the people to move toward a place of politics and philosophy and awareness of their civilization beyond the dogmas of laissez-faire and even to protect laissez-faire demand political and intellectual action on the part of the business class). In this political-intellectual order the devil (devil #4) is spirituality, which main proponents of this ideology see as being one or another form of mental malfunction – much like the capitalists think of the political-intellectual. Once that stops working, after many corpses and disfigurements, and people start realizing after collossal battling that, no, spiritual experience is real, the next step seeks to create an order of people united in their spiritual experience and loyal to their knowledge and conception of the divine. In that order, the devil #5 is attained will (the people familiar with the subject know what I’m talking about). In all cases, we see a concept of nature, then society, then economy, then intelligence, then spirituality, then attained will, being divine; which order in all cases starts through one or another stage of will-assertion. Each level considers itself divine – unless disturbed by the artifact of man’s deliberate act of choice and of will as it stands to disrupt these supposedly divine workings. And what each level fails to understand is that the case of something being divine does not make what goes to the next level less divine. Each of these deified orders regard the next one as being demonic in origin. It refers to it as one or another form of hubris, without realising that according to a previous order it itself has been regarded as hubris, and that what works is for gradations of hubris to build on itself! We have Dan Mocnsny here, an evolutionist, saying that the problem with the world is that "freaks won’t … read more »
Response:
Question:
Poetry. vs. Paul. AWARDS. Pope Daniel Urtiz "Know thyself." — Socrates.
Response:
The Pope is a vital figure of Machista politics. Taoist and feminist philosophies are not welcome in New Hawaii. The cops and other so-called gentleman need to be killed, so I can kill my mother and leave West Palm Beach. Pope Daniel Urtiz "Know thyself." — Socrates.
Response:
Question:
Well, I live alone, so if I don’t do it nobody else will.
But no-one else will see it so it doesn’t matter! <g And I can’t really blame anyone else for the piles of books and papers.
Well, yes, that’s the downside, I admit… Yesterday I emptied a bookcase and two smallish tables of all their books and papers, cleaned everything, vacuumed my bed and mattress, damp mopped that area of the hard wood floor and put the furniture back.
I need to have a little lie down after reading that. I had so many things in the bookcase that weren’t books (greeting cards, maps, etc) that when I put only the books back I found I have an extra shelf.
So what have you done with those things? This is my "comfort reading" bookcase. Jane Austen, LM Montgomery, Mary Stewart, Josephine Tey, Daddy-Long-Legs, Louisa Alcott, Harry Potter, Dodie Smith. Plus a couple of books I read when I just can’t go to sleep. Fowler’s "Modern Engish Usage" and Wilson’s "What Happened in Hamlet" or a good sonnet usually put me to sleep within a page.
I listen to BBC World Service. As soon as something interesting comes on I zonk out. Now I’m trying to decide whether to clean out the piles of books and paper I moved to the living room floor yesterday, or clean my computer area and big work table, which will add much more stuff to the living room floor. What to do, what to do?
Have another ice-cream. The stuff will still be there when you’ve finished. In fact have another, you’ll have double inspiration. And have one for me. Mary – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Marilyn RIP Christopher Fry. "What, after all, is a halo? It’s only one more thing to keep clean." Christopher Fry
Response:
i’m still lurking around too… it’s been a while, though. nice to see you all again. -christina
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – … why it’s so quite round here … Mary
Response:
Hi Mary, I’m here too! I’m the boring old American!
American yes. Boring? Never. Mary – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Barb
Response:
Because I spent the day cleaning my kitchen and entry instead of posting? Marilyn Marilyn, what are you doing with all that house cleaning? That’s "Man’s" work! Didn’t we have a Civil War or something to free women from housecleaning? Well, in my house we have a War if "I" am expected to do it all alone. Women have babies and men cook and clean.
NONONONO! I cook. I like cooking. I LOVE cooking. I do it better than him. He’s no more than adequate. He does a lot of the cleaning and all the techie stuff (why keep a dog and bark yourself?) It’s only the Fr*nch who have men to cook. I think it’s one of the great doctrines. You gals are setting womenkind back 200 years with your housecleaning!<g
Well I’m not going to eat pizza every day to prove a feminist point. Pah. Mary – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Bea
Response:
Would you like to have a beagle puppy, or two, or three? Barb – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Thank you. I’m even inspiring myself lately. I live next door to a Beagle named Spencer. Very cute, but can’t be trusted off the leash. Their other dog is a dalmation, who needs to be in therapy. He has to be sedated to go to the vet. They were both rescue dogs so I’m sure their puppyhoods weren’t too pleasant. Marilyn
Response:
Because I spent the day cleaning my kitchen and entry instead of posting? Marilyn Marilyn, what are you doing with all that house cleaning? That’s "Man’s" work! Didn’t we have a Civil War or something to free women from housecleaning? Well, in my house we have a War if "I" am expected to do it all alone. Women have babies and men cook and clean. I think it’s one of the great doctrines. You gals are setting womenkind back 200 years with your housecleaning!<g Bea
Well, I live alone, so if I don’t do it nobody else will. <g And I can’t really blame anyone else for the piles of books and papers. Yesterday I emptied a bookcase and two smallish tables of all their books and papers, cleaned everything, vacuumed my bed and mattress, damp mopped that area of the hard wood floor and put the furniture back. I had so many things in the bookcase that weren’t books (greeting cards, maps, etc) that when I put only the books back I found I have an extra shelf. This is my "comfort reading" bookcase. Jane Austen, LM Montgomery, Mary Stewart, Josephine Tey, Daddy-Long-Legs, Louisa Alcott, Harry Potter, Dodie Smith. Plus a couple of books I read when I just can’t go to sleep. Fowler’s "Modern Engish Usage" and Wilson’s "What Happened in Hamlet" or a good sonnet usually put me to sleep within a page. Now I’m trying to decide whether to clean out the piles of books and paper I moved to the living room floor yesterday, or clean my computer area and big work table, which will add much more stuff to the living room floor. What to do, what to do? Marilyn RIP Christopher Fry. "What, after all, is a halo? It’s only one more thing to keep clean." Christopher Fry
Response:
Hi Mary, I’m here too! I’m the boring old American! Barb
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Hi Marilyn, I put off real cleaning all during the school year and then have no excuse not to do it when I’m on break from school. Well, this year I’ve goofed off for almost a month and haven’t tackled a thing…..Going on vacation to Charleston, South Carolina tomorrow and will be gone for 12 days……When I get home, I’ll HAVE to get busy. Actually, I have tackled one thing…….The only bedroom to get cleaned here got cleaned last weekend when my son’s beagle gave birth to 10 puppies on my guest room bed! This whole whelping thing was new to all of us and we didn’t read her "signals" very well. By the time we located her the birthing had begun!! We now call the mom, Queen Lucy of the Battenburg Lace Pillow Sham 
The pups are adorable and everything cleaned up beautifully. Marilyn, you’ve been my inspiration (after I get done vacationing)! Barb
Thank you. I’m even inspiring myself lately. I live next door to a Beagle named Spencer. Very cute, but can’t be trusted off the leash. Their other dog is a dalmation, who needs to be in therapy. He has to be sedated to go to the vet. They were both rescue dogs so I’m sure their puppyhoods weren’t too pleasant. Marilyn
Response:
Because I spent the day cleaning my kitchen and entry instead of posting? Marilyn
Marilyn, what are you doing with all that house cleaning? That’s "Man’s" work! Didn’t we have a Civil War or something to free women from housecleaning? Well, in my house we have a War if "I" am expected to do it all alone. Women have babies and men cook and clean. I think it’s one of the great doctrines. You gals are setting womenkind back 200 years with your housecleaning!<g Bea
Response:
Because I spent the day cleaning my kitchen and entry instead of posting? Show off! Nyer nyer … Mary
Now I’m sitting in the last room I need to clean before I start the basement. This is my bedroom, den, book and DVD room. Sigh. Why didn’t I start with this room? Books everywhere, hundreds of them, clothes piled up, papers everywhere. I think I’ll have some Breyer’s lo-carb chocolate ice cream to cheer myself up. And then maybe I’ll water the garden. By then maybe it will be too late to clean anything. I’ve given myself a week to bulldoze out this room and paint my kitchen cupboards and walls. Or else. Marilyn
Response:
Hi Marilyn, I put off real cleaning all during the school year and then have no excuse not to do it when I’m on break from school. Well, this year I’ve goofed off for almost a month and haven’t tackled a thing…..Going on vacation to Charleston, South Carolina tomorrow and will be gone for 12 days……When I get home, I’ll HAVE to get busy. Actually, I have tackled one thing…….The only bedroom to get cleaned here got cleaned last weekend when my son’s beagle gave birth to 10 puppies on my guest room bed! This whole whelping thing was new to all of us and we didn’t read her "signals" very well. By the time we located her the birthing had begun!! We now call the mom, Queen Lucy of the Battenburg Lace Pillow Sham The pups are adorable and everything cleaned up beautifully. Marilyn, you’ve been my inspiration (after I get done vacationing)! Barb – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Because I spent the day cleaning my kitchen and entry instead of posting? Show off! Nyer nyer … Mary Now I’m sitting in the last room I need to clean before I start the basement. This is my bedroom, den, book and DVD room. Sigh. Why didn’t I start with this room? Books everywhere, hundreds of them, clothes piled up, papers everywhere. I think I’ll have some Breyer’s lo-carb chocolate ice cream to cheer myself up. And then maybe I’ll water the garden. By then maybe it will be too late to clean anything. I’ve given myself a week to bulldoze out this room and paint my kitchen cupboards and walls. Or else. Marilyn
Response:
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Because I spent the day cleaning my kitchen and entry instead of posting? Show off! Nyer nyer … Mary Now I’m sitting in the last room I need to clean before I start the basement. This is my bedroom, den, book and DVD room. Sigh. Why didn’t I start with this room? Books everywhere, hundreds of them, clothes piled up, papers everywhere.
That’s why I think I’ll have some Breyer’s lo-carb chocolate ice cream to cheer myself up.
Good idea. And then maybe I’ll water the garden. By then maybe it will be too late to clean anything.
Excellent idea. Mustn’t let the plants suffer I’ve given myself a week to bulldoze out this room and paint my kitchen cupboards and walls.
Hmm. Best of luck Mary – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Or else. Marilyn
Response:
… why it’s so quite round here … Mary Because I spent the day cleaning my kitchen and entry instead of posting?
Show off! Nyer nyer … Mary – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Marilyn
Response:
… why it’s so quite round here … Mary
Response:
… why it’s so quite round here … Mary
Because I spent the day cleaning my kitchen and entry instead of posting? Marilyn
Response:
why it’s so quite round here … Mary
Why?? Is this vacation season in the UK? In the US we prefer to stay stressed out and avoid vacations. But there are people posting today, Mary. Haven’t you noticed? Kay and I are here and now so are you. Kay’s post about her bone scan was so scary, I ran and cancelled the one I had set for this Thursday. I go to one of those Diagnostic places where they love to see all sorts of shadows and make you return for more tests. I am not going through what they put Kay through! Anyway, my Onc did not say I had to have it. My bored Orthopedic doc decided he would like to see a scan of my bones. He can just wait until I kick off and I’ll will him my corpse! Only joking! (I think.) Have a nice day just don’t go on a vacation. Bea
Response:
why it’s so quite round here … Mary Why?? Is this vacation season in the UK?
No – but it might be for some across the pond:-) In the US we prefer to stay stressed out and avoid vacations. But there are people posting today, Mary. Haven’t you noticed? Kay and I are here and now so are you.
Two of … how many others? I don’t count, being a boring old Englishwoman! Kay’s post about her bone scan was so scary, I ran and cancelled the one I had set for this Thursday.
Oh, that’s a shame. It could be likened to not going to any doctor because you’ve been warned off in someone else’s posts … scans are very useful tools. I go to one of those Diagnostic places where they love to see all sorts of shadows and make you return for more tests. I am not going through what they put Kay through! Anyway, my Onc did not say I had to have it. My bored Orthopedic doc decided he would like to see a scan of my bones. He can just wait until I kick off and I’ll will him my corpse! Only joking! (I think.)
He could have mine – as long as he paid for the shipping. Have a nice day just don’t go on a vacation.
I’ve had to charge on the wax melter – customers suddenly want candles. In July!!! There’s nowt so queer as folks! But we don’t have holidays – vacations. Life is one Big Holiday for theFishers Mary – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Bea
Response:
Next page
Previous page