Activism Change

Feminnazis

Question:

>Wendy A. S. Taylor (ccx…@coventry.ac.uk) wrote: >>Jackie >>"Single parent…..who not only is happy about it, but proud of it…." >>Just a thought, and no you don’t sound like a feminnazi to me. >>Wendy >What?  a single woman who is "proud" and "happy" to have >deprived her kid of a Father?

Why do you think all single parent woman are depriving their children?  Most single parents are forced into that position.  Chances are they are in a much healthier position.  It is not what they would choose over having a happy, healthy family that includes *Dad*.  They take a bad situation and make it as good as possible. They should be proud of working hard and being both mom and dad for the children.   What would you think they should do when dumped by the spouse? Die???  Furthermore, not all men want their children and ignore them while living in the same house.  What difference does it make if he is now living somewhere else?  Not all women get child support even though they are entitled to it. >No, I can’t

say that I know too many feminists that would even go>as far as that.  So no, I wouldn’t even call her "feminist."  Maybe>non-human would be more appropriate.  Maybe.>And, Wendi:  the fact that your "advise" was so diluted, so>non-critical, is almost like you WANT to perpetuate social tolerance>towards people like her.>Her daughter will grow up believing "it’s nothing wrong", get pregnant>and become another one of these cases.  That’s what you ‘gals want?>See, if you don’t criticize evil, you are part of the problem yourself.> That is such BS.  You are exactly what you criticize these women of being….non-human.  You pigeon hole women and then wonder why they are doing it back to save face and strength.  Where is your respect, man????  Give it to receive it…. >This is exactly why we no longer have strong

families and you are>talking on the single.parents group rather than having a nice family.>If you claim to be "happy" to raise fatherless kids, you are giving>other women /feminists a bad reputation.> That is not correct.  Single parent women are not breaking down families alone.  Many men are playing a big part in it too with attitudes such as yours.  -Kill the child if *I* don’t want it…if you don’t, no support. Hey, the man is in the prone position too.  What’s the mans part in it all besides dictating whether a child should live or die because of it’s *father’s sins*? You are what you accuse every women of being, then play a blame-shifting game.  All men are not created equal, Thank God, and neither are women.

Response:

Wendy A. S. Taylor (ccx…@coventry.ac.uk) wrote: >Jackie >"Single parent…..who not only is happy about it, but proud of it…." >Just a thought, and no you don’t sound like a feminnazi to me. >Wendy

What?  a single woman who is "proud" and "happy" to have deprived her kid of a Father? No, I can’t say that I know too many feminists that would even go as far as that.  So no, I wouldn’t even call her "feminist."  Maybe non-human would be more appropriate.  Maybe. And, Wendi:  the fact that your "advise" was so diluted, so non-critical, is almost like you WANT to perpetuate social tolerance towards people like her. Her daughter will grow up believing "it’s nothing wrong", get pregnant and become another one of these cases.  That’s what you ‘gals want? See, if you don’t criticize evil, you are part of the problem yourself. This is exactly why we no longer have strong families and you are talking on the single.parents group rather than having a nice family. If you claim to be "happy" to raise fatherless kids, you are giving other women /feminists a bad reputation. And ask yourself, what motivation will a man have to get involved with all that?  It’s sad.  But I’m not gonna sit here trying to change every feminist 1/2 brain.  Like I once said to my friend;  hey, if she needs you to be her Man, let her first earn your interest. — Dick S.

Response:

JamBTDT jamb…@aol.com wrote: >I cannot believe that there are actually people out there who consider = my >lifestyle that of a "feminnazi". =20

Aren’t you happy that AOL gives unlimited free 30 days trial accounts. That way, you can post your lame excuses under multiple names such as: Jean Coyle jeanco…@earthlink.net, grsg…@aol.com etc., etc. But, your story and the style is all the same.  Everyone knows it’s you, so don’t even bother to create all those new accounts… >Single parenthood was a choice for me…it was either that or get the = abortion >that my daughter’s father wanted me to have.  He would not consider = anything >else.  So in a sense….it was a choice….given those two alternatives,=  it was >the right choice—the only choice for me.

The myth that choice for men is about men trying to evade parental responsibilities is FALSE and SEXIST.  In the US, choice for men would give men only the rights women have had since Roe v Wade, nothing more. It would not let the man compel the woman to abort.  See http://www.nas.com/c4m A  QUESTION  YOU’VE  NEVER  ANSWERED: ———————————————————————-  *  As a "good feminist"  - IF – all you wanted was "equality", why did you take away man’s RIGHT to decide on the parenthood planning? Weren’t you the first one to have thrown the "first punch" by attempting to CONTROL the man with an unwanted baby?  I would say so. You have maternal instincts that dictate giving birth to kids. Fine. But, you could of went to a sperm bank and inseminate yourself, hon. So!  WHY did you date and sleep with that man – if you wasn’t prepared to let him exercise his (equal) RIGHT to have a say whether or not he wants to keep the pregnancy?  If you, zoolus, can’t answer that basic question, you are morally bankrupt in my books.  This is America, where the abortion was (and still is) LEGAL. I can’t help it, but to observe how from one corner of your mouth feminists claim "nothing but equality", and from the other corner you’re taking away the man’s right in the same breath! It is because of people like you that feminism is considered morally bankrupt.  You’ve lost our respect – exactly because of your double standards and lies. >I find the implication that people in my position are lesbians who get = involved >in a relationship with the sole purpose of having a child ludicrous.  I = am not >a lesbian, but I find that line of thinking archaic.

Your "position"? …that’s what you call being a feminist? TRICK:  "Well I don’t approve of feminist lesbians.  Only some=20 are radical feminists do that. Maybe."  (yeah, sure.) If you genuinely don’t, then we weren’t criticizing _you_. But generally the statement is part of the old good cop / bad cop routine.  Do you ever actually criticize the misandrists? Ever advance new arguments against feminist policies or actions? Ever spread the word about the latest feminist outrage? Or do you just tell us to stop holding feminism accountable? >I realize that I will never be able to talk to some of the obstinate = people on >this subject.  But remember.."until you walk a day in my shoes……." =20

No.  We are not "obstinate people".  Those of us who want to maintain family values that worked for thousands of years are not "obstinate". It’s "women" like you who want to act "wise" and to re-invent the wheel every day, in their contest against man and the idea of family. — Dick S. "Feminism is to female as racism is to race."

Response:

Filed under: Feminism

Related Posts

• Singh: NO SORENSTAM ON PGA TOUR
• Should feminists have the right to make false police reports?
• MISS AMERICA DECEPTION, my husband says she is lovely
• Turn the other cheek
• Reflections of an Arab Jew
• Imagine
• It's funny isn't it
• hi I'm new here
• Langers Employer (CEI) caught lying to Congress
• Childern and Divorce