Activism Change

Jayne, you contradict yourself a lot

Question:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Jayne, you said one of the things that attracting you to Catholocism was the paradoxes inherent in the teachings.  I’ve noticed that you’ve fully embraced those paradoxes in your own posts.  For example, you’ve claimed that oral sex is acceptable between a married couple, but at the same time, you’ve claimed that mutual masturbation without intercourse, and without the intent of procreation is a sin.  So how do you resolve this paradox, Jayne?  Do you really think your GODcares whether or not you give your husband a blow job? Perhaps ‘her’  "God" is in a jar on the shelf, next to ‘her’ battery operated rubberized lips.  Talk about SIN!  I feel sorry for the lips.  :-) What does the church say about ‘rubberbation’ or ‘masturplasticon’?

They say it’s a sin.  :)

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Jayne, you said one of the things that attracting you to Catholocism was the paradoxes inherent in the teachings.  I’ve noticed that you’ve fully embraced those paradoxes in your own posts.  For example, you’ve claimed that oral sex is acceptable between a married couple, but at the same time, you’ve claimed that mutual masturbation without intercourse, and without the intent of procreation is a sin.  So how do you resolve this paradox, Jayne?  Do you really think your GOD cares whether or not you give your husband a blow job? Gee Maxie, I would have though that a girl of your "intelligence" could have thought that one through…I’ll leave it as an exercise for the student…

There is only one solution to the problem.  Her husband comes in her mouth and she spits it in her twat.  Either way, she’s a hypocrite.

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Jayne, you said one of the things that attracting you to Catholocism was the paradoxes inherent in the teachings.  I’ve noticed that you’ve fully embraced those paradoxes in your own posts.  For example, you’ve claimed that oral sex is acceptable between a married couple, but at the same time, you’ve claimed that mutual masturbation without intercourse, and without the intent of procreation is a sin.  So how do you resolve this paradox, Jayne?  Do you really think your GOD cares whether or not you give your husband a blow job? Gee Maxie, I would have though that a girl of your "intelligence" could have thought that one through…I’ll leave it as an exercise for the student… There is only one solution to the problem.  Her husband comes in her mouth and she spits it in her twat.  Either way, she’s a hypocrite.

As long as she doesn’t spit it on my leg, it’s a deal.  If I wanted it on my leg, I’d have put it there in the first place. — V.G. "People are more violently opposed to fur than leather, because it is easier to harrass rich women than it is motorcycle gangs." – Bumper Sticker (This sig file contains not less than 80% recycled SPAM) Sarcasm is my sword, Apathy is my shield.

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – [Maxie's concern about someone's sex life snipped] Maxie, here’s a clue from an adult to you: When someone launches a thread with the name of a news group participant in the Subject line, the adults immediately spot what that ’someone’ is up to.  Uh huh, you are trying to make personalities the issue instead of letting the issues be the issues under discussion. Maxie, given your need to project your sexual inadequacies onto others as well as your guilty conscience over your apostasy, I suggest you take your personal issues outside the news groups and to a psychologist with a background in faith based ministry to emotionally troubled people like yourself. Good luck getting both your mitts around that pole in your eye so you can yank hard to get it out.  :-)

You poor, poor idiot. May a thousand socks overrun your group. SOON. <evil larf – theoneflasehaddock

Response:

Jayne, you said one of the things that attracting you to Catholocism was the paradoxes inherent in the teachings.  I’ve noticed that you’ve fully embraced those paradoxes in your own posts.  For example, you’ve claimed that oral sex is acceptable between a married couple, but at the same time, you’ve claimed that mutual masturbation without intercourse, and without the intent of procreation is a sin.  So how do you resolve this paradox, Jayne?  Do you really think your GOD cares whether or not you give your husband a blow job?

        Gee Maxie, I would have though that a girl of your "intelligence" could have thought that one through…I’ll leave it as an exercise for the student… …Ken

Response:

Jayne, you said one of the things that attracting you to Catholocism was the paradoxes inherent in the teachings.  I’ve noticed that you’ve fully embraced those paradoxes in your own posts.  For example, you’ve claimed that oral sex is acceptable between a married couple, but at the same time, you’ve claimed that mutual masturbation without intercourse, and without the intent of procreation is a sin.  So how do you resolve this paradox, Jayne?  Do you really think your GOD cares whether or not you give your husband a blow job?

Response:

[Maxie's concern about someone's sex life snipped]

Maxie, here’s a clue from an adult to you: When someone launches a thread with the name of a news group participant in the Subject line, the adults immediately spot what that ’someone’ is up to.  Uh huh, you are trying to make personalities the issue instead of letting the issues be the issues under discussion. Maxie, given your need to project your sexual inadequacies onto others as well as your guilty conscience over your apostasy, I suggest you take your personal issues outside the news groups and to a psychologist with a background in faith based ministry to emotionally troubled people like yourself. Good luck getting both your mitts around that pole in your eye so you can yank hard to get it out.  :-) —    Thousands of years ago, women figured out    they could disguise their preferences as ‘religion’    and control gullible men that way. In one part of    the world, I imagine the conversation went like this:    Husband: I’ll be back in an hour. I’m going to    covet my neighbor’s wife.    Wife: You can’t do that.    Husband: Why not?    Wife (thinking fast): Um… God said so.    He’s an omnipotent being. If you don’t obey    him you’ll burn in hell.    Husband: Whoa, that was a close one.    Thanks for warning me. How about if    I kill her husband first?    Wife: Ooh, bad news on that, too.    _The Dilbert Future_ by Scott Adams,    chapter seven, The Future Of Gender    Relations, page 110, hb.

Response:

Filed under: Feminism

Related Posts

• VERY SEXY STUFF 20865
• Social Welfare Policy
• A bucket of KFC is 100% healthy
• Man forces woman to walk naked before co-workers
• surrealism and Daniel Urtiz
• OT What a year! (sorry, long)
• OT:Sort of from Georga
• Rage, Rage, Against The Evil Male Blight.
• I've been drinking beer lately.
• Afghan women expelled from school for being married