Activism Change

hide and peek

Question:

>Which ASS poster would you like to see a picture of added to the >gallery the >most? >Just wondering. >For me, it’s M78.

Fugly.net.  Pic somewhere on there Enjoy. Also, that site as some major bad ass high quality yo mamma humor (well, I’m not sure it could be called yo mamma’s humor I dunno how to call it) Example, http://www.fugly.net/g5/0640.html or  http://www.fugly.net/g4/3848.html — Direct access to this group with http://web2news.com http://web2news.com/?alt.support.shyness

Response:

"mathieu78" <mathieu78.news.inva…@web2news.net> wrote: > Fugly.net.  Pic somewhere on there

What, I’m just supposed to guess which is you? I can do that now. How about a little hint?

Response:

"mathieu78" <mathieu78.news.inva…@web2news.net> wrote in message

<news:28384N530@web2news.com>… > Fugly.net.  Pic somewhere on there > Enjoy. > Also, that site as some major bad ass high quality yo mamma > humor (well, I’m not sure it could be called yo mamma’s humor > I dunno how to call it) > Example, http://www.fugly.net/g5/0640.html > or  http://www.fugly.net/g4/3848.html

I looked at a lot of the pictures there and many of them make no sense to me at all. Is this guy really trying very hard to get pictures of ugly people? I don’t think he is, because I can walk into any large indoor mall and see examples worse than almost anything at this site within 20 seconds. Also, some of his choices make no sense at all, unless he’s trying to get revenge on some people for some reason. For example, beginning with the two web pages you supplied —-> 1. http://www.fugly.net/g5/0640.html    Except for needing braces, what’s wrong with her? 2. http://www.fugly.net/g4/3848.html    Except for the guy with the strange glasses and goofy beard,    I don’t understand what’s wrong with any of these guys. They    all seem at least average looking to me, and they’d be well    above average looking in many places (for example, in a grocery    store in a low income area). 3. http://www.fugly.net/g6/2315.html    The guy is a bit nerdy looking, but the girl is totally cute.    His comments about this couple just don’t make any sense to me. 4. http://www.fugly.net/g5/9m02.html    I don’t get it. She’s beautiful. 5. http://www.fugly.net/g4/7120.html    http://www.fugly.net/g3/0304.html    http://www.fugly.net/g3/2225.html    http://www.fugly.net/g1/2222.html    None of these four girls are really my type (see [1]),    but what’s wrong with any of them?    [1] This doesn’t mean that I wouldn’t ask any of them out        if I were single, but it does mean that I doubt I’d        approach any of them unless I knew they were available,        because they’re sufficiently attractive that I wouldn’t        expect them to be available. Of course, if they were in        a field such as math or physics, I would be extremely        interested, but I’d probably be a lot more hesitant to        approach them since so many other guys would be after        them as well. ["Female engineers become irresistible        at the age of consent and remain that way until about        thirty minutes after their clinical death. Longer if        it's a warm day." -- p. 180 of Scott Adams' book "The        Dilbert Principle".] The comments at this site can be funny if you like this type of humor, but a lot of his examples simply don’t fit the things he says about them. It’s looks as if he writes an essay that he thinks is funny and then goes looking on the internet for a picture that fits what he’s written. But he often doesn’t find a very good match. Virgo Cluster   "[10 Most Bungled Executions] (#1) The most prolonged execution    in French history occurred in 1626, when Count Henri de Chalais    was condemned to death for his part in a royal assassination    plot. When it was time for the court to be publicly beheaded    with a sward, the regular executioner couldn’t be found and    an inexperienced replacement had to be drafted in at the last    minute. The count’s head was hacked off by the stand-in on the    29′th stroke: he was still breathing at the 20′th." << Karl Shaw, "The Mammoth Book of Tasteless    Lists", Carroll & Graf Publishers, 1998, p. 364 >>

Response:

"Virgo Cluster" <gamma_n…@yahoo.com> wrote in message

news:dd95baf2.0305040738.3a724225@posting.google.com… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> "mathieu78" <mathieu78.news.inva…@web2news.net> wrote in message > <news:28384N530@web2news.com>… > > Fugly.net.  Pic somewhere on there > > Enjoy. > > Also, that site as some major bad ass high quality yo mamma > > humor (well, I’m not sure it could be called yo mamma’s humor > > I dunno how to call it) > > Example, http://www.fugly.net/g5/0640.html > > or  http://www.fugly.net/g4/3848.html > I looked at a lot of the pictures there and many of them make > no sense to me at all.

Yo virgo, Been meaning to post this,actually I did post it yesterday, but it seem the webservice "web2news" isn’t 100% reliable so it here is "again": —- Btw virgo, how would you like to have your pug mug digitally eternalized for future’s generation’s enjoyment? I mean, c’mon.. half of these people are better looking than you? —- > Is this guy really trying very hard > to get pictures of ugly people? I don’t think he is, because > I can walk into any large indoor mall and see examples worse > than almost anything at this site within 20 seconds. Also, > some of his choices make no sense at all, unless he’s trying > to get revenge on some people for some reason. For example, > beginning with the two web pages you supplied —-> > 1. http://www.fugly.net/g5/0640.html >    Except for needing braces, what’s wrong with her?

Nothing, if you don’t mind making out with very lq females. Aside from her serious dental/jaw anomaly, she’s not very attractive, I think that’s evident (but then, it’s you) > 2. http://www.fugly.net/g4/3848.html

Ugly,ugly,ugly,ugly and…ugly. They’re dorks. Unmasculine,unaverage,unsymmetrical…dorks ya know. And they’re all better looking than you. >    Except for the guy with the strange glasses and goofy beard, >    I don’t understand what’s wrong with any of these guys. They >    all seem at least average looking to me, and they’d be well >    above average looking in many places (for example, in a grocery >    store in a low income area). > 3. http://www.fugly.net/g6/2315.html >    The guy is a bit nerdy looking, but the girl is totally cute. >    His comments about this couple just don’t make any sense to me.

But then, you have a very special mind. Look, if you are to take your wife as a point of reference then…of course, she’s won’t seem ugly. But we’re talking compared to the average of the population..Not compared to your wife,not compared to your family..The a-ve-ra-ge of the po-pu-la-tion. *Damn* this guy is weird. > 4. http://www.fugly.net/g5/9m02.html >    I don’t get it. She’s beautiful.

No actually, but I’m sure she’s light years ahead of your wife fwiw.

Response:

"Asstagon" <a…@aracnet.com> wrote in message

news:b92lc812m8r@enews3.newsguy.com… > "mathieu78" <mathieu78.news.inva…@web2news.net> wrote: > > Fugly.net.  Pic somewhere on there > What, I’m just supposed to guess which is you? > I can do that now. > How about a little hint?

Actually, I’m not on that site. Just a way to tell you, if you want to ‘peek’ at some ugly mugs, there are websites for that.

Response:

"mathieu78" <nom…@n.com> wrote in message

news:1052285209.201386@www.vif.com… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> "Virgo Cluster" <gamma_n…@yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:dd95baf2.0305040738.3a724225@posting.google.com… > > "mathieu78" <mathieu78.news.inva…@web2news.net> wrote in message > > <news:28384N530@web2news.com>… > > > Fugly.net.  Pic somewhere on there > > > Enjoy. > > > Also, that site as some major bad ass high quality yo mamma > > > humor (well, I’m not sure it could be called yo mamma’s humor > > > I dunno how to call it) > > > Example, http://www.fugly.net/g5/0640.html > > > or  http://www.fugly.net/g4/3848.html > > I looked at a lot of the pictures there and many of them make > > no sense to me at all. > Yo virgo, Been meaning to post this,actually I did post it yesterday, but it > seem the webservice "web2news" isn’t 100% reliable so it here is "again": > —- > Btw virgo, how would you like to have your pug mug digitally eternalized for > future’s generation’s enjoyment? > I mean, c’mon.. half of these people are better looking than you? > —-

Ok, I don’t have any real intentions to "submit" your pic. I don’t even think you would care actually.

Response:

"mathieu78" <nom…@n.com> wrote in message

<news:1052285209.201386@www.vif.com>… > They’re dorks. Unmasculine,unaverage,unsymmetrical…dorks > ya know. And they’re all better looking than you.

Well, a guess one positive thing about this is that I don’t have to worry about whether others will think I’m making up stuff or that it’s all in my head when I post about my past experiences, as is sometimes the case with Animeg3282, trance909, or Darkfalz. Virgo Cluster   "[10 Most Bungled Executions] (#9) The electrocution of John Evans    in Alabama state prison in 1983 required three surges of 1900    volts each over a period of 14 minutes to finish him off. Eye    witnesses related that they saw Evans struggling for breath as    smoke began to pour from the electrodes on his head and one of    his legs. The autopsy on Evans’s body revealed that he had    endured fourth- and second-degree burns while he was still alive." << Karl Shaw, "The Mammoth Book of Tasteless    Lists", Carroll & Graf Publishers, 1998, p. 366 >>

Response:

> Example, http://www.fugly.net/g5/0640.html > or  http://www.fugly.net/g4/3848.html

Hm..here’s another good one: —– There’s a certain, subtle irony in gender politics – maybe it’s not so subtle: women who look like this campaign fervently against being viewed as "sex objects." …As if any of them really have to worry about that. Oops – pardon me – I said "women" when referring to bob-haired, dead-butch feminist types. It’s supposed to be womyn or wimmin or whatever the preferred spelling happens to be this week. The word "woman" is considered objectionable because it has a "man" in it. …As if any of them really have to worry about that. Of course, there’s no "men" in "sanctimonious middle-aged bog-trolls" either, or "sexless simian attention-freaks" for that matter. Why, there are dozens of fitting phrases that aptly describe the nuggets of the feminist movement without any reference to gender at all. I do believe they spend far too much effort laboring over what men should call them, especially when they don’t want men to call them at all. …As if any of them really have to worry about that. — I think virgo is right,though… I looks like these where "essay" taking somewhere on the net and they just stick the photo next to it. And sometimes,yes, the people that figured on the photo are ust plain normal,average looking. Still, this text is pretty good in it’s own right.

Response:

> I looks like these where

It look like these were.

Response:

Filed under: Feminist

Related Posts

• Gyne visits
• Happy Birthday--Kathleen of Bikini Kill!!
• what does being feminine mean to you-slightly OT
• Kurt Cobain
• Kidnappings, Rape, and Torture Reported in Kabul
• Bad Faith at Justice
• Wicca and Homosexuality
• Any comments on New Winds or Arcturus!
• Political Correctness & Norman
• Bob think Bush wuss sell Republican party to sick democratic national committee finance people