Sue Smith: NOW Woman of the Year (repost).

Question:

On 14 Feb 1997 07:58:08 GMT, "Darklady" <darkl…@spiritone.com> wrote: – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->MRX <I-am-at-…@Lonet.ca> wrote in article ><5e07el$…@nr1.toronto.istar.net>… >> On 12 Feb 1997 19:05:42 GMT, "Darklady" <darkl…@spiritone.com> >> wrote: >> >Lenny Schafer <scha…@netcom.com> wrote in article >> ><schaferE5GIL7….@netcom.com>… >> >> FEMINISTS SPLIT OVER SUE SMITH >> >> Copyright 1996 >> > So this is how you defend your attacks on feminism? By posting >> >backwash like this? (sheeeesh!) >> at least it was humorous, timely, and relevant, not to mention clever >> and original….so very unlike anything you have written to date. > Imagine my near suicidal depression knowing you haven’t enjoyed my >posts.

nope…sorry…nowhere near suicidal at anything you wrote. although i may actually hurt myself when i cackle with glee at the stuff you have written, which is not intended to be humorous, but is hilarius as hell. > You’re getting your money’s worth, sunshine. If you want something >more "orignal and clever" then maybe you should pay for it.

why do you women always want men to pay for something of yours? > I will >continue to learn from your insightful and well-constructed posts in the >hopes that I can be half as "humorous, timely, and relevant" as you and >your mentors are.

you will likely never achieve that. you have not shown any potential whatsoever. > — Humbly, Darklady

*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* Humbly yours, MRX *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*

Response:

On 12 Feb 1997 19:05:42 GMT, "Darklady" <darkl…@spiritone.com> wrote: >Lenny Schafer <scha…@netcom.com> wrote in article ><schaferE5GIL7….@netcom.com>… >> FEMINISTS SPLIT OVER SUE SMITH >> Copyright 1996 > So this is how you defend your attacks on feminism? By posting >backwash like this? (sheeeesh!) > — Darklady

at least it was humorous, timely, and relevant, not to mention clever and original….so very unlike anything you have written to date. ————————————————————————— —- While you may feel the need to respond to me personally, through e-mail, kindly refrain from doing so. Unless e-mail is expressly requested in my posting, then your e-mail is NOT requested. This is the medium…please keep it here. Your harrassment of me through e-mail is unsolicited. Govern yourself accordingly. Have a nice day ————————————————————————— —-

Response:

MRX <I-am-at-…@Lonet.ca> wrote in article <5e07el$…@nr1.toronto.istar.net>… > On 12 Feb 1997 19:05:42 GMT, "Darklady" <darkl…@spiritone.com> > wrote: > >Lenny Schafer <scha…@netcom.com> wrote in article > ><schaferE5GIL7….@netcom.com>… > >> FEMINISTS SPLIT OVER SUE SMITH > >> Copyright 1996 > > So this is how you defend your attacks on feminism? By posting > >backwash like this? (sheeeesh!)

– http://www.spiritone.com/~darklady (optimized for IE 3.0) http://www.bcmark.com/exotic.html (my new book!) http://www.xmag.com (the magazine I edit) > at least it was humorous, timely, and relevant, not to mention clever > and original….so very unlike anything you have written to date.

Imagine my near suicidal depression knowing you haven’t enjoyed my posts. You’re getting your money’s worth, sunshine. If you want something more "orignal and clever" then maybe you should pay for it. I will continue to learn from your insightful and well-constructed posts in the hopes that I can be half as "humorous, timely, and relevant" as you and your mentors are. — Humbly, Darklady — http://www.spiritone.com/~darklady (optimized for IE 3.0) http://www.bcmark.com/exotic.html (my new book!) http://www.xmag.com (the magazine I edit)

Response:

It’s nice to see that Lenny Schafer is so comfortable forging quotations from actual NOW members. I doubt that he’d be equally comfortable answering a charge of libel. — Chris Lyman, SP4, and clearly Soft on Liberalism "The first time I used a phonoscope, I examined a B-flat of medium size. I can assure you that I have never seen anything so revolting." — Eric Satie

Response:

(Huge obvious troll cut to the punchline) > Sue Smith replaces Lorena Bobbit as the N.O.W. Woman of the > Year. Bobbit was named the organization hero — she was found guilty of > being temporarily insane for severing the penis of her sleeping husband. > Despite being touted as a role-model for women, Bobbit renounced any > affiliation with any women’s group. "I’m just a manicurist–I just want > to be left alone so I can get back to my job and get my tips." > Elsewhere in Boston, Sen. Ted Kennedy denied knowing Sue > Smith or every having given her driving lessons.

So this is how you defend your attacks on feminism? By posting backwash like this? (sheeeesh!) – Darklady — http://www.spiritone.com/~darklady (optimized for IE 3.0) http://www.bcmark.com/exotic.html (my new book!) http://www.xmag.com (the magazine I edit)

Response:

Filed under: Feminism

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

TrackBack URL | RSS feed for comments on this post.

Activism Change

Learn, read, react :: Activism