Thomas Mohr and artemis are dishonorable

Question:

Irony, I have no idea The phrase listed above is pregnant with meaning.

It means what it means in the context of the sentence in which it was written. If you want to interpret it otherwise, that’s your waste of time, but perhaps your form of entertainment? That’s fine. It seems you are accusing me of "disingenuousness" Call it misguided virtue if you must. It is alowed.

Tell me how I have used "misguided virtue?" I have done nothing dishonest or without virtue. You are coming from left field here with an accusation that means absolutely nothing. I know I am a powerful person, but The statement listed above is interesting.

It sure is! If you were to choose which of the three statements below illustrat the most powerful person would it be one two or three? 1. I know I am a powerful person. 2. I know I am powerful enough to apreciate how powerful I am not. 3. My knowledge of my power is such that I feel no need to verbaly assert my power and in fact I seldom think of it . The three grades of power listed above coinside with three grades of intelectual power, that being what personal power is!

Everyone is a powerful person, Irony, born with a divine spark which we either chose to accept or chose not to accept to use for the good of ourselves and the world. It is indeed sad that some folks aren’t aware of their own personal power. This actually is beyond the concept of pure intellectual matters. Do you know you are also a powerful person with the same divine spark for good? It is a wonderful thing, indeed! Because I am in touch with mine, what you say in regards to my honesty (which is solid) matters not at all because your comments do not change a thing. Your beliefes about me are an illusion. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Now, as to that bloody question. I never said I would answer it, but only that I knew the answer. Lordy, Lordy, how the chickens do come home to roost, that is if Ironrod herds the chickens of truth in your direction. Ironrod did ask of Artemis this question: "What was peculiar about a bed post on the bed of Odysseus?" Which "hen house" of an answer looks like the most fit place to house the chickens of truth? I Artemis know the answer to your question Ironrod. I Artemis know the answer to your question Ironrod, the peculiarity about a bed post on the bed of Odysseus was that the post was the trunk of an olive tree rooted to the ground.

Sigh. Again, you miss my point. Again, that’s your choice. it is neither "lame" nor "dishonest" that I chose to go on to discuss the real points The real points were on the tops of the heads of Artemus and Thomas Mohr for having the dull witted hubrus to think that they could illustrate cultural superiority to a non-deracinated White Male by showing a knowledge of European Culture superior to his.

The real point of a thread and of this newsgroup are matters of activism. My goals as an activist are to help the world get rid of racism, sexism, homophobia, religious intolerance, and the like. A huge goal, but thank God, not one that I am concerned with alone. There are many good people in this world. It doesn’t make one bit of difference what you think. Is the thought listed above a prayer for deliverence from your owm folly?

It is an expression of personal power that what you say makes no difference. My prayer is for love and peace to someday envelop the Earth. Artemis is of no interest to Ironrod from this point onward.

Bye-bye, my friend. A.

Response:

The real point of a thread and of this newsgroup are matters of activism. My goals as an activist are to help the world get rid of racism, sexism, homophobia, religious intolerance, and the like.

Aaaaawwwww. How cute and feminine. I bet you’re a cute wittle female, all soft and mushy, boodghy, boodghy, goo-goo, gah-gah, gaggle-goo! It’s no wonder why females have to wear diapers until they’re 40! Regards, Jason

Response:

The real point of a thread and of this newsgroup are matters of activism. My goals as an activist are to help the world get rid of racism, sexism, homophobia, religious intolerance, and the like. Aaaaawwwww. How cute and feminine. I bet you’re a cute wittle female, all soft and mushy, boodghy, boodghy, goo-goo, gah-gah, gaggle-goo! It’s no wonder why females have to wear diapers until they’re 40!

Barano-witz, you do not understand anything about European culture, right ? In *my* culture, females are *highly* respected, especially in medieveal times.

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – The real point of a thread and of this newsgroup are matters of activism. My goals as an activist are to help the world get rid of racism, sexism, homophobia, religious intolerance, and the like. Aaaaawwwww. How cute and feminine. I bet you’re a cute wittle female, all soft and mushy, boodghy, boodghy, goo-goo, gah-gah, gaggle-goo! It’s no wonder why females have to wear diapers until they’re 40! Barano-witz, you do not understand anything about European culture, right ? In *my* culture, females are *highly* respected, especially in medieveal times.

Which was fine considering that they were not allowed to exercise power (with the exception of Queens who inhereted power). But the Queens had male political advisors, and if the Queen would have started talking nonsense about ridding the world of hierarchy and status, she would have been gotten rid of, one way or another. Regards, Jason

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – The real point of a thread and of this newsgroup are matters of activism. My goals as an activist are to help the world get rid of racism, sexism, homophobia, religious intolerance, and the like. Aaaaawwwww. How cute and feminine. I bet you’re a cute wittle female, all soft and mushy, boodghy, boodghy, What for a naugh. goo-goo, gah-gah, gaggle-goo! It’s no wonder why females have to wear diapers until they’re 40! Barano-witz, you do not understand anything about European culture, right ? In *my* culture, females are *highly* respected, especially in medieveal times. Which was fine considering that they were not allowed to exercise power (with the exception of Queens who inhereted power). But the Queens had male political advisors, and if the Queen would have started talking nonsense about ridding the world of hierarchy and status, she would have been gotten rid of, one way or another.

Response:

gah-gah, gaggle-goo! – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – It’s no wonder why females have to wear diapers until they’re 40! Barano-witz, you do not understand anything about European culture, right ? In *my* culture, females are *highly* respected, especially in medieveal times. Which was fine considering that they were not allowed to exercise power (with the exception of Queens who inhereted power). But the Queens had male political advisors, and if the Queen would have started talking nonsense about ridding the world of hierarchy and status, she would have been gotten rid of, one way or another. Barano-witz, Barano-witz, during the whole middle ages not women exerted power on all levels. Sorry, torpedoed and sunk again ! You know nothing about European culture. Piss off. We don’t need a "defender" like you. Defender, hahahahaha.

Response:

Barano-witz, Barano-witz, during the whole middle ages not women exerted power on all levels. Sorry, torpedoed and sunk again ! You know nothing about European culture. Piss off. We don’t need a "defender" like you. Defender, hahahahaha. <weary sigh Do I have to type out what Pope St. Pius V taught about women to shut you up? Do I have to type out what St. Paul taught about women in the Scriptures? The Middle Ages (Catholic Ages) were not feminist times, Mohr, I hate to break it to you.

Barano-witz, you are in no position to tell *anybody* moral values.

Response:

Do I have to teach you what St. Paul taught about people who think they are better than others ? like f.i. YOU with your racism ?

Response:

Jason, hon, you are indeed a strange little boy. I hope with time you grow up to understand the wonders of this world. A.

Response:

Sorry about the premature pressing of the "send" icon but really Thomas Mohr your superficial intellect amuses me so much that I am often beside myself with joy. You are forever acting like a twelve year old boy. Mohr what is your age? Your statement "especially in medieval times" shows that you do not realize that chivalry was a contemporaneous expression within its era of a uniformly unchanging position of women within White Society, the degeneration of which did not occur until the present era! Allow me to illustrate my point by relating plot elements of an Icelandic Saga. Once there was a married man who had been sentenced to banishment by The Althane. The man decided to not comply with his banishment and went to be with his wife in his home. His neighbors formed a posse to put him to death and attacked him while he was in his home. While fending off the posse from the doorway of his home his bow string broke. When he asked his wife to donate some of her long hair to be twisted into a replacement bow string she refused by asking him if he remembered the time he had slapped her. The response of the husband to his wife’s refusal was his choice to die fighting with a broken bow string rather than take hair from the head of his wife against her will. It is interesting that many of the laws condemned as oppressing women were actually enacted by White Males for the protection of women.

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Barano-witz, you do not understand anything about European culture, right ? In *my* culture, females are *highly* respected, especially in medieveal times.

Response:

< snip Your statement "especially in medieval times" shows that you do not realize that chivalry was a contemporaneous expression within its era of a uniformly unchanging position of women within White Society, the degeneration of which did not occur until the present era! Allow me to illustrate my point by relating plot elements of an Icelandic Saga.

Ironrod, forget it. You are not part of the European culture, I am – and we don#t want tpeople like you here or defending our culture, or what you think it is.

Response:

<weary sigh Do I have to type out what Pope St. Pius V taught about women to shut you up? Do I have to type out what St. Paul taught about women in the Scriptures? The Middle Ages (Catholic Ages) were not feminist times, Mohr, I hate to break it to you. Do I have to teach you what St. Paul taught about people who think they are better than others ? like f.i. YOU with your racism ?

The word "racism" does not appear in the scriptures. Regards, Jason

Response:

The word "racism" does not appear in the scriptures.

Coprrect Jason. And your racism is satanic.

Response:

Ironrod says: Yet again I ask this boy, how old are you Mohr? How old can a person be who thinks that proverbs don’t have authors "because they are proverbs"? How old can a person be who thinks that a proverb can not be a quote? And then there was the bone headed remark that literal translation of Greek is not possible. Now that was a jaw dropper. More on that later. To call Thomas Mohr an ignoramus about European culture and things in general would be an insult to ignoramuses. We are speaking here of both chronological age and mental development. How much of a gap is there…BOY? Ironrod says: "Without racial reciprocity there is no racial justice!"

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Ironrod, forget it. You are not part of the European culture, I am – and we don#t want tpeople like you here or defending our culture, or what you think it is.

Response:

Irony, I have no idea

The phrase listed above is pregnant with meaning. It seems you are accusing me of "disingenuousness"

Call it misguided virtue if you must. It is alowed. I know I am a powerful person, but

The statement listed above is interesting. If you were to choose which of the three statements below illustrat the most powerful person would it be one two or three? 1. I know I am a powerful person. 2. I know I am powerful enough to apreciate how powerful I am not. 3. My knowledge of my power is such that I feel no need to verbaly assert my power and in fact I seldom think of it . The three grades of power listed above coinside with three grades of intelectual power, that being what personal power is! Now, as to that bloody question. I never said I would answer it, but only that I knew the answer.

Lordy, Lordy, how the chickens do come home to roost, that is if Ironrod herds the chickens of truth in your direction. Ironrod did ask of Artemis this question: "What was peculiar about a bed post on the bed of Odysseus?" Which "hen house" of an answer looks like the most fit place to house the chickens of truth? I Artemis know the answer to your question Ironrod. I Artemis know the answer to your question Ironrod, the peculiarity about a bed post on the bed of Odysseus was that the post was the trunk of an olive tree rooted to the ground. it is neither "lame" nor "dishonest" that I chose to go on to discuss the real points

The real points were on the tops of the heads of Artemus and Thomas Mohr for having the dull witted hubrus to think that they could illustrate cultural superiority to a non-deracinated White Male by showing a knowledge of European Culture superior to his. It doesn’t make one bit of difference what you think.

Is the thought listed above a prayer for deliverence from your owm folly? Artemis is of no interest to Ironrod from this point onward. For "Thomas Mohr" Ironrod has more. Where is Mohr? Ironrod says: "Without racial reciprocity there is no racial justice!"

Response:

Sounds like you are reading too much into something, unfounded, and not there. j_2000 http://www.neta.com/~1stbooks/defense.htm

Indeed. Thanks for the simple words of rationality. A. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Follow the thread I had with Thomas Mohr. It can br found on Deja.com. Both of them claimed to know the answer to my question without being willing to tell me the answer. Very lame and dishonest of them both. You will see that I finally gave Thomas Mohr enough clues for his ignorant and arrogant self to figure out the answer. So now he knows the answer and he is demanding that I give him an Essay on the meaning of the answer. It is very interesting that I can not attempt to upload a continuation of the Mohr thread or the artemis thread without a Server rejection. This doesn’t happen with other thread answers to this newsgroup. Looks like mohr and artemis have pulled in the welcome mat by means of a "Server Response 441 Line 4 too long" error. More disingenuousness from the disingenuous "Evil Twins". Before you buy.

Response:

"Look behind the letters"? I was about to write you a damn fine Essay but I deleted it. You are correct in stating that the letters should be looked behind. This is why more than thirty-five years ago I chose a literal translation of Homer’s Odyssey (and Iliad) rather than the popularized translations. However…your reference to the ruse used by the wife of Odysseus to establish his identity is in front of the letters. So what is behind the letters? A great variety of symbols would have served the purpose of illustrating the ruse concept. Not all of these symbols would serve another purpose served by a bed post that was an olive tree trunk rooted to the ground. So what was the other purpose you ask? Well this is obvious is it not? The other purpose was the same purpose that was served by the Epic Poets decision to have the hound of Odysseus die after viewing the return home of Odysseus! GET IT! Question number one for Thomas Mohr: In this Epic Homer chooses to use the symbol of a bedpost that was a rooted olive trunk and the symbol of the death of a loyal dog for the very same important reason. What was this reason? Question number two for Thomas Mohr: In this Poem Homer feels the need to achieve the answer to question number one with two different symbols. Why? A generous hint for the first question (big surprise) is the word Epic. A generous hint for the second question (Another big surprise) is the word Poem. Your move Thomas Mohr. And take my advice. If you want to see behind the letters try to get close to them with a literal translation or the original Greek! – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Look who’s complaining ! Somebody who read a classical work but obviously was not able to look behind the letters.

Response:

Since you called me limpdick you will need to ask Thomas Mohr, the Mohr who told me that a quote from the "Fable of The Boastfull Traveler" was not a quote and that a quote from Aesops’ Fables had no author. He is the quality of source you deserve.

Look who’s complaining ! Somebody who read a classical work but obviously was not able to look behind the letters.

Response:

Sounds like you are reading too much into something, unfounded, and not there. j_2000 http://www.neta.com/~1stbooks/defense.htm – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Follow the thread I had with Thomas Mohr. It can br found on Deja.com. Both of them claimed to know the answer to my question without being willing to tell me the answer. Very lame and dishonest of them both. You will see that I finally gave Thomas Mohr enough clues for his ignorant and arrogant self to figure out the answer. So now he knows the answer and he is demanding that I give him an Essay on the meaning of the answer. It is very interesting that I can not attempt to upload a continuation of the Mohr thread or the artemis thread without a Server rejection. This doesn’t happen with other thread answers to this newsgroup. Looks like mohr and artemis have pulled in the welcome mat by means of a "Server Response 441 Line 4 too long" error. More disingenuousness from the disingenuous "Evil Twins".

Before you buy.

Response:

Ironrod, I knew the answer from the beginning, but your constant avoidance of the answer to my question, what was the *importance* of the peculiarity of said bed leads to the conclusion that you don’t know it. So, I will give you a hint. The clue to the *importance* of the peculiarity of the bed lies in a certain question Penelope asks.

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Follow the thread I had with Thomas Mohr. It can br found on Deja.com. Both of them claimed to know the answer to my question without being willing to tell me the answer. Very lame and dishonest of them both. You will see that I finally gave Thomas Mohr enough clues for his ignorant and arrogant self to figure out the answer. So now he knows the answer and he is demanding that I give him an Essay on the meaning of the answer. It is very interesting that I can not attempt to upload a continuation of the Mohr thread or the artemis thread without a Server rejection. This doesn’t happen with other thread answers to this newsgroup. Looks like mohr and artemis have pulled in the welcome mat by means of a "Server Response 441 Line 4 too long" error. More disingenuousness from the disingenuous "Evil Twins".

Irony, I have no idea what a "Server Response 441 Line 4 too long" error is. I never type excessively long answers as I have a life and other things to do with my time. It seems you are accusing me of "disingenuousness" because something went screwy with your server. This is a problem between you, your server, and your computer. I know I am a powerful person, but even I am not a computer genie who can bungle up someone else’s system. Anyone who has read this entire thread know that my answers are short and to the point. Always. Now, as to that bloody question. I never said I would answer it, but only that I knew the answer. It is amazing that your shorts are in such a twist because I don’t want to come out and play your silly game which has nothing to do with activism. My friend, it is neither "lame" nor "dishonest" that I chose to go on to discuss the real points in this thread instead of playing "Who Wants to Be A Millionaire" with you. If you chose to believe that is dishonest, that’s your choice. It doesn’t make one bit of difference what you think. A.

Response:

Well, tell us what the question is, LimpDick.

Response:

Follow the thread I had with Thomas Mohr. It can br found on Deja.com. Both of them claimed to know the answer to my question without being willing to tell me the answer. Very lame and dishonest of them both. You will see that I finally gave Thomas Mohr enough clues for his ignorant and arrogant self to figure out the answer. So now he knows the answer and he is demanding that I give him an Essay on the meaning of the answer. It is very interesting that I can not attempt to upload a continuation of the Mohr thread or the artemis thread without a Server rejection. This doesn’t happen with other thread answers to this newsgroup. Looks like mohr and artemis have pulled in the welcome mat by means of a "Server Response 441 Line 4 too long" error. More disingenuousness from the disingenuous "Evil Twins".

Response:

Filed under: Feminist Activism

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

TrackBack URL | RSS feed for comments on this post.

Activism Change

Learn, read, react :: Activism