Fifth Column of Filthy, Traitorous Vegan Rats Arrested in S.F.
Question:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Send them all to Iraq as human shields to protect our troops! There is a right to free speech and peaceful assembly. You don’t have to like it but the right is there for all. As soon as the right is removed for one it is easy to remove for other ‘undesirables’. Were they ALL vegan? Andy At what point does throwing newspaper vending boxes into the street to block traffic and blocking traffic to the bridge count as "peaceful assembly?"
That’s not even half of it. The "free speech" and "peaceful assembly" that the moronic idiot named "Andy" supports, includes assault, arson, looting, and property damage.
Response:
Send them all to Iraq as human shields to protect our troops! Protect the troops. Bring them home. Gwier, nobody (except for ignorant Marxists like Hope) is buying your phoney peace activism. You’re a neo-nazi, holocaust- revisionist. The farthest thing from your small mind is "peace". Go sell your wares to some skinheads.
And as there are sixteen confirmed American deaths and as I say no Iraqi is worth one American death I say bring them home. All of Iraq is not worth one American life. You, however, do not care how many Americans die. — 2003 March 10: Israel murders four Palestinians. — The Iron Webmaster, 2563
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Send them all to Iraq as human shields to protect our troops! Protect the troops. Bring them home. Protect them from stampeding hordes of surrendering Iraqi soldiers? Protect them from the Iraqi Welcome Wagon? Protect them from the threat that Saddam poses to the US. Oh, wait a minute… rotfl. Usually-reliable sources say they found him on one side of the room and his balls on the other.
Good propaganda must excite prurient interests. — Iraq: The first war fought over a plagerized, twelve year old graduate thesis. — The Iron Webmaster, 2569
Response:
Send them all to Iraq as human shields to protect our troops! Protect the troops. Bring them home. Protect them from stampeding hordes of surrendering Iraqi soldiers? Protect them from the Iraqi Welcome Wagon?
Sixteen confirmed dead as of yesterday. Is any Iraqi worth one American life? As an American I say no. — Why is it all holocaust stories sound like soap operas instead of recountings of actual events? — The Iron Webmaster, 2559
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Send them all to Iraq as human shields to protect our troops! Protect the troops. Bring them home. Protect them from stampeding hordes of surrendering Iraqi soldiers? Protect them from the Iraqi Welcome Wagon? Protect them from the threat that Saddam poses to the US. Oh, wait a minute… Do you think that the SCUDS were the only things that Saddam lied about?
He has ICBMs and nuke warheads? We are doomed! — The US fought WWII because Germany declared war on the US. France just happened to be on the road to Germany. — The Iron Webmaster, 2567
Response:
Send them all to Iraq as human shields to protect our troops! Protect the troops. Bring them home. Protect them from stampeding hordes of surrendering Iraqi soldiers? Protect them from the Iraqi Welcome Wagon?
They’re safer in Iraq than they would be in San Francisco, with the violent thugs and career criminals pretending to be "peace" protesters mobbing and attacking…… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text –
Response:
Send them all to Iraq as human shields to protect our troops! Protect the troops. Bring them home. Protect them from stampeding hordes of surrendering Iraqi soldiers? Protect them from the Iraqi Welcome Wagon?
Protect them from falling Saddam posters! Alan — http://www.mythusmage.com Writing Practice at: http://www.gamingoutpost.com
Response:
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Send them all to Iraq as human shields to protect our troops! Protect the troops. Bring them home. Protect them from stampeding hordes of surrendering Iraqi soldiers? Hehehe… Protect them from the Iraqi Welcome Wagon? Quite. The Iraqi’s support our troops more than the small, vocal minority of ignorant "peace activists"
There have been reports of Iraqi units volunteering to aid U.S. forces in an active combat role. Alan — http://www.mythusmage.com Writing Practice at: http://www.gamingoutpost.com
Response:
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Send them all to Iraq as human shields to protect our troops! Protect the troops. Bring them home. Protect them from stampeding hordes of surrendering Iraqi soldiers? Protect them from the Iraqi Welcome Wagon? Protect them from the threat that Saddam poses to the US. Oh, wait a minute… Do you think that the SCUDS were the only things that Saddam lied about?
Nope. I think he lies as a matter of routine, much like our own illustrious leader. But I don’t think he poses any kind of real threat to us. According to the Washington Post, ( http://makeashorterlink.com/?V2BC155E3 ), analysts estimate that he has 20 SCUDs, other some nations have given estimates ranging from 12 to 25. These missles can only reach his closest neighbors, and they cannot reach any European country. He’s also supposed to have 50 al-Samoud missles, a successor to the SCUD, having scrapped about 70 since the inspectors went back in last fall. These missles also have a range limit which precludes them from hitting anything outside of the middle east. You can paint quite the visual imagery with the label of "mass destruction" for these weapons, but they do not seem a real concern. There’s still no sign of any chemical or biological weapons, but if we do eventually find some, again simply judging their threat level from the label "chemical" applied to them is quite foolish. The real question is, what is the potential for these weapons to do damage? It’s not the fact that these weapons are chemical weapons, but it’s the specifics of how they can be used, how easy they are to transport, and their effective range that’s should determine whether or not they are a weapon of mass destruction. To those who think that any chemical weapon is automatically a WOMD let me point out that lead is a chemical, and bullets are made of lead. Simply being a chemical weapon does not make a WOMD, nor does it mean a weapon that causes your skin to melt off your body or anything more gruesome than happier weapons do, such as put holes in people or blow pieces of them up. Now that I’ve explained why I don’t see Iraq as a threat, perhaps you can explain how one might logically reconcile attacking Iraq because of the threat they pose to the world yet also believing that the threat they pose to our troops in their territory is so miniscule as to be laughable? Rich Soyack
– Hombre – Millions of families, children, men, unborn babies, and women have become casualties of feminists beloved gender war. It’s time to take their weapons away. These weapons include intolerance, censorship, financing and political intimidation.
Response:
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Send them all to Iraq as human shields to protect our troops! Protect the troops. Bring them home. Protect them from stampeding hordes of surrendering Iraqi soldiers? Protect them from the Iraqi Welcome Wagon? Protect them from the threat that Saddam poses to the US. Oh, wait a minute… Do you think that the SCUDS were the only things that Saddam lied about? Nope. I think he lies as a matter of routine, much like our own illustrious leader. But I don’t think he poses any kind of real threat to us. According to the Washington Post, ( http://makeashorterlink.com/?V2BC155E3 ), analysts estimate that he has 20 SCUDs, other some nations have given estimates ranging from 12 to 25. These missles can only reach his closest neighbors, and they cannot reach any European country. He’s also supposed to have 50 al-Samoud missles, a successor to the SCUD, having scrapped about 70 since the inspectors went back in last fall. These missles also have a range limit which precludes them from hitting anything outside of the middle east. You can paint quite the visual imagery with the label of "mass destruction" for these weapons, but they do not seem a real concern. There’s still no sign of any chemical or biological weapons, but if we do eventually find some, again simply judging their threat level from the label "chemical" applied to them is quite foolish. The real question is, what is the potential for these weapons to do damage? It’s not the fact that these weapons are chemical weapons, but it’s the specifics of how they can be used, how easy they are to transport, and their effective range that’s should determine whether or not they are a weapon of mass destruction. To those who think that any chemical weapon is automatically a WOMD let me point out that lead is a chemical, and bullets are made of lead. Simply being a chemical weapon does not make a WOMD, nor does it mean a weapon that causes your skin to melt off your body or anything more gruesome than happier weapons do, such as put holes in people or blow pieces of them up. Now that I’ve explained why I don’t see Iraq as a threat, perhaps you can explain how one might logically reconcile attacking Iraq because of the threat they pose to the world yet also believing that the threat they pose to our troops in their territory is so miniscule as to be laughable?
Perhaps after the war is over I’ll have the inclination to engage in your pointless debate. Rich Soyack
Response:
wow, are ALL harvard students vegan? if so, then there must be something good about being vegan! har har.
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Send them all to Iraq as human shields to protect our troops! — US Anti-War Protests Flare, More Than 1,000 Arrests Reuters Thursday, March 20, 2003; 8:32 PM By Adam Tanner SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) – Police arrested more than 1,000 people in San Francisco on Thursday — the most demonstrators taken into custody on a single day in the city in 22 years — as tens of thousands protested across America against the U.S. war in Iraq. "If this was happening in every city, there would either be martial law or an end to war," said one Berkeley student who chained himself to 16 others on a major San Francisco street. Protests took place in other cities across the United States as well as in European capitals. During morning rush hour in the Washington D.C., more than 100 demonstrators temporarily shut down the Key Bridge, a major route from Virginia into Washington’s Georgetown neighborhood and three were arrested. About 100 protesters later gathered in pouring rain on the streets near the White House, and about 350 demonstrators blocked evening rush hour traffic on a main Washington thoroughfare. In New York, which took the brunt of the September 11, 2001 attack that President Bush has repeatedly cited as an example of the threat to America, "September 11th Families for Peaceful Tomorrows" condemned what they called an illegal and immoral U.S. war. Anti-war demonstrators overflowed police barriers during rush hour in Times Square, completely shutting New York’s Broadway for two blocks below 42nd Street. "A year and a half ago you were heroes," one onlooker shouted as police forcibly led away one demonstrator. "Don’t become our enemies." SUPPORT FOR TROOPS Under sunny skies and temperatures in the mid-60s F, San Francisco protesters started early and continued strongly through the evening in actions aimed at choking off traffic across the city. Police in riot gear made at least 1,000 arrests, and the numbers continued to rise into the evening, a spokeswoman said, adding it was the highest total in San Francisco in 22 years. Some were kept in temporary pens erected on the street. Many towns in America displayed support for the troops, albeit in a quieter way. Towns like Waxahachie, south of Dallas, put up yellow ribbons in support of U.S. troops. Some yelled in other cities at the protesters. "They are nothing but traitors. This does nothing but give aid and support to the enemy," said Debbie Petee in San Francisco, a Bush supporter. Protesters across that nation said opposing war was not at odds with being an American patriot. "It’s not like we’re burning flags," said Danielle Geroux, a student at an anti-war rally at Florida’s capital, Tallahassee. "We just don’t want people to die." Vietnam veteran Mike Ward, 56, who participated in protest marches in the 1960s, wore his combat ribbons in San Francisco so that no one would question his patriotism. HISSES AT HARVARD Students gathered at campuses across the nation, including at Harvard University, where hundreds walked out of classes at noon and at least 1,500 people gathered at a rally. Students at California’s Berkeley campus, a hotbed of dissent against the Vietnam War in the 1960s and early 1970s, occupied the main administration building for several hours before at least 120 were arrested, Police in Pittsburgh fought with some protesters and arrested dozens. At San Francisco’s Federal Courthouse, at least two protesters took medicine that induced them to vomit. Some in the crowd flew Iraqi, Palestinian and French flags. In some areas, police charged protesters to carry them off. Sparks flew as officials sawed through chains linking protesters. Some of the city’s fabled cable cars were halted. In Madison, Wisconsin, a traditional hotbed of protest, police investigated vandalism at the state Republican party headquarters on Wednesday night in which a half-dozen windows were broken and paint bombs were tossed around. The war also clouded the upcoming Academy Awards. California’s governor on Thursday assigned a National Guard unit to protect the Oscars, but at least one prominent star withdrew from the ceremonies, saying now was not the time to celebrate. Will Smith pulled out of Sunday’s ceremony and other stars including Dustin Hoffman said they will wear peace sign pins, doves and even duct tape to protest the war in Iraq. More than 100,000 protested in Germany. In London, thousands of British anti-war campaigners blocked roads and scuffled with police. More than 10,000 people, mostly students, surged through Paris chanting anti-war slogans and some burned the U.S. flag.
Filed under: American Activism
Related Posts
- U.S. Is Not Going to War in Somalia for any Good Reasons
- Tender root-canal. Does this mean 'infection' or what?
- Slick Willie has Y2K bug! Ah-choo! Ah-ah-bfuscate!!
- ASSAULT ON LIBERTY
- PBS telephone numbers
- Going to Somalia
- Conservatives OT
- Colorado: Verdict a relief for the family
- no improvement 3 months after root canal ?
- ACTION: Call PBS to Demand Inclusion of _We Do the Work_
Leave a Comment
XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
TrackBack URL | RSS feed for comments on this post.