An observation
Question:
Kevin Rohleder <kev…@nospamwpi.edu> wrote in message
news:3bc92123.946733342@news.speakeasy.net… > I picked up a magic 8-ball the other day. It said "Outlook Not So > Good". I said, "Sure, but Microsoft still ships it." > -k
*Shakes his head.* – Patrick Stewart
Response:
Hello T.S., (T.S.) writes >’ll pretend as if I never read it. Except for the last sentence. Hope you >don’t mind. 
Just from my own personal experience, I find it is often better >to look forward rather than backward. >T.S. (Marty) writes:
I’ve discovered that looking backward can be beneficial when I’m doing it for the purpose of learning something from the past. But when I find myself ruminating over some mistake or bad experience with no intention of using it for leverage then I’ve wasted time and energy that could have been put to much better use. Looking forward is energizing to me when I do it with an optimistic attitude. However, looking forward through a pessimistic lens can be quite frightening. For me, it’s all about attitude. Just my 2 farthings , Marty =============================================== Mistakes are made for learning and improving, not for repeating. — Denis Waitley ===============================================
Response:
On 13 Oct 2001 11:30:18 -0700, maddman…@yahoo.com (maddman) wrote: >Mike G <m.a.gor…@ncl.ac.uk> wrote in message <news:mnjgstchqum3ff871r47uc3gh34b0qs8c3@4ax.com>… >> On Sat, 13 Oct 2001 08:15:57 -0400, "lm" <lmandtheb…@msn.com> wrote: >> >I’d appreciate it if everyone ignored that. It was sent here by mistake. >> >Thanks. >> Let me guess… Outlook Express >Friends don’t let friends use microsoft
I picked up a magic 8-ball the other day. It said "Outlook Not So Good". I said, "Sure, but Microsoft still ships it." -k
Response:
On Sat, 13 Oct 2001 08:15:57 -0400, "lm" <lmandtheb…@msn.com> wrote: >I’d appreciate it if everyone ignored that. It was sent here by mistake. >Thanks.
Let me guess… Outlook Express — Mike
Response:
lm wrote: > I’d appreciate it if everyone ignored that. It was sent here by mistake. > Thanks.
If more people sent things here by mistake, it would liven up the ng. EM
Response:
Mike G <m.a.gor…@ncl.ac.uk> wrote in message <news:mnjgstchqum3ff871r47uc3gh34b0qs8c3@4ax.com>… > On Sat, 13 Oct 2001 08:15:57 -0400, "lm" <lmandtheb…@msn.com> wrote: > >I’d appreciate it if everyone ignored that. It was sent here by mistake. > >Thanks. > Let me guess… Outlook Express
Friends don’t let friends use microsoft
Response:
"lm" <lmandtheb…@msn.com> wrote: >I’d appreciate it if everyone ignored that. It was sent here by mistake. >Thanks.
Sorry, but I read it before I read this post telling me to ignore it. FWIW, I can identify with the sentiments expressed. ;-) — Bastian
Response:
"lm" <lmandtheb…@msn.com> wrote in article <#sO0q$9UBHA.2188@cpimsnntpa02>: > I’d appreciate it if everyone ignored that. It was sent here by mistake. > Thanks.
I’ll pretend as if I never read it. Except for the last sentence. Hope you don’t mind. Just from my own personal experience, I find it is often better to look forward rather than backward. T.S.
Response:
In the past when you and I talked on the phone, I would sometimes think afterward about what I should have said or not said, or about how I should have said something. These days, when something happens as I go about my business in the real world, I sometimes think about it in terms of whether you would be interested in hearing about it the next time we talk on the phone. It’s a nice change, looking forward rather than backward. Laura
Response:
I’d appreciate it if everyone ignored that. It was sent here by mistake. Thanks. lm
Response:
>Have you read this book? If not, I’d suggest you >shut up and leave it to the experts of which you >certainly don’t belong among…
I read about half of it. Knowing very little about the Jewish people, yet hearing "Jewish conspiracy!" all the time from American media, I was curious as to what all the fuss was about. It seemed the book was tailored for people who had already made up their mind about jews. It made a hell of a lot of assumptions (that jews are dishonest by nature etc) and would make wholly unscientific statements like "it is obvious that the jews are <blank>". Coming from a rather neutral position about the Jewish faith (I don’t even know if I’ve even met any Jews) the book seemed a bit overblown and sinister, almost laughably so. It also assumed that everything associated with the "left" is evil and wholly destructive for society, which I don’t agree with. Of course if I’d read a number of pro-Jew books by various political and sociology experts you probably wouldn’t consider me informed, would you? >Start out with Viacom which owns MTV, it is >headed by the JEW Sumner Redstone..try showing me >how that’s an opinion????
It’s a fact that a lot of media corporations are owned by Jews, but it’s an opinion that their religion affects programming or that Jews are working in collusion.
Response:
Jim Winters wrote: > I was sitting 50 feet away from him tonight while he gave a speech. He > came off as very arrogant and hate-filled. He called Christopher > Hitchens "rancid and foul". I’ll bet Hitchens doesn’t use that type of > invective against Galloway behind HIS back.
Hitchens is a pretty nasty piece of work too. Try reading some of his stuff – if you can stomach it. He’s also a nutty bonkers conspiracy theorist who thinks the Devil lives in Hampstead and rules Europe. MC
Response:
>An observation
by "Jim Winters" <extremereactionfo…@yahoo.com> Sep 16, 2005 at 06:51 PM >George Galloway deserves to be raped.
I have a better observation, Jim Winters is a Jew-Lover and deserves to be raped. Apparently he thinks it is cool if Jews destroy the White race with multiculturalism and Feminist poison. Simon Weaselthal was a Commie pig and only a little uninformed PUKE like you who has never studied the Jewish question would admire someone like that. Try getting informed: http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0759672229/qid=11272641… Either get informed or shut the fuck up. I’m sick and tired of you little nothings who haven’t read a single book about Jewish power and yet you sit there and play the fake "expert"..you prove to me that you’ve studied the issue or take a fucking seat next to the other idiotic little girls…
Response:
>Either get informed or shut the fuck up. I’m sick >and tired of you little nothings who haven’t read a >single book about Jewish power and yet you sit >there and play the fake "expert"
That’s the problem with buying into a conspiracy theory so absolutely… there’s no such thing as a difference of opinion. It’s either "enlightened" or "brainwashed".
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -JimSummers wrote: > >An observation > by "Jim Winters" <extremereactionfo…@yahoo.com> Sep 16, 2005 at 06:51 > PM > >George Galloway deserves to be raped. > I have a better observation, Jim Winters is a Jew-Lover and deserves to > be raped. Apparently he thinks it is cool if Jews destroy the White race > with multiculturalism and Feminist poison. Simon Weaselthal was a Commie > pig and only a little uninformed PUKE like you who has never studied the > Jewish question would admire someone like that. > Try getting informed:
Thanks, but I’ve already read C of C. I’ve also read "The Turner Diaries" and Norman Finkelstein’s "The Holocaust Industry". In my senior year of highschool, this was pretty much the only sort of non-fiction I was interested in. I found none of it convincing in the slightest. The essence of your argument seems to be this: Some Jews, who were elected to positions of power within the US government by legal, ethical and democratic means, with the aid of some of their non-Jewish peers, pass laws which result in America becoming less monocultural. Therefore all American Jews deserve to be deported or worse. I think you and I are communicating across some sort of million-mile-wide ethical gap. Have a nice day. I will pray to Cthulhu for your enlightenment and ultimate salvation.
Response:
>Have a nice day. I will pray to Cthulhu for your >enlightenment and ultimate salvation.
Cthulhu cares not for your prayers. He will eat you or perhaps drive you mad for his own amusement.
Response:
JimSummers wrote: > >An observation > by "Jim Winters" <extremereactionfo…@yahoo.com> Sep 16, 2005 at 06:51 > PM > >George Galloway deserves to be raped. > I have a better observation, Jim Winters is a Jew-Lover and deserves to > be raped. Apparently he thinks it is cool if Jews destroy the White race > with multiculturalism and Feminist poison.
Well, can you really blame him for knowing a good idea when he sees it?
Response:
>That’s the problem with buying into a conspiracy theory so
absolutely…there’s no such thing as a difference of opinion. It’s either >"enlightened" or "brainwashed".
No Research= No knowledge, drop the phony act, none of you have studied the issue AT ALL, you simply went with what the media said because you just didn’t care. Being lazy and self absorbed is NOT RESEARCH…. Have you read this book? If not, I’d suggest you shut up and leave it to the experts of which you certainly don’t belong among… http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0759672229/qid=11273318… By the way, your "opinion" nonsense is also full of holes, there is no "opinion" on whether a company is Jew controlled or not, IT EITHER IS OR ISN’T…These are not "opinions" but absolute FACTS…. Start out with Viacom which owns MTV, it is headed by the JEW Sumner Redstone..try showing me how that’s an opinion????
Response:
JimSummers wrote: > Start out with Viacom which owns MTV, it is headed by the JEW Sumner > Redstone..try showing me how that’s an opinion????
How is this relevant? Sure, MTV is annoying, but not as annoying as you are.
Response:
>The essence of your argument seems to be this: Some Jews, who were elected
to positions of power within the US government by legal, ethical and democratic means, with the aid of some of their non-Jewish peers, pass laws which result in America becoming less monocultural.Therefore all >American Jews deserve to be deported or worse.
More than just "some" Jews, more like the most powerful Jewish organizations in the world such as the ADL and B’nai Brith. Also, Jews are only 3% of the U.S. population but they comprised 50% of the membership to the American Communist Party from 1920-1955….the goal of the Communist Party was always to destroy White unity and Christianity which is of course why Jews were so interested in becoming involved in Communism. You do know that Karl Marx was a Jew? So was Trotsky? Kamenev? Zinoviev? Radek? Kaganovich? Yagoda? Rosa Luxembourg? Kurt Eisner? Bela Kun? Eugene Levine? Anna Pauker? I wouldn’t call it "some" Jews, I call it a vast majority of them.. My sister has a Jewish friend and this woman is a major COMMIE and FEMINIST just like most of them…my uncle’s Jewish wife has the same Far-Left Wing politics as well… If you knew anything about the History of Jews in Russia you would know that the Jews there became Marxists after 1880 and brought that destructive ideology here to America to ruin our way of life. Try reading the 1951 classic "Iron Curtain Over America" about the Jewish/Communist plot to destroy White America. http://www.stormfront.org/iron_curtain/contents.html I suspect that your REAL MOTIVE for defending the Jews is one of those typically selfish feminine reasons such as "Oh but I had a Jewish friend in High School"….typical feminine narcissistic behavior…
Response:
JimSummers wrote: > More than just "some" Jews, more like the most powerful Jewish > organizations in the world such as the ADL and B’nai Brith. Also, Jews are > only 3% of the U.S. population but they comprised 50% of the membership to > the American Communist Party from 1920-1955….
Here’s a quick lesson in statistics for you. Super-heavy pot smokers are only 1% of the Canadian population. but they comprise 80% of the membership of my band. Does that mean the vast majority of Canadian pot smokers have been members of my band? > You do know that Karl Marx was a Jew? So was Trotsky? Kamenev? > Zinoviev? Radek? Kaganovich? Yagoda? Rosa Luxembourg? Kurt Eisner? Bela > Kun? Eugene Levine? Anna Pauker?
Geddy Lee? Lou Reed? Mark Knopfler? Joey Ramone? Gene Simmons? I wish you nazis would stop trying to ram the Soviet Union down my throat. It was in the past. Get over it. Jews have made my life better. You haven’t. Please go gas yourself. > I suspect that your REAL MOTIVE for defending the Jews is one of those > typically selfish feminine reasons such as "Oh but I had a Jewish friend > in High School"….typical feminine narcissistic behavior…
No, it’s because I am a man of principle, a concept you don’t seem to be too familiar with. Also, Gene Simmons and Geddy Lee happen to be my two favorite bassists.
Response:
August Pamplona <cosmic…@hotmail.com> wrote in news:3p1h2uF8824tU1@individual.net: – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Jim Winters wrote: >> Mad Mambo Master of Macedonia wrote: >>>"Jim Winters" <extremereactionfo…@yahoo.com> wrote in >>>news:1126921897.127176.296490@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com: >>>>George Galloway deserves to be raped. >>>I thought his performance at the U.S. Senate was hilarious. Can’t >>>say the guy doesn’t know how to give a great performance. Other than >>>that, I don’t know much about him. He was right about the war, >>>though. >> I was sitting 50 feet away from him tonight while he gave a speech. >> He came off as very arrogant and hate-filled. He called Christopher >> Hitchens "rancid and foul". I’ll bet Hitchens doesn’t use that type >> of invective against Galloway behind HIS back.
No, he uses it in print–I think I saw it on Slate.com. They’re going to have a debate or had one this month. Hitchens still supports "democracy" in Iraq. Frankly I think Hitchens will say nearly anything to get attention. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->> He said it was wrong for Carter and Reagan to support Islamic >> militants in Afghanistan because it led indirectly to the creation of >> the Taliban. It also led, more directly, to the collapse of the >> Soviet > Communism did that all by itself. The funding and promotion > of > militant Islam may (or may not) have accelerated the process. Remember > this was done (unofficially under Carter at the end of his term) at a > time when we were already dealing with Islamic fundies in Iran (that > little episode with the hostages at the embassy in Tehran). It’s just > that the powers that be in all of their wisdom decided that the > fundies that we were funding in Afghanistan through Pakistan’s > Intelligence services were different sorts of fundies who’d never > cause any trouble for us.
It began under Carter but continued under Reagan if not expanded, and the most money went to the most extreme islamists. > > Union and the end of the cold war, but Galloway didn’t mention that >> because it didn’t serve his anti-American agenda. >> I’ll say this for him, he knew how to engage his audience. But so do >> Bush and Blair, when the time is right. > August Pamplona
– "You tried to scan me, you freaked-out maniac." –TV’s Frank.
Response:
George Galloway deserves to be raped.
Response:
"Jim Winters" <extremereactionfo…@yahoo.com> wrote in news:1126921897.127176.296490@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com: > George Galloway deserves to be raped.
I thought his performance at the U.S. Senate was hilarious. Can’t say the guy doesn’t know how to give a great performance. Other than that, I don’t know much about him. He was right about the war, though. — "You tried to scan me, you freaked-out maniac." –TV’s Frank.
Response:
Mad Mambo Master of Macedonia wrote: > "Jim Winters" <extremereactionfo…@yahoo.com> wrote in > news:1126921897.127176.296490@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com: > > George Galloway deserves to be raped. > I thought his performance at the U.S. Senate was hilarious. Can’t say the > guy doesn’t know how to give a great performance. Other than that, I don’t > know much about him. He was right about the war, though.
I was sitting 50 feet away from him tonight while he gave a speech. He came off as very arrogant and hate-filled. He called Christopher Hitchens "rancid and foul". I’ll bet Hitchens doesn’t use that type of invective against Galloway behind HIS back. He said it was wrong for Carter and Reagan to support Islamic militants in Afghanistan because it led indirectly to the creation of the Taliban. It also led, more directly, to the collapse of the Soviet Union and the end of the cold war, but Galloway didn’t mention that because it didn’t serve his anti-American agenda. I’ll say this for him, he knew how to engage his audience. But so do Bush and Blair, when the time is right.
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -Jim Winters wrote: > Mad Mambo Master of Macedonia wrote: >>"Jim Winters" <extremereactionfo…@yahoo.com> wrote in >>news:1126921897.127176.296490@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com: >>>George Galloway deserves to be raped. >>I thought his performance at the U.S. Senate was hilarious. Can’t say the >>guy doesn’t know how to give a great performance. Other than that, I don’t >>know much about him. He was right about the war, though. > I was sitting 50 feet away from him tonight while he gave a speech. He > came off as very arrogant and hate-filled. He called Christopher > Hitchens "rancid and foul". I’ll bet Hitchens doesn’t use that type of > invective against Galloway behind HIS back. > He said it was wrong for Carter and Reagan to support Islamic militants > in Afghanistan because it led indirectly to the creation of the > Taliban. It also led, more directly, to the collapse of the Soviet
Communism did that all by itself. The funding and promotion of militant Islam may (or may not) have accelerated the process. Remember this was done (unofficially under Carter at the end of his term) at a time when we were already dealing with Islamic fundies in Iran (that little episode with the hostages at the embassy in Tehran). It’s just that the powers that be in all of their wisdom decided that the fundies that we were funding in Afghanistan through Pakistan’s Intelligence services were different sorts of fundies who’d never cause any trouble for us. > Union and the end of the cold war, but Galloway didn’t mention that > because it didn’t serve his anti-American agenda. > I’ll say this for him, he knew how to engage his audience. But so do > Bush and Blair, when the time is right.
August Pamplona — Women bring men they like tasks in much the same way cats put dead mice on their owner’s pillows. – Lola on a.s.s. a.a. # 1811 apatriot #20 Eater of smut Proud member of the reality-based community. The address in this message’s ‘From’ field, in accordance with individual.net’s TOS, is real. However, almost all messages reaching this address are deleted without human intervention. In other words, if you e-mail me there, I will not receive your message. To make sure that e-mail messages actually reach me, make sure that my e-mail address is not hot.
Response:
Filed under: Feminist
Leave a Comment
XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
TrackBack URL | RSS feed for comments on this post.