<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Activism Change &#187; Feminist Activism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://activismchange.com/feminist-activism/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://activismchange.com</link>
	<description>Learn, read, react :: Activism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2010 14:38:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>A Question for Eric Strulowitz</title>
		<link>http://activismchange.com/feminist-activism/a-question-for-eric-strulowitz-1002388.html</link>
		<comments>http://activismchange.com/feminist-activism/a-question-for-eric-strulowitz-1002388.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Feminist Activism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://activismchange.com/uncategorized/a-question-for-eric-strulowitz-1002388.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Question:
  &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211; Eric&#44;   I seem to recall that you are a registered nurse. Here&#8217;s my question&#44;   Martha Burk&#8217;s group&#44; the National Council of Womens Organizations&#44; lists   the American Nurses Association as a member.   Is the ANA a &#34;womens [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h4><strong>Question:</strong></h4>
<p>  &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211; Eric&#44;   I seem to recall that you are a registered nurse. Here&#8217;s my question&#44;   Martha Burk&#8217;s group&#44; the National Council of Womens Organizations&#44; lists   the American Nurses Association as a member.   Is the ANA a &quot;womens organization&quot;? Isn&#8217;t the nursing profession open to   both sexes with equal opportunity? Does the ANA accept men as members?   And the most important question&#44; how do the interests of nursing   professionals align with the radical feminist agenda of the NCWO?   Do nurses demand a female member at Augusta National?   -Robert   BTW&#44; &nbsp;my spell checker suggests COW in place of NCWO. Very interesting. </p>
<p>Robert&#44;  I have long been familiar with the American Nurses Association and have  preferred not to have any affililation with them. &nbsp;Their agenda is clearly  very feminist and it would not surprise me if they were affiliated with  organizations as NOW. &nbsp;I have read their publications and was turned off by  the high level of activism and strong rhetoric against doctors and the  medical establishement. &nbsp;They want nurses empowered and believe they should  be the driving force behind the medical establishement. &nbsp;Frankly&#44; i am just  content to put in a days work and go home and not be bothered by such  nonsense. &nbsp; &nbsp;Men are welcome into the organization &#44; but i doubt there are a  whole lot of male members. &nbsp;The other thing is that the ANA is very active  in union organizing activities and having worked in both union and non union  environments over my career&#44; i prefer non-union. &nbsp;Even if your pay and  benefits are not perfect&#44; i would find it very hard to walk out on sick  patients.  In answer to your question about nurses wanting a female member at Augusta  National&#44; i can only say that most nurses in my experience tend to be on the  liberal side&#44; so it would not surprise me if many of them would be in favor  of a female member.  It will be interesting to see how the whole situation develops. &nbsp;I heard  Jessie Jackson is planning protests at the Masters. &nbsp; I saw Al Sharpton on  TV the other day talking about this. &nbsp; I hope that this event does not  become a circus.  best regards&#44;  Eric </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p> It will be interesting to see how the whole situation develops. &nbsp;I heard  Jessie Jackson is planning protests at the Masters. &nbsp; I saw Al Sharpton on  TV the other day talking about this. &nbsp; I hope that this event does not  become a circus. </p>
<p>I think it would be funny if Hootie held a big news conference during Masters  week and announced that ANGC had added a few women members &quot;months ago.&quot; &nbsp;When  they ask him why he didn&#8217;t announce it then he should just say&#44; &quot;Cause it was  noneya damn business!&quot; </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>  I think it would be funny if Hootie held a big news conference during  Masters   week and announced that ANGC had added a few women members &quot;months   ago.&quot; &nbsp;When they ask him why he didn&#8217;t announce it then he should just  say&#44;   &quot;Cause it was noneya damn business!&quot; </p>
<p>Well let the air outta my tire!!!  That would serve them right!  &#8212;  bill-o </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>Eric&#44;  I seem to recall that you are a registered nurse. Here&#8217;s my question&#44;  Martha Burk&#8217;s group&#44; the National Council of Womens Organizations&#44; lists  the American Nurses Association as a member.  Is the ANA a &quot;womens organization&quot;? Isn&#8217;t the nursing profession open to  both sexes with equal opportunity? Does the ANA accept men as members?  And the most important question&#44; how do the interests of nursing  professionals align with the radical feminist agenda of the NCWO?  Do nurses demand a female member at Augusta National?  -Robert  BTW&#44; &nbsp;my spell checker suggests COW in place of NCWO. Very interesting. </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>- Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211; Eric&#44;   I seem to recall that you are a registered nurse. Here&#8217;s my question&#44;   Martha Burk&#8217;s group&#44; the National Council of Womens Organizations&#44; lists   the American Nurses Association as a member.   Is the ANA a &quot;womens organization&quot;? Isn&#8217;t the nursing profession open to   both sexes with equal opportunity? Does the ANA accept men as members?   And the most important question&#44; how do the interests of nursing   professionals align with the radical feminist agenda of the NCWO?   Do nurses demand a female member at Augusta National?   -Robert   BTW&#44; &nbsp;my spell checker suggests COW in place of NCWO. Very interesting. </p>
<p>Eric isn&#8217;t the only RN on RSG. &nbsp;I could care less when or if Augusta decides  to have a female member. &nbsp;I get a little hot when someone refers to nursing  as a female only profession. &nbsp;I only work so I can have a flexible schedule  to play 3 or 4 times a week. &nbsp;I&#8217;d play more and work less&#44; but greens fees  cost money&#44; and I have to do something productive. &nbsp;Of course the horse  doesn&#8217;t help either. &nbsp;:)  Sarah  ICU nurse with good drugs and a bag full of Titleists. </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://activismchange.com/feminist-activism/a-question-for-eric-strulowitz-1002388.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thomas Mohr and artemis are dishonorable</title>
		<link>http://activismchange.com/feminist-activism/thomas-mohr-and-artemis-are-dishonorable-2083784.html</link>
		<comments>http://activismchange.com/feminist-activism/thomas-mohr-and-artemis-are-dishonorable-2083784.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Feminist Activism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://activismchange.com/uncategorized/thomas-mohr-and-artemis-are-dishonorable-2083784.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Question:
    Irony&#44; I have no idea   The phrase listed above is pregnant with meaning. 
It means what it means in the context of the sentence in which it was  written. If you want  to interpret it otherwise&#44; that&#8217;s your waste of time&#44; but perhaps your form  of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h4><strong>Question:</strong></h4>
<p>    Irony&#44; I have no idea   The phrase listed above is pregnant with meaning. </p>
<p>It means what it means in the context of the sentence in which it was  written. If you want  to interpret it otherwise&#44; that&#8217;s your waste of time&#44; but perhaps your form  of entertainment? That&#8217;s fine.    It seems you are accusing me of &nbsp;&quot;disingenuousness&quot;   Call it misguided virtue if you must. It is alowed. </p>
<p>Tell me how I have used &quot;misguided virtue?&quot; I have done nothing dishonest or  without virtue. You are coming from left field here with an accusation that  means absolutely nothing.    I know I am a powerful person&#44; but   The statement listed above is interesting. </p>
<p>It sure is!   If you were to choose which of the three statements below   illustrat the most powerful person would it be one two or three?   1. I know I am a powerful person.   2. I know I am powerful enough to apreciate how powerful I am not.   3. My knowledge of my power is such that I feel no need to verbaly assert  my   power   &nbsp; &nbsp; and in fact I seldom think of it .   The three grades of power listed above coinside with three grades of   intelectual   power&#44; that being what personal power is! </p>
<p>Everyone is a powerful person&#44; Irony&#44; born with a divine spark which we  either chose to accept or chose not to accept to use for the good of  ourselves and the world. It is indeed sad that some folks aren&#8217;t aware of  their own personal power. This actually is beyond the concept of pure  intellectual matters. Do you know you are also a powerful person with the  same divine spark for good? It is a wonderful thing&#44; indeed! Because I am in  touch with mine&#44; what you say in regards to my honesty (which is solid)  matters not at all because your comments do not change a thing. Your  beliefes about me are an illusion.  &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211;  Now&#44; as to that bloody question. I never said I would answer it&#44; but  only    that I knew the answer.   Lordy&#44; Lordy&#44; how the chickens do come home to roost&#44; that is if Ironrod   herds the   chickens of truth in your direction.   Ironrod did ask of Artemis this question: &quot;What was peculiar about a bed   post on   the bed of Odysseus?&quot;   Which &quot;hen house&quot; of an answer looks like the most fit place to house the   chickens   of truth?   I Artemis know the answer to your question Ironrod.   I Artemis know the answer to your question Ironrod&#44; the peculiarity about  a   bed post   on the bed of Odysseus was that the post was the trunk of an olive tree   rooted to   the ground. </p>
<p>Sigh. Again&#44; you miss my point. Again&#44; that&#8217;s your choice.    it is neither &quot;lame&quot; nor &quot;dishonest&quot; that I    chose to go on to discuss the real points   The real points were on the tops of the heads of Artemus and Thomas Mohr   for having the dull witted hubrus to think that they could illustrate   cultural superiority   to a non-deracinated White Male by showing a knowledge of European Culture   superior to his. </p>
<p>The real point of a thread and of this newsgroup are matters of activism. My  goals as an activist are to help the world get rid of racism&#44; sexism&#44;  homophobia&#44; religious intolerance&#44; and the like. A huge goal&#44; but thank God&#44;  not one that I am concerned with alone. There are many good people in this  world.    It doesn&#8217;t make one bit of difference what    you think.   Is the thought listed above a prayer for deliverence from your owm folly? </p>
<p>It is an expression of personal power that what you say makes no difference.  My prayer is for love and peace to someday envelop the Earth.   Artemis is of no interest to Ironrod from this point onward. </p>
<p>Bye-bye&#44; my friend.  A. </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>   The real point of a thread and of this newsgroup are matters of activism.  My   goals as an activist are to help the world get rid of racism&#44; sexism&#44;   homophobia&#44; religious intolerance&#44; and the like. </p>
<p>Aaaaawwwww. How cute and feminine. I bet you&#8217;re a cute wittle female&#44; all  soft and mushy&#44; boodghy&#44; boodghy&#44; goo-goo&#44; gah-gah&#44; gaggle-goo!  It&#8217;s no wonder why females have to wear diapers until they&#8217;re 40!  Regards&#44;  Jason </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>   The real point of a thread and of this newsgroup are matters of activism.   My    goals as an activist are to help the world get rid of racism&#44; sexism&#44;    homophobia&#44; religious intolerance&#44; and the like.   Aaaaawwwww. How cute and feminine. I bet you&#8217;re a cute wittle female&#44; all   soft and mushy&#44; boodghy&#44; boodghy&#44; goo-goo&#44; gah-gah&#44; gaggle-goo!   It&#8217;s no wonder why females have to wear diapers until they&#8217;re 40! </p>
<p>Barano-witz&#44; you do not understand anything about European culture&#44;  right ? In *my* culture&#44; females are *highly* respected&#44; especially in  medieveal times. </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>  &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211;    The real point of a thread and of this newsgroup are matters of  activism.    My     goals as an activist are to help the world get rid of racism&#44; sexism&#44;     homophobia&#44; religious intolerance&#44; and the like.    Aaaaawwwww. How cute and feminine. I bet you&#8217;re a cute wittle female&#44;  all    soft and mushy&#44; boodghy&#44; boodghy&#44; goo-goo&#44; gah-gah&#44; gaggle-goo!    It&#8217;s no wonder why females have to wear diapers until they&#8217;re 40!   Barano-witz&#44; you do not understand anything about European culture&#44;   right ? In *my* culture&#44; females are *highly* respected&#44; especially in   medieveal times. </p>
<p>Which was fine considering that they were not allowed to exercise power  (with the exception of Queens who inhereted power). But the Queens had male  political advisors&#44; and if the Queen would have started talking nonsense  about ridding the world of hierarchy and status&#44; she would have been gotten  rid of&#44; one way or another.  Regards&#44;  Jason </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>- Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211;     The real point of a thread and of this newsgroup are matters of   activism.     My      goals as an activist are to help the world get rid of racism&#44; sexism&#44;      homophobia&#44; religious intolerance&#44; and the like.     Aaaaawwwww. How cute and feminine. I bet you&#8217;re a cute wittle female&#44;   all     soft and mushy&#44; boodghy&#44; boodghy&#44; What for a naugh. goo-goo&#44; gah-gah&#44; gaggle-goo!     It&#8217;s no wonder why females have to wear diapers until they&#8217;re 40!    Barano-witz&#44; you do not understand anything about European culture&#44;    right ? In *my* culture&#44; females are *highly* respected&#44; especially in    medieveal times.   Which was fine considering that they were not allowed to exercise power   (with the exception of Queens who inhereted power). But the Queens had male   political advisors&#44; and if the Queen would have started talking nonsense   about ridding the world of hierarchy and status&#44; she would have been gotten   rid of&#44; one way or another. </p>
<p>Barano-witz&#44; Barano-witz&#44; during the whole middle ages not women exerted  power on all levels. Sorry&#44; torpedoed and sunk again ! You know nothing  about European culture. Piss off. We don&#8217;t need a &quot;defender&quot; like you.  Defender&#44; hahahahaha. </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>  &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211;      The real point of a thread and of this newsgroup are matters of    activism.      My       goals as an activist are to help the world get rid of racism&#44;  sexism&#44;       homophobia&#44; religious intolerance&#44; and the like.      Aaaaawwwww. How cute and feminine. I bet you&#8217;re a cute wittle  female&#44;    all      soft and mushy&#44; boodghy&#44; boodghy&#44; What for a naugh. goo-goo&#44; </p>
<p>gah-gah&#44; gaggle-goo!  &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211;    It&#8217;s no wonder why females have to wear diapers until they&#8217;re 40!     Barano-witz&#44; you do not understand anything about European culture&#44;     right ? In *my* culture&#44; females are *highly* respected&#44; especially in     medieveal times.    Which was fine considering that they were not allowed to exercise power    (with the exception of Queens who inhereted power). But the Queens had  male    political advisors&#44; and if the Queen would have started talking nonsense    about ridding the world of hierarchy and status&#44; she would have been  gotten    rid of&#44; one way or another.   Barano-witz&#44; Barano-witz&#44; during the whole middle ages not women exerted   power on all levels. Sorry&#44; torpedoed and sunk again ! You know nothing   about European culture. Piss off. We don&#8217;t need a &quot;defender&quot; like you.   Defender&#44; hahahahaha. </p>
<p>&lt;weary sigh Do I have to type out what Pope St. Pius V taught about women  to shut you up? Do I have to type out what St. Paul taught about women in  the Scriptures? The Middle Ages (Catholic Ages) were not feminist times&#44;  Mohr&#44; I hate to break it to you.  Regards&#44;  Jason </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>   Barano-witz&#44; Barano-witz&#44; during the whole middle ages not women exerted    power on all levels. Sorry&#44; torpedoed and sunk again ! You know nothing    about European culture. Piss off. We don&#8217;t need a &quot;defender&quot; like you.    Defender&#44; hahahahaha.   &lt;weary sigh Do I have to type out what Pope St. Pius V taught about women   to shut you up? Do I have to type out what St. Paul taught about women in   the Scriptures? The Middle Ages (Catholic Ages) were not feminist times&#44;   Mohr&#44; I hate to break it to you. </p>
<p>Barano-witz&#44; you are in no position to tell *anybody* moral values. </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>  &lt;weary sigh Do I have to type out what Pope St. Pius V taught about women   to shut you up? Do I have to type out what St. Paul taught about women in   the Scriptures? The Middle Ages (Catholic Ages) were not feminist times&#44;   Mohr&#44; I hate to break it to you. </p>
<p>Do I have to teach you what St. Paul taught about people who think they  are better than others ? like f.i. YOU with your racism ? </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>  &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211;   The real point of a thread and of this newsgroup are matters of  activism.   My    goals as an activist are to help the world get rid of racism&#44; sexism&#44;    homophobia&#44; religious intolerance&#44; and the like.   Aaaaawwwww. How cute and feminine. I bet you&#8217;re a cute wittle female&#44; all   soft and mushy&#44; boodghy&#44; boodghy&#44; goo-goo&#44; gah-gah&#44; gaggle-goo!   It&#8217;s no wonder why females have to wear diapers until they&#8217;re 40!   Regards&#44;   Jason </p>
<p>Jason&#44; hon&#44; you are indeed a strange little boy. I hope with time you grow  up to understand the wonders of this world.  A. </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>  &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211;    The real point of a thread and of this newsgroup are matters of  activism.    My     goals as an activist are to help the world get rid of racism&#44; sexism&#44;     homophobia&#44; religious intolerance&#44; and the like.    Aaaaawwwww. How cute and feminine. I bet you&#8217;re a cute wittle female&#44;  all    soft and mushy&#44; boodghy&#44; boodghy&#44; goo-goo&#44; gah-gah&#44; gaggle-goo!    It&#8217;s no wonder why females have to wear diapers until they&#8217;re 40!   Barano-witz&#44; you do not understand anything about European culture&#44;   right ? In *my* culture&#44; females are *highly* respected&#44; especially in   medieveal times.  </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>Sorry about the premature pressing of the &quot;send&quot; icon but really  Thomas Mohr your superficial intellect amuses me so much that  I am often beside myself with joy.  You are forever acting like a twelve year old boy.  Mohr what is your age?  Your statement &quot;especially in medieval times&quot; shows that you  do not realize that chivalry was a contemporaneous expression  within its era of a uniformly unchanging position of women  within White Society&#44; the degeneration of which did not occur  until the present era!  Allow me to illustrate my point by relating plot elements of an  Icelandic Saga.  Once there was a married man who had been sentenced to banishment  by The Althane.  The man decided to not comply with his banishment and went to be with  his wife in his home.  His neighbors formed a posse to put him to death and attacked him while  he was in his home.  While fending off the posse from the doorway of his home his bow string  broke.  When he asked his wife to donate some of her long hair to be twisted into a  replacement bow string she refused by asking him if he remembered the time  he had slapped her.  The response of the husband to his wife&#8217;s refusal was his choice to die  fighting  with a broken bow string rather than take hair from the head of his wife  against  her will.  It is interesting that many of the laws condemned as oppressing women were  actually  enacted by White Males for the protection of women. </p>
<p> &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211; Barano-witz&#44; you do not understand anything about European culture&#44;   right ? In *my* culture&#44; females are *highly* respected&#44; especially in   medieveal times.  </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p> &lt; snip    Your statement &quot;especially in medieval times&quot; shows that you   do not realize that chivalry was a contemporaneous expression   within its era of a uniformly unchanging position of women   within White Society&#44; the degeneration of which did not occur   until the present era!   Allow me to illustrate my point by relating plot elements of an   Icelandic Saga. </p>
<p>Ironrod&#44; forget it. You are not part of the European culture&#44; I am &#8211; and  we don#t want tpeople like you here or defending our culture&#44; or what  you think it is. </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>    &lt;weary sigh Do I have to type out what Pope St. Pius V taught about  women    to shut you up? Do I have to type out what St. Paul taught about women  in    the Scriptures? The Middle Ages (Catholic Ages) were not feminist times&#44;    Mohr&#44; I hate to break it to you.   Do I have to teach you what St. Paul taught about people who think they   are better than others ? like f.i. YOU with your racism ? </p>
<p>The word &quot;racism&quot; does not appear in the scriptures.  Regards&#44;  Jason </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>  The word &quot;racism&quot; does not appear in the scriptures. </p>
<p>Coprrect Jason. And your racism is satanic. </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>Ironrod says:  Yet again I ask this boy&#44; how old are you Mohr?  How old can a person be who thinks that proverbs don&#8217;t have authors  &quot;because they are proverbs&quot;?  How old can a person be who thinks that a proverb can not be a quote?  And then there was the bone headed remark that literal translation of Greek  is not possible. Now that was a jaw dropper. More on that later.  To call Thomas Mohr an ignoramus about European culture and things in  general would be an insult to ignoramuses.  We are speaking here of both chronological age and mental development.  How much of a gap is there&#8230;BOY?  Ironrod says: &quot;Without racial reciprocity there is no racial justice!&quot; </p>
<p> &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211; Ironrod&#44; forget it. You are not part of the European culture&#44; I am &#8211; and   we don#t want tpeople like you here or defending our culture&#44; or what   you think it is.  </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>   Irony&#44; I have no idea </p>
<p>The phrase listed above is pregnant with meaning.   It seems you are accusing me of &nbsp;&quot;disingenuousness&quot; </p>
<p>Call it misguided virtue if you must. It is alowed.   I know I am a powerful person&#44; but </p>
<p>The statement listed above is interesting.  If you were to choose which of the three statements below  illustrat the most powerful person would it be one two or three?  1. I know I am a powerful person.  2. I know I am powerful enough to apreciate how powerful I am not.  3. My knowledge of my power is such that I feel no need to verbaly assert my  power  &nbsp; &nbsp; and in fact I seldom think of it .  The three grades of power listed above coinside with three grades of  intelectual  power&#44; that being what personal power is!   Now&#44; as to that bloody question. I never said I would answer it&#44; but only   that I knew the answer. </p>
<p>Lordy&#44; Lordy&#44; how the chickens do come home to roost&#44; that is if Ironrod  herds the  chickens of truth in your direction.  Ironrod did ask of Artemis this question: &quot;What was peculiar about a bed  post on  the bed of Odysseus?&quot;  Which &quot;hen house&quot; of an answer looks like the most fit place to house the  chickens  of truth?  I Artemis know the answer to your question Ironrod.  I Artemis know the answer to your question Ironrod&#44; the peculiarity about a  bed post  on the bed of Odysseus was that the post was the trunk of an olive tree  rooted to  the ground.   it is neither &quot;lame&quot; nor &quot;dishonest&quot; that I   chose to go on to discuss the real points </p>
<p>The real points were on the tops of the heads of Artemus and Thomas Mohr  for having the dull witted hubrus to think that they could illustrate  cultural superiority  to a non-deracinated White Male by showing a knowledge of European Culture  superior to his.   It doesn&#8217;t make one bit of difference what   you think. </p>
<p>Is the thought listed above a prayer for deliverence from your owm folly?  Artemis is of no interest to Ironrod from this point onward.  For &quot;Thomas Mohr&quot; Ironrod has more. Where is Mohr?  Ironrod says: &quot;Without racial reciprocity there is no racial justice!&quot; </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>  &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Sounds like you are reading too much into something&#44;   unfounded&#44; and not there.   j_2000 http://www.neta.com/~1stbooks/defense.htm </p>
<p>Indeed. Thanks for the simple words of rationality.  A.  &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211;   Follow the thread I had with Thomas Mohr.    It can br found on Deja.com.    Both of them claimed to know the answer to my question without    being willing to tell me the answer. Very lame and dishonest of them   both.    You will see that I finally gave Thomas Mohr enough clues for his   ignorant    and arrogant self to figure out the answer.    So now he knows the answer and he is demanding that I give him an   Essay    on the meaning of the answer.    It is very interesting that I can not attempt to upload a continuation   of    the Mohr thread    or the artemis thread without a Server rejection. This doesn&#8217;t happen   with    other thread    answers to this newsgroup. Looks like mohr and artemis have pulled in   the    welcome    mat by means of a &quot;Server Response 441 Line 4 too long&quot; error. More    disingenuousness    from the disingenuous &quot;Evil Twins&quot;.   Before you buy.  </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>&quot;Look behind the letters&quot;?  I was about to write you a damn fine Essay but I deleted it.  You are correct in stating that the letters should be looked behind.  This is why more than thirty-five years ago I chose a literal translation  of Homer&#8217;s Odyssey (and Iliad) rather than the popularized translations.  However&#8230;your reference to the ruse used by the wife of Odysseus  to establish his identity is in front of the letters.  So what is behind the letters? A great variety of symbols would have served  the purpose of illustrating the ruse concept. Not all of these symbols would  serve another purpose served by a bed post that was an olive tree trunk  rooted  to the ground.  So what was the other purpose you ask? Well this is obvious is it not?  The other purpose was the same purpose that was served by the Epic Poets  decision to have the hound of Odysseus die after viewing the return home of  Odysseus! GET IT!  Question number one for Thomas Mohr: In this Epic Homer chooses to use  the symbol of a bedpost that was a rooted olive trunk and the symbol of &nbsp;the  death of a loyal dog for the very same important reason. What was this  reason?  Question number two for Thomas Mohr: In this Poem Homer feels the need to  achieve the answer to question number one with two different symbols. Why?  A generous hint for the first question (big surprise) is the word Epic.  A generous hint for the second question (Another big surprise) is the word  Poem.  Your move Thomas Mohr. And take my advice. If you want to see behind the  letters  try to get close to them with a literal translation or the original Greek!  &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211;  Look who&#8217;s complaining ! Somebody who read a classical work but   obviously was not able to look behind the letters.  </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>  Since you called me limpdick you will need to ask   Thomas Mohr&#44; the Mohr who told me that a quote   from the &quot;Fable of The Boastfull Traveler&quot; was not a quote   and that a quote from Aesops&#8217; Fables had no author.   He is the quality of source you deserve. </p>
<p>Look who&#8217;s complaining ! Somebody who read a classical work but  obviously was not able to look behind the letters. </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Sounds like you are reading too much into something&#44;  unfounded&#44; and not there.  j_2000 http://www.neta.com/~1stbooks/defense.htm  &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211; Follow the thread I had with Thomas Mohr.   It can br found on Deja.com.   Both of them claimed to know the answer to my question without   being willing to tell me the answer. Very lame and dishonest of them  both.   You will see that I finally gave Thomas Mohr enough clues for his  ignorant   and arrogant self to figure out the answer.   So now he knows the answer and he is demanding that I give him an  Essay   on the meaning of the answer.   It is very interesting that I can not attempt to upload a continuation  of   the Mohr thread   or the artemis thread without a Server rejection. This doesn&#8217;t happen  with   other thread   answers to this newsgroup. Looks like mohr and artemis have pulled in  the   welcome   mat by means of a &quot;Server Response 441 Line 4 too long&quot; error. More   disingenuousness   from the disingenuous &quot;Evil Twins&quot;. </p>
<p> Before you buy. </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>Since you called me limpdick you will need to ask  Thomas Mohr&#44; the Mohr who told me that a quote  from the &quot;Fable of The Boastfull Traveler&quot; was not a quote  and that a quote from Aesops&#8217; Fables had no author.  He is the quality of source you deserve.  Ironrod says: &quot;Without racial reciprocity there is no racial justice!&quot; </p>
<p> &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211;   Follow the thread I had with Thomas Mohr.    It can br found on Deja.com.    Both of them claimed to know the answer to my question without    being willing to tell me the answer. Very lame and dishonest of them  both.   Well&#44; tell us what the question is&#44; LimpDick.  </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>  Follow the thread I had with Thomas Mohr.   It can br found on Deja.com.   Both of them claimed to know the answer to my question without   being willing to tell me the answer. Very lame and dishonest of them both.   You will see that I finally gave Thomas Mohr enough clues for his ignorant   and arrogant self to figure out the answer. </p>
<p>Ironrod&#44; I knew the answer from the beginning&#44; but your constant  avoidance of the answer to my question&#44; what was the *importance* of the  peculiarity of said bed leads to the conclusion that you don&#8217;t know it.  So&#44; I will give you a hint. The clue to the *importance* of the  peculiarity of the bed lies in a certain question Penelope asks. </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>  &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211; Follow the thread I had with Thomas Mohr.   It can br found on Deja.com.   Both of them claimed to know the answer to my question without   being willing to tell me the answer. Very lame and dishonest of them both.   You will see that I finally gave Thomas Mohr enough clues for his ignorant   and arrogant self to figure out the answer.   So now he knows the answer and he is demanding that I give him an Essay   on the meaning of the answer.   It is very interesting that I can not attempt to upload a continuation of   the Mohr thread   or the artemis thread without a Server rejection. This doesn&#8217;t happen with   other thread   answers to this newsgroup. Looks like mohr and artemis have pulled in the   welcome   mat by means of a &quot;Server Response 441 Line 4 too long&quot; error. More   disingenuousness   from the disingenuous &quot;Evil Twins&quot;. </p>
<p>Irony&#44; I have no idea what a &quot;Server Response 441 Line 4 too long&quot; error is.  I never type excessively long answers as I have a life and other things to  do with my time. It seems you are accusing me of &nbsp;&quot;disingenuousness&quot; because  something went screwy with your server. This is a problem between you&#44; your  server&#44; and your computer. I know I am a powerful person&#44; but even I am not  a computer genie who can bungle up someone else&#8217;s system. Anyone who has  read this entire thread know that my answers are short and to the point.  Always.  Now&#44; as to that bloody question. I never said I would answer it&#44; but only  that I knew the answer. It is amazing that your shorts are in such a twist  because I don&#8217;t want to come out and play your silly game which has nothing  to do with activism. My friend&#44; it is neither &quot;lame&quot; nor &quot;dishonest&quot; that I  chose to go on to discuss the real points in this thread instead of playing  &quot;Who Wants to Be A Millionaire&quot; with you. If you chose to believe that is  dishonest&#44; that&#8217;s your choice. It doesn&#8217;t make one bit of difference what  you think.  A. </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>   Follow the thread I had with Thomas Mohr.   It can br found on Deja.com.   Both of them claimed to know the answer to my question without   being willing to tell me the answer. Very lame and dishonest of them both. </p>
<p>Well&#44; tell us what the question is&#44; LimpDick. </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>Follow the thread I had with Thomas Mohr.  It can br found on Deja.com.  Both of them claimed to know the answer to my question without  being willing to tell me the answer. Very lame and dishonest of them both.  You will see that I finally gave Thomas Mohr enough clues for his ignorant  and arrogant self to figure out the answer.  So now he knows the answer and he is demanding that I give him an Essay  on the meaning of the answer.  It is very interesting that I can not attempt to upload a continuation of  the Mohr thread  or the artemis thread without a Server rejection. This doesn&#8217;t happen with  other thread  answers to this newsgroup. Looks like mohr and artemis have pulled in the  welcome  mat by means of a &quot;Server Response 441 Line 4 too long&quot; error. More  disingenuousness  from the disingenuous &quot;Evil Twins&quot;. </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://activismchange.com/feminist-activism/thomas-mohr-and-artemis-are-dishonorable-2083784.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;The 60s&quot;</title>
		<link>http://activismchange.com/feminist-activism/the-60s-342942.html</link>
		<comments>http://activismchange.com/feminist-activism/the-60s-342942.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Feminist Activism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://activismchange.com/uncategorized/the-60s-342942.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Question:
as my dad would say&#8230;we are only as old as we feel and I feel like Peter  Pan!  Cutie 

Response:
i&#8217;m an old hippie and i don&#8217;t know what to do&#8230;should i hang on to the old&#8230;or  grab on to the new  hmmmm &#160; &#160;Deb  &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h4><strong>Question:</strong></h4>
<p>as my dad would say&#8230;we are only as old as we feel and I feel like Peter  Pan!  Cutie </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>i&#8217;m an old hippie and i don&#8217;t know what to do&#8230;should i hang on to the old&#8230;or  grab on to the new  hmmmm &nbsp; &nbsp;Deb  &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211;    any baby boomer old hippies out there? did you turn out as badly as your     parents feared?   &nbsp;Got in on this thread a little late. &nbsp;I watched the last 1 1/2 hours of the   Sixties and frankly I thought it was a little bit trivialized but then I   thought about it and that nice tidy happy ending is what really happened in a   lot of cases. &nbsp;Parents realized that they still loved their kids no matter   what&#44; and then everything was sort of ok again&#44; except for the vets that are   screwed up for life&#8230;..so maybe that ending was more realistic than hollywood   fantasy. &nbsp;at least that is what it was like for me &nbsp; although i gotta admit   that those brothers finding their sister at Woodstock was just a little bit   goofy   suzanne (i too am older then dirt)   OCEAN TRIBE (windsurf&#44;surf&#44;skatesail&#44;skate)   gold beach/pistol river oregon   http://www.angelfire.com/or/oceantribe/index.html  </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>I got on the bus in 1960 and it has been a great ride. &nbsp;Yeah&#44; I&#8217;ve had  13 months in psych wards but probably would have anyway. &nbsp;I&#8217;ve seen a  lot and done more than most folks in a couple of lifetimes. &nbsp;What&#8217;s more  my kids and their friends think I&#8217;m a preety cool dude.  &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; As for parents&#44; I remember my conservative school teacher mother asking  me if I smoked grass. &nbsp;I said yes and she replied. &quot;Good&#44; I said that  you did but your brother and sister said you wouldn&#8217;t.&quot; &nbsp;Didn&#8217;t bother  her at all.  Chet  &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211;  i&#8217;m an old hippie and i don&#8217;t know what to do&#8230;should i hang on to the old&#8230;or   grab on to the new   hmmmm &nbsp; &nbsp;Deb      any baby boomer old hippies out there? did you turn out as badly as your      parents feared?    &nbsp;Got in on this thread a little late. &nbsp;I watched the last 1 1/2 hours of the    Sixties and frankly I thought it was a little bit trivialized but then I    thought about it and that nice tidy happy ending is what really happened in a    lot of cases. &nbsp;Parents realized that they still loved their kids no matter    what&#44; and then everything was sort of ok again&#44; except for the vets that are    screwed up for life&#8230;..so maybe that ending was more realistic than hollywood    fantasy. &nbsp;at least that is what it was like for me &nbsp; although i gotta admit    that those brothers finding their sister at Woodstock was just a little bit    goofy    suzanne (i too am older then dirt)    OCEAN TRIBE (windsurf&#44;surf&#44;skatesail&#44;skate)    gold beach/pistol river oregon    http://www.angelfire.com/or/oceantribe/index.html  </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>any baby boomer old hippies out there? did you turn out as badly as your  parents feared?  best&#44; lny </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>  any baby boomer old hippies out there? did you turn out as badly as your   parents feared? </p>
<p>Nah&#8230;.I turned out pretty good&#8230;but Lord have mercy&#44; you should see  some of my high school classmates from the class of 1965! Condidering I  have BP&#44; MS&#44;Fibromyalgia&#44; and am in AA recovery&#8230;.whew&#44;it&#8217;s a wonder&#44;  heh??  Peace&#44;  Lynda  Reach beyond your grasp! </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>No  as a matter ofact I turned out &lt; hmmm &nbsp;better  despite them! </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>  any baby boomer old hippies out there? did you turn out as badly as your    parents feared? </p>
<p>&nbsp;Got in on this thread a little late. &nbsp;I watched the last 1 1/2 hours of the  Sixties and frankly I thought it was a little bit trivialized but then I  thought about it and that nice tidy happy ending is what really happened in a  lot of cases. &nbsp;Parents realized that they still loved their kids no matter  what&#44; and then everything was sort of ok again&#44; except for the vets that are  screwed up for life&#8230;..so maybe that ending was more realistic than hollywood  fantasy. &nbsp;at least that is what it was like for me &nbsp; although i gotta admit  that those brothers finding their sister at Woodstock was just a little bit  goofy  suzanne (i too am older then dirt)  OCEAN TRIBE (windsurf&#44;surf&#44;skatesail&#44;skate)  gold beach/pistol river oregon  http://www.angelfire.com/or/oceantribe/index.html </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>Anybody see The 60s movie the last few days? &nbsp;What did you think of it? &nbsp;I  thought it was pretty good; although it didn&#8217;t cover everything&#44; I learned a  few things and thought the events were strung together pretty well. &nbsp;Even  though the music was out of sequence. &nbsp;(The worst offender was the Graham  Nash song &#8212; which is a 1971 song!)  I&#8217;ve seen messages in other NGs which really offer no praise whatsoever to  the movie&#44; but I didn&#8217;t think it was that bad. &nbsp;I suppose most people on the  Internet can and will vehemently voice opposing opinions (sorry&#44; no  alliteration intended.)  Also&#44; did anyone see Becker last night? &nbsp;How was it? &nbsp;(It&#8217;s one of my  favorites&#44; but I watched the 60s instead.)  bw &nbsp;8-{) </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>I didn&#8217;t watch &quot;The 60&#8217;s&quot; because I didn&#8217;t want to see a very important  influential part of my life trivialized. &nbsp;I hope that maybe the show was more  than I gave it credit for. &nbsp;The late 60&#8217;s and early 70&#8217;s shaped my social&#44;  cultural&#44; and political points of view.  I need to be careful&#44; I&#8217;m sounding really old here&#8211;sigh.  Kate </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p> I didn&#8217;t watch &quot;The 60&#8217;s&quot; because I didn&#8217;t want to see a very important  influential part of my life trivialized. &nbsp;I hope that maybe the show was  more  than I gave it credit for. &nbsp;The late 60&#8217;s and early 70&#8217;s shaped my social&#44;  cultural&#44; and political points of view.  I need to be careful&#44; I&#8217;m sounding really old here&#8211;sigh.  Kate </p>
<p>Even though I work for an NBC affiliate&#44; I&#8217;ve got to admit that you didn&#8217;t  miss much other than some great music (some of which I haven&#8217;t heard in  years). The events of the sixties were skimmed over so quickly that nothing  had any real significance. A mini-series that should have run at least ten  to twelve hours but was done in four would leave anyone who DIDN&#8217;T live the  sixties feeling that it was all trivial and insignificant. I must admit&#44;  however&#44; that it brought back some incredibly vivid memories&#44; bith good adn  bad.  &nbsp; &nbsp; Larry J. </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>I didn&#8217;t see the show (don&#8217;t see many shows)&#44; but given that I was born in  &#8216;61&#44; my recollections of the 60&#8217;s are more of the &#8216;Wonder Years&#8217; variety.  I do think however that it&#8217;s important to open our eyes to where we&#8217;ve been  &#8211;especially through the perspective of others&#8211; so that we are always  questioning our beliefs. &nbsp;Who we are is made up of our beliefs based on our  experience and analysis of same &#8212; ALL of our beliefs can&#8217;t be &#8216;right&#8217; . .  . we could be doing better for ourselves if we recognize that and change  the ones that don&#8217;t work.  Just my 2cents.  &#8212;  Kath  From here on my branch I can choose to plunge or soar.  I think I shall sit a while longer.  &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text -&lt;snip   A mini-series that should have run at least ten   to twelve hours but was done in four would leave anyone who DIDN&#8217;T live  the   sixties feeling that it was all trivial and insignificant. I must admit&#44;   however&#44; that it brought back some incredibly vivid memories&#44; bith good  adn   bad.   &nbsp; &nbsp; Larry J.  </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p> I didn&#8217;t watch &quot;The 60&#8217;s&quot; because I didn&#8217;t want to see a very important  influential part of my life trivialized. &nbsp;I hope that maybe the show was more  than I gave it credit for. &nbsp;The late 60&#8217;s and early 70&#8217;s shaped my social&#44;  cultural&#44; and political points of view.  I need to be careful&#44; I&#8217;m sounding really old here&#8211;sigh. </p>
<p>Personally I found the 1860s to be more interesting and stimulating  (particularly living in the South). But there were less drugs available.  Kate </p>
<p>I did tape the miniseries and plan on viewing it &#8212; if I should ever feel  nostalgic.  James </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>You and I both Lynda&#8230;.and the 60&#8217;s were difficult and yet liberating.  &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211;    &#8230; I was born in     &#8216;61 &#8230;    So was I!     Kath    &#8230;    bw &nbsp;8-{)   You all are mere babies!   Oh hell&#8230;I was born in 19476&#8230;I am over a half century old!   Aaarrrrgggghhhhh!!!   Peace&#44;   Lynda&#44; the Elder   &#8212;   Reach beyond your grasp!  </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>In my circle of light I am called The Crone&#44; &nbsp;One who is older and who  has walked the many miles. &nbsp;But perhaps it is not the age of the body  but what we are willing to have learned that matters in our lives now  &lt;S Angel  &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211;    &#8230; I was born in     &#8216;61 &#8230;    So was I!     Kath    &#8230;    bw &nbsp;8-{)   You all are mere babies!   Oh hell&#8230;I was born in 19476&#8230;I am over a half century old!   Aaarrrrgggghhhhh!!!   Peace&#44;   Lynda&#44; the Elder   &#8212;   Reach beyond your grasp!  </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>  &#8230; I was born in   &#8216;61 &#8230; </p>
<p>So was I!   &#8212;   Kath </p>
<p>&#8230;  bw &nbsp;8-{) </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>   &#8230; I was born in    &#8216;61 &#8230;   So was I!    Kath   &#8230;   bw &nbsp;8-{) </p>
<p>You all are mere babies!  Oh hell&#8230;I was born in 19476&#8230;I am over a half century old!  Aaarrrrgggghhhhh!!!  Peace&#44;  Lynda&#44; the Elder  &#8212;  Reach beyond your grasp! </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>I like this! Don&#8217;t ever let go of your beliefs. Most people sell out  for security&#44; and look what a mess the world is.  Keith  &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211; From where I sitting&#44; I owe my &quot;inner radical&quot; an apology for neglecting her  and becoming so apathetic over the years. &nbsp;I have re-discovered my  activism/feminist/civil rights/anti-war beliefs and know that inside I am  committed as I have ever been.  If I get old in spite of my self&#44; I plan on being the world&#8217;s oldest activist  to be arrested for chaining herself to the doors of members of congress.  Kate   I didn&#8217;t see the show (don&#8217;t see many shows)&#44; but given that I was born in   &#8216;61&#44; my recollections of the 60&#8217;s are more of the &#8216;Wonder Years&#8217; variety. &nbsp;I   do think however that it&#8217;s important to open our eyes to where we&#8217;ve been   &#8211;especially through the perspective of others&#8211; so that we are always   questioning our beliefs. &nbsp;Who we are is made up of our beliefs based on our   experience and analysis of same &#8212; ALL of our beliefs can&#8217;t be &#8216;right&#8217; . . .   we could be doing better for ourselves if we recognize that and change the   ones that don&#8217;t work.   Just my 2cents.   &#8212;   Kath </p>
<p> &nbsp;http://www.newsfeeds.com/ &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; The Largest Usenet Servers in the World! </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>From where I sitting&#44; I owe my &quot;inner radical&quot; an apology for neglecting her  and becoming so apathetic over the years. &nbsp;I have re-discovered my  activism/feminist/civil rights/anti-war beliefs and know that inside I am  committed as I have ever been.  If I get old in spite of my self&#44; I plan on being the world&#8217;s oldest activist  to be arrested for chaining herself to the doors of members of congress.  Kate  &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211;  I didn&#8217;t see the show (don&#8217;t see many shows)&#44; but given that I was born in   &#8216;61&#44; my recollections of the 60&#8217;s are more of the &#8216;Wonder Years&#8217; variety. &nbsp;I   do think however that it&#8217;s important to open our eyes to where we&#8217;ve been   &#8211;especially through the perspective of others&#8211; so that we are always   questioning our beliefs. &nbsp;Who we are is made up of our beliefs based on our   experience and analysis of same &#8212; ALL of our beliefs can&#8217;t be &#8216;right&#8217; . . .   we could be doing better for ourselves if we recognize that and change the   ones that don&#8217;t work.   Just my 2cents.   &#8212;   Kath  </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://activismchange.com/feminist-activism/the-60s-342942.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lyrics, please.</title>
		<link>http://activismchange.com/feminist-activism/lyrics.html</link>
		<comments>http://activismchange.com/feminist-activism/lyrics.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 1993 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Feminist Activism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://activismchange.com/uncategorized/lyrics.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Question:
  I am looking for the lyrics of a song from a girl band&#44; I think   its name is CONSOLIDATED. They sound like APPOLLONIA 6 did&#44; and   they seem to be much more explicit.   The title of the song is NOW YOU SUCK&#44; or something like this.  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h4><strong>Question:</strong></h4>
<p>  I am looking for the lyrics of a song from a girl band&#44; I think   its name is CONSOLIDATED. They sound like APPOLLONIA 6 did&#44; and   they seem to be much more explicit.   The title of the song is NOW YOU SUCK&#44; or something like this.   I would not be surprised to learn that they are *close* to   the feminist activism.   Please post these lyrics for everybody here&#44; it will be a   very good *alternative* to the usual messages. </p>
<p>The song in question is a collaboration between CONSOLIDATED (All male)  and the YEASTIE GIRLS (sic) (All girl).  C-Ya  J0N </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>  I am looking for the lyrics of a song from a girl band&#44; I think   its name is CONSOLIDATED. They sound like APPOLLONIA 6 did&#44; and   they seem to be much more explicit.   The title of the song is NOW YOU SUCK&#44; or something like this.   I would not be surprised to learn that they are *close* to   the feminist activism.   Please post these lyrics for everybody here&#44; it will be a   very good *alternative* to the usual messages. </p>
<p>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; The song is indeed YOU SUCK from CONSOLIDATED&#44; but CONSOLIDATED is a &nbsp;  bunch of political/vegetarian guys from San Francisco who do this &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;  quasi-techno-rap thing. &nbsp;They&#8217;re OK. My roommate really liked them. &nbsp;The track  is from their new album called PLAY MORE MUSIC on Nettwerk&#44; I think&#44; and the  girls are the YEASTIE GIRLS. &nbsp;It says so in the liner notes. &nbsp;I&#8217;m not making it  up.  &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &quot;She&#8217;s my fave&#8230;undressing in the sun&#8230;return to sea&#8230;bye&#8230;  &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; forgetting everyone&#8230;eleven high&#8230;ride away&#8230;&quot;  &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Dave La Soul </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p> &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211;   I am looking for the lyrics of a song from a girl band&#44; I think    its name is CONSOLIDATED. They sound like APPOLLONIA 6 did&#44; and    they seem to be much more explicit.    The title of the song is NOW YOU SUCK&#44; or something like this.    I would not be surprised to learn that they are *close* to    the feminist activism.    Please post these lyrics for everybody here&#44; it will be a    very good *alternative* to the usual messages.   &nbsp; &nbsp;The song is indeed YOU SUCK from CONSOLIDATED&#44; but CONSOLIDATED is a &nbsp;   bunch of political/vegetarian guys from San Francisco who do this &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;   quasi-techno-rap thing. &nbsp;They&#8217;re OK. My roommate really liked them. &nbsp;The track   is from their new album called PLAY MORE MUSIC on Nettwerk&#44; I think&#44; and the   girls are the YEASTIE GIRLS. &nbsp;It says so in the liner notes. &nbsp;I&#8217;m not making it   up. </p>
<p>YOU SUCK(Music by Concolidated lyrics by the Yeastie Girls)  I know your really proud cause you think you&#8217;re well hung  But I think it&#8217;s time you learn how to use your tounge  You say you want things to be even and you want things to be fair  But your afraid to get your teeth caught in my pubic hair  If you&#8217;re lying there expecting me to suck your dick  You&#8217;re going to have to give me more than just a token lick  Well you may not like it but you better learn how  Cause its your turn now  Now you suck  suck it hard  go down baby  you suck  lick it hard  and move your tounge around  If you&#8217;re worried about babies you can lower your risk  By giving me that special cunnilingus kiss  It&#8217;s on your face that I&#8217;m going to sit  You can wiggle you can jiggle your tounge on my clit  Don&#8217;t worry about making me have an orgasm  Just take your time and do it with enthusiasm  I can tell it&#8217;s making you scared just thinking of it  But you better learn to love it  CHORUS  When you hear safe sex you snicker under your breath  WE got to take cover we&#8217;re flirting with death  AIDS is our problem we&#8217;ve got to talk  So break out your dental dam and your latex sock  I&#8217;m your latex lover wraped like a gift  Got my microwave plastic wrap heating up my clit  Dinner&#8217;s on get busy with my booty  Got a couple of flavors seet licorice and fruity  I know you&#8217;re sad luscious pussy with a cover  I&#8217;m aching too we can&#8217;t taste eachother  There&#8217;s no slacking off with an unprotected stroke  This ain&#8217;t no Joke  CHORUS  Well I know you think it&#8217;s a real drag  To suck my cunt when I&#8217;m on the rag  Quit making up stories yeah give me a break  Cause I really don&#8217;t believe that you got a headache  You tell me it&#8217;s gross to suck my yeast infection  How do think I feel when I gag on your erection  Your wasting your tounge with lame excuses and lies  Get your face between my thighs  CHORUS </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p> I am looking for the lyrics of a song from a girl band&#44; I think  its name is CONSOLIDATED. They sound like APPOLLONIA 6 did&#44; and  they seem to be much more explicit.  The title of the song is NOW YOU SUCK&#44; or something like this.  I would not be surprised to learn that they are *close* to  the feminist activism.  Please post these lyrics for everybody here&#44; it will be a  very good *alternative* to the usual messages. </p>
<p>the band named was Consoliaddated &#44; from their &quot;Play More Music&quot; lp&#8230;..  the liner noted to &quot;You Suck:&quot;&quot; calls the galls&#44; &quot;Ther Yeastie Yeastie Girls&quot; &#8230;.  and to my knowledge&#44; they have never released anything on their own&#8230;.  &nbsp; lin </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>I am looking for the lyrics of a song from a girl band&#44; I think  its name is CONSOLIDATED. They sound like APPOLLONIA 6 did&#44; and  they seem to be much more explicit.  The title of the song is NOW YOU SUCK&#44; or something like this.  I would not be surprised to learn that they are *close* to  the feminist activism.  Please post these lyrics for everybody here&#44; it will be a  very good *alternative* to the usual messages. </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>Excerpts from netnews.alt.music.alternative: 23-Feb-93 Lyrics&#44; please.   I am looking for the lyrics of a song from a girl band&#44; I think   its name is CONSOLIDATED. They sound like APPOLLONIA 6 did&#44; and   they seem to be much more explicit.   The title of the song is NOW YOU SUCK&#44; or something like this.   I would not be surprised to learn that they are *close* to   the feminist activism.   Please post these lyrics for everybody here&#44; it will be a   very good *alternative* to the usual messages. </p>
<p>Well&#44; gosh&#44; the three men who are Consolidated would probably be quite  flattered to be called women&#44; since they are constantly whining about  being white american males.  Anyway&#44; the song you are referring to is entitled &quot;You Suck&quot;&#44; guest  stars the Yeastie Girls and is on their latest full lengther&#44; _Play More  Music_.  Consolidated is not&#44; as I mentioned&#44; a girl band at all&#44; but is three  guys: &nbsp;Mark Pistel (who has done work with the Disposable Heroes of  Hiphoprisy)&#44; Adam Sherburne (formerly of the awful Until December) and  Philip Steir. &nbsp;Consolidated plays highly political rap music and do it  reasonably well&#44; but they&#8217;ve got some big problems which detract. &nbsp;First  of all&#44; they&#8217;re incredibly self-righteous and pedantic. &nbsp;Unless you like  being beaten over the head with issues&#44; you&#8217;re not going to enjoy  listening to Consolidated&#8217;s lyrics. &nbsp;Second of all&#44; the music often  seems secondary to the lyrics&#44; which aren&#8217;t that strong in the first  place. &nbsp;Third&#44; they use the audience sample schtick too much (they&#8217;ll  have little thirty second bits of audience sample between virtually  every track and it really breaks up whatever momentum they build up).  Although their good tracks are often quite good&#44; the bad tracks and the  attitude of &quot;we&#8217;re right&#44; you&#8217;re wrong&#44; fuck you&#44; you WILL listen to us&quot;  just drags them down. &nbsp;Listen to&#44; say&#44; Public Enemy or the Disposable  Heroes instead (or the Goats&#44; whose new album _Tricks of the Shade_ is  great).  As for the lyrics&#44; well&#44; I&#8217;d prefer not to post them. &nbsp;They aren&#8217;t that  great&#44; and I don&#8217;t feel like typing them up. &nbsp;Sorry.  &quot;Anybody who thinks we overstepped the playground perimeter of lyrical  decency (or that the public has any right to demand &#8217;social  responsibility&#8217; from a goddamn punk rock band) is a pure natural dolt&#44;  and should step forward and put his tongue up my ass.&quot; &#8211; Steve Albini </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://activismchange.com/feminist-activism/lyrics.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
